Well Michael Turners been dead for a while now so we don't have to worry about him making any more 14 year olds look like play boy sex kittens no more.
It's ink on paper, surely if he can draw emotion out of us good or bad, because of some scribbling that means that he is more than doing his job, which in this case was to lull us into a fake sense of thrill while reading a hack writer plod on about titsplosions. Loeb can be good, but lately, the last half decade, he's been writing with the Kitchen sink approach, that by including 12 guest stars and 9 established fanfavourite villains in every issue it's as if he's padding his work with fluff, giving us what we think we want instead of giving us what we don't know what we want.
It's ink on paper, surely if he can draw emotion out of us good or bad, because of some scribbling that means that he is more than doing his job, which in this case was to lull us into a fake sense of thrill while reading a hack writer plod on about titsplosions. Loeb can be good, but lately, the last half decade, he's been writing with the Kitchen sink approach, that by including 12 guest stars and 9 established fanfavourite villains in every issue it's as if he's padding his work with fluff, giving us what we think we want instead of giving us what we don't know what we want.
Last edited:
