Superman's a god. Batman ostensibly has no superhuman powers at all. Case closed.
Who would win in a contest is, in principle, another question.
Who would win in a contest is, in principle, another question.
What, like in Seinfeld? Well, this one I may hand to Batman.Superman's a god. Batman ostensibly has no superhuman powers at all. Case closed.
Who would win in a contest is, in principle, another question.
Writing or claiming Batman as "devious" shows a lack of understanding of the character.
Batman wouldn't give Superman any reason to suspect anything. He would be prepared before even going into a battle, perhaps planning for it months or years in advance in order to prepare for the possible scenario that he may have to fight Superman.And there is a reason why "time to prepare" is a punchline.
But Batman would sacrifice himself in order to defeat Superman if it were necessary. Superman could, but in doing so it wouldn't be done to kill Batman. Even if Batman wasn't prepared to kill Superman, by sacrificing himself to defeat Superman he would not only be defeating him but stopping Superman from saving him.Superman could do a lot to Batman and not come close to killing him. Batman's own code against killing would hamper him as well.
Superman has to fight Batman as a human and can only use the same level of physical ability that Batman can, perhaps using Kryptonite in small doses to ensure that Superman's invulnerability is negated.Depends on the contest rules and requirements.
Writing or claiming Batman as "devious" shows a lack of understanding of the character.
Batman disguises himself and goes undercover in order to find ways to exploit his enemies and gain an advantage. That's pretty devious, regardless of why he is doing it. Superman doesn't use his "Clark Kent" disguise to gain an advantage over his enemies, it's more or less a way for him to have an element of human normality in his life.
Batman wouldn't give Superman any reason to suspect anything. He would be prepared before even going into a battle, perhaps planning for it months or years in advance in order to prepare for the possible scenario that he may have to fight Superman.And there is a reason why "time to prepare" is a punchline.
It's like the X-Protocols in X-Men which Professor Xavier has devised ways to defeat all of the X-Men (including himself) should the need arise.
But Batman would sacrifice himself in order to defeat Superman if it were necessary. Superman could, but in doing so it wouldn't be done to kill Batman. Even if Batman wasn't prepared to kill Superman, by sacrificing himself to defeat Superman he would not only be defeating him but stopping Superman from saving him.Superman could do a lot to Batman and not come close to killing him. Batman's own code against killing would hamper him as well.
Superman has to fight Batman as a human and can only use the same level of physical ability that Batman can, perhaps using Kryptonite in small doses to ensure that Superman's invulnerability is negated.Depends on the contest rules and requirements.
It's the thing I hate most about Batman and his presence in the shared DC universe.Batman's biggest advantage is his genius and the ability to out-think the likes of Superman. It's a concept that I really like about the character and one that the writers have excelled with.
@ Eviscero: I thought about Dr Fate as well, but given that Superman can create sonic soundwaves which would prevent Fate from hearing Nabu, wouldn't that make Dr Fate useless?
@ Eviscero: I thought about Dr Fate as well, but given that Superman can create sonic soundwaves which would prevent Fate from hearing Nabu, wouldn't that make Dr Fate useless?
The only way for Batman to win should be if he uses kryptonite, he cannot out-think Superman, that's a ridiculous idea that annoys me every time it's used in the comics. Superman doesn't even need a plan to defeat Batman, all he has to do is use superspeed. There's no way Bruce could out-think a Superman that shows up out of nowhere and punches him in the face.Fights between, say, Batman and Superman tend to end with Batman as the victor. This is usually attributed to Batman's ability to completely out-think Superman at every turn.
The only way for Batman to win should be if he uses kryptonite, he cannot out-think Superman, that's a ridiculous idea that annoys me every time it's used in the comics. Superman doesn't even need a plan to defeat Batman, all he has to do is use superspeed. There's no way Bruce could out-think a Superman that shows up out of nowhere and punches him in the face.Fights between, say, Batman and Superman tend to end with Batman as the victor. This is usually attributed to Batman's ability to completely out-think Superman at every turn.
The same with prep-time, if Batman's prep-time doesn't include "find kryptonite rock and put it in my pocket" it shouldn't help him at all.
Those are just silly explanations because the writers want Batman to win without using kryptonite, probably because it's not batmanny enough to pull out a glowing rock and do a victory dance when Superman keels over in every fight.
Well, I was going with the "Superman doesn't kill or maim" angle. He wouldn't heat-vision off Batman's legs from a great distance because that would greatly harm Batman. But, yeah, Batman could be a great distance away and Superman could do any number of things to slow, stop or otherwise incapacitate Batman. With super-hearing and telescopic vision Superman would know Batman is coming before Batman does.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.