Re: Who can tell the difference between LP and CD, MP3 and uncompresse
That wouldn't surprise me.
If compression is not substantial (and <50% isn't, imo) then I'd prefer data files to be left uncompressed, since it makes them more easily accessible, and in a more natural format for reading and writing. People who want to tweak configuration settings or edit a data file, don't want the hassle of passing that data through an obscure compression/decompression algorithm (or even having to write their own). Accessing compressed files is like getting dressed in the dark.
Keep It Simple.
Not necessarily. Actually, with most file types (and their associated compression type) compression is usually less than 50%.I know some people are enthusiastic for flac encoding, but it doesn't make a lot of sense to me; compression is supposed to reduce file sizes by a substantial amount,
That wouldn't surprise me.

If compression is not substantial (and <50% isn't, imo) then I'd prefer data files to be left uncompressed, since it makes them more easily accessible, and in a more natural format for reading and writing. People who want to tweak configuration settings or edit a data file, don't want the hassle of passing that data through an obscure compression/decompression algorithm (or even having to write their own). Accessing compressed files is like getting dressed in the dark.
Keep It Simple.
