• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

White racist called on camera

Hey! How does that work? On Naboo, they elect their Queens... even if they're still in their teens!
 
If he wasn't white, this wouldn't be an issue.

Here, let me fix that for you:

"If he wasn't a member of the royal family, this wouldn't be an issue."

There you go. Maybe one of these days you'll say something relevant.
 
If he wasn't white, this wouldn't be an issue.

Here, let me fix that for you:

"If he wasn't a member of the royal family, this wouldn't be an issue."

There you go. Maybe one of these days you'll say something relevant.
Exactly. If he was just your usual working class kid who joined up all these people justifying making this news by saying "We just need to highlight bigotry in the armed forces" wouldn't give a toss.
 
um he doesnt get to be king, and thank god for that.

whilst this gaffe is in the past, it is an unpleasant reminder of Harry pre going to Iraq.
 
um he doesnt get to be king, and thank god for that.

whilst this gaffe is in the past, it is an unpleasant reminder of Harry pre going to Iraq.
What if William abdicates? King Harry Racist von Nazi I? :lol:
chances are by the time William is old enough to make such a decision he will have a son/daughter or his own, old enough to take his place, short of William dying before he has a child, there is no way I can foresee Harry becoming king.

Hell as William matures in to a grown man, it becomes ever harder to picture Charles being king, and I dont mean that as a negative mark on Charles himself.
 
um he doesnt get to be king, and thank god for that.

whilst this gaffe is in the past, it is an unpleasant reminder of Harry pre going to Iraq.
What if William abdicates? King Harry Racist von Nazi I? :lol:
chances are by the time William is old enough to make such a decision he will have a son/daughter or his own, old enough to take his place, short of William dying before he has a child, there is no way I can foresee Harry becoming king.

Hell as William matures in to a grown man, it becomes ever harder to picture Charles being king, and I dont mean that as a negative mark on Charles himself.
I don't see Charles becoming King anyway, he's far too outspoken on his political opinions in what is essentially supposed to be a neutral role.
 
If he wasn't white, this wouldn't be an issue.

Here, let me fix that for you:

"If he wasn't a member of the royal family, this wouldn't be an issue."

There you go. Maybe one of these days you'll say something relevant.

I'm just calling it like it is. Double standards are a way of life for a lot of people, especially on issues of race (just look at all the racist crap Al Sharpton gets away with, and people go to him as authority on positive race relations?). And guess what? I'm not even white.

At least you didn't waste your precious time responding to an irrelevant post. You can always block me, you know.
 
Hell as William matures in to a grown man, it becomes ever harder to picture Charles being king, and I dont mean that as a negative mark on Charles himself.
I don't see Charles becoming King anyway, he's far too outspoken on his political opinions in what is essentially supposed to be a neutral role.
actually I am pretty fed up with the government right now & the Queen seems to do nothing, having a royal who actually has an opinon is something I would like to see.
 
Unless he dies before his mum, Chuckie will indeed be king, so you'll get your wish.
 
Unless he dies before his mum, Chuckie will indeed be king, so you'll get your wish.
Is that a certainty? I thought there was all this stuff with it being a problem for him to be head of the church for getting remarried and all the that stuff?
 
I'm just calling it like it is. Double standards are a way of life for a lot of people. And guess what? I'm not even white.

You always say "I'm not even white" as if that makes a difference and that making idiotic inflammatory comments that have no basis in reality are somehow okay because you're not part of the specific group in question.

Are you seriously so deluded as to believe that the reason this story is big news is that Prince Harry is white, and not because he's PRINCE Harry?

At least you didn't waste your precious time responding to an irrelevant post. You can always block me, you know.
No, I'd rather continue to point out your hateful and ignorant behavior as long as you continue threadshitting across the board with your whites as constant victims of persecution agenda.

And to respond to your edit:
"(just look at all the racist crap Al Sharpton gets away with, and people go to him as authority on positive race relations?)"

Most people I know of all races, political backgrounds, and beliefs consider Al Sharpton a massive joke. Just because he can muster up media coverage doesn't mean he's not a buffoon. You're like those people who post threads saying "PETA went off the deep end this time!" as if it's some major revelation to the vast majority of people that PETA took what was essentially a positive message and went completely overboard with it long ago. Thanks for the hot tip, Chet.
 
Unless he dies before his mum, Chuckie will indeed be king, so you'll get your wish.
at some stage I think the royal family needs to stop going from parent to child but grandparent to grandchild, it would mean skipping Charles or William, and I know its wrong to skip either of them, but I think its something that should be considered.

The royal family needs some young blood, the crown passing from one 60yrs old to the next is not something I would like to see, William will be plenty old enough when the Queen dies, it seems logical to skips Charles, and install William on the throne.
 
Unless he dies before his mum, Chuckie will indeed be king, so you'll get your wish.
at some stage I think the royal family needs to stop going from parent to child but grandparent to grandchild, it would mean skipping Charles or William, and I know its wrong to skip either of them, but I think its something that should be considered.

The royal family needs some young blood, the crown passing from one 60yrs old to the next is not something I would like to see, William will be plenty old enough when the Queen dies, it seems logical to skips Charles, and install William on the throne.
The thing is they can abdicate at any time, so it could easily go to a younger member within months of an older member getting it, doesn't have to be a life long office.
 
Unless he dies before his mum, Chuckie will indeed be king, so you'll get your wish.
at some stage I think the royal family needs to stop going from parent to child but grandparent to grandchild, it would mean skipping Charles or William, and I know its wrong to skip either of them, but I think its something that should be considered.

The royal family needs some young blood, the crown passing from one 60yrs old to the next is not something I would like to see, William will be plenty old enough when the Queen dies, it seems logical to skips Charles, and install William on the throne.
The thing is they can abdicate at any time, so it could easily go to a younger member within months of an older member getting it, doesn't have to be a life long office.
that is true, and if you do go from grandparent to grandchild there is a chance the grandkid will not be old enough, so the parent would have to hold the throne for them until they are.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top