Who really cares what the masses think, after all?
As long as we like it, who cares if everyone else does?
Who really cares what the masses think, after all?
As long as we like it, who cares if everyone else does?
...
Seven hundred episodes of Star Trek, regardless of quality, are just a lot more than most people have any interest in watching. Any good cop show can reach a much larger audience than a science fiction series.
Who really cares what the masses think, after all?
As long as we like it, who cares if everyone else does?
Because they'll never make it for us - there aren't enough Trek fans to make a TV series or movie profitable. Never have been, really - they always need to appeal to a broader audience.
Trek continued to be popular and in fact to grow a bit more in popularity after Roddenberry's death - this isn't a mass movement, and successful entertainment rarely has much to do with some philosophical "vision." And, of course, Abrams's version of Trek is the most successful movie in the franchise.
Seven hundred episodes of Star Trek, regardless of quality, are just a lot more than most people have any interest in watching. Any good cop show can reach a much larger audience than a science fiction series.
Mojo is what you gots, JustKate.Well, that's nice. It's always been fun for me, and what the heck is "mojo," anyway?![]()
BS you don't need Roddenberry or any one person to have their vision remain it's a legacy much bigger than he was and it's immortal unlike him. I sure wouldn't want any franchise to just be under one guy forever and ever look at what happened to Star Wars with Mr. Lucas and Trek with the killer B's people need to learn when to call it quits and just collect action figure revenue and let somebody else be creative.Anji said:Gene Roddenberry's death. No leader, no vision.
Who really cares what the masses think, after all?
As long as we like it, who cares if everyone else does?
...
Seven hundred episodes of Star Trek, regardless of quality, are just a lot more than most people have any interest in watching. Any good cop show can reach a much larger audience than a science fiction series.
Time to trade in my Kirk shirt for a T.J. Hooker uniform, right?
Nah. I'll stick with what I like and let the heavens fall.![]()
Captain Randy Hall wrote:
>>Time to trade in my Kirk shirt for a T.J. Hooker uniform, right?
Nah. I'll stick with what I like and let the heavens fall.<<
Dennis wrote:
>>The point is not that you should. The point is that there are a lot more of "them" than of us - always have been and there's no evidence or trend to suggest that it will change.<<
Uh, OK. I like my share of cop shows, too. But I'll take my science fiction from the top of my list.
>>Any good cop show can reach a much larger audience than a science fiction series.<<
And a cop show is hugely cheaper with no alien prosthetics or warp drive starships.
>>BTW, I didn't say Hooker was a good cop show.<<
I was comparing Shatner roles: Kirk or Hooker. I could never watch Hooker because I kept expecting Spock to step in and say, "Captain, you've enjoyed your research into 20th century law enforcement methods, but it's time to go back to the Enterprise. And Shatner would pick up his communicator and say "Two to beam up" and that would be the end of the series...
Trek lives long and prospers....![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.