Unfortunately I agree with youI suspect we're never getting another look into the Kelvin-verse but I could be wrong.
Unfortunately I agree with youI suspect we're never getting another look into the Kelvin-verse but I could be wrong.
The Mirror 1701 had a more diverse crew, bearded Spock had Vulcan bodyguards. They managed to do what goody Prime 1701 refused to do, have a ship not dominated by humans. The irony!It's a game Spock plays so he can make wry observations. But if you asked him he'd deny it.
As for the crew of Kelvin Disco. I imagine it is similar to the Prime Disco. The multiverse likes to gather the same people together as seen in the Mirror Universe 1701 and the Kelvin 1701. Kelvin Lorca commands the Disco. Burnham is his science officer. Saru his XO.
Or it was blown to pieces by Nero at the Battle of VulcanThe Kelvin-Discovery is out there dealing with Whale-probes, V'Ger, the Doomsday Device and Nomad.![]()
Exactly. And Spock plays mind games like this all the time. From TOS S1 - "The Galileo Seven":It's a game Spock plays so he can make wry observations. But if you asked him he'd deny it.
KIRK: There's really something I don't understand about all of this. Maybe you can explain it to me. Logically, of course. When you jettisoned the fuel and ignited it, you knew there was virtually no chance of it being seen, yet you did it anyhow. That would seem to me to be an act of desperation.
SPOCK: Quite correct, Captain.
KIRK: Now we all know, and I'm sure the doctor will agree with me, that desperation is a highly emotional state of mind. How does your well-known logic explain that?
SPOCK: Quite simply, Captain. I examined the problem from all angles, and it was plainly hopeless. Logic informed me that under the circumstances, the only possible action would have to be one of desperation. Logical decision, logically arrived at.
KIRK: I see. You mean you reasoned that it was time for an emotional outburst.
SPOCK: Well, I wouldn't put it in exactly those terms, Captain, but those are essentially the facts.
KIRK: You're not going to admit that for the first time in your life, you committed a purely human emotional act?
SPOCK: No, sir.
KIRK: Mister Spock, you're a stubborn man.
SPOCK: Yes, sir.
There's a difference. Everyone wants to see the Enterprise and Spock. Almost no one wants to see Sybok.
I thought about that too. It's entirely possible. OR... was Discovery even built in the first place, or did the construction crew get pulled to build the U.S.S. Vengeance?Or it was blown to pieces by Nero at the Battle of Vulcan
He'd find a way to get high on the sporesI'm one of the (admittedly few) people who wouldn't mind seeing Sybok on the show.
Except, that's an enourmous retcon made after 50 years. It was in no way the intent of Spock's creators or writers for TOS, TAS, the classic movies or even the reboot movies for him to have a human sister and thus making his "attempts to understand humanity" a sham.It's a game Spock plays so he can make wry observations. But if you asked him he'd deny it.
Maybe Kelvin Sarek had the strange idea he can learn empathy from his human mother and logic from his vulcan father.And if Spock didn't have Burnham to learn empathy from, he probably learned those lessons from Uhura instead.
So?Except, that's an enourmous retcon made after 50 years. It was in no way the intent of Spock's creators or writers for TOS, TAS, the classic movies or even the reboot movies for him to have a human sister and thus making his "attempts to understand humanity" a sham.
Huh???? Was "understanding humanity" ever really a thing with Spock? Come on, he had a human mother. He might toss in a quip or two about "wacky humans and the things they do" but he wasn't on some sort of quest like Data.Except, that's an enourmous retcon made after 50 years. It was in no way the intent of Spock's creators or writers for TOS, TAS, the classic movies or even the reboot movies for him to have a human sister and thus making his "attempts to understand humanity" a sham.
When you're easily willing to change everything about key characters, it becomes a de facto reboot.
Watch "The Galileo Seven". Spock struggles to comprehend his human officer's actions and reactions. This is a guy who was raised with a human sister? Nope. Does Kelvin Spock have a sister? He didn't even understand friendship until Kirk died.Huh???? Was "understanding humanity" ever really a thing with Spock? Come on, he had a human mother. He might toss in a quip or two about "wacky humans and the things they do" but he wasn't on some sort of quest like Data.
A lot of things weren't the "intent" of the creators and writers. The line moves forward with each episode and film. Drawing the line at a particular film, episode or series comes across as being deliberately obtuse and a lack of understanding of how fictional characters develop.
Or a human mother?This is a guy who was raised with a human sister?
Of course, having TWO humans in his immediate family is twice as implausible as one.Or a human mother?
Why do people keep ignoring Amanda?
TOS Spock not understanding humans despite being raised by a human mother might wander into the realm of implausibility, but that idea was a staple of his character, so it is very much a TOS thing, implausible it or not (as are other implausible things about TOS and Trek in general that are staples of the franchise.)Of course, having TWO humans in his immediate family is twice as implausible as one.
Watch "The Galileo Seven". Spock struggles to comprehend his human officer's actions and reactions. This is a guy who was raised with a human sister? Nope. Does Kelvin Spock have a sister? He didn't even understand friendship until Kirk died.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.