2 AU... 82AU... it'd all fit neatly into the Discovery Turbolift Funhouse!That's why I prefer the 2 AUs in the DE version. Still massive, but 82 just always seemed ridiculous to me.
2 AU... 82AU... it'd all fit neatly into the Discovery Turbolift Funhouse!That's why I prefer the 2 AUs in the DE version. Still massive, but 82 just always seemed ridiculous to me.
2 AU... 82AU... it'd all fit neatly into the Discovery Turbolift Funhouse!
I mean, Enterprise established that the 28th century or so, they had the ability to make things larger on the inside.
The only mode we ever saw was destructive digitization, and we saw it at three scales. And the climactic threat was that it was about to happen to the surface of the Earth at a fourth, larger scale, in order to remove the carbon unit infestation but presumably preserve the rest of the Creator's planet. It was never discussed, implied, hinted at that there was any other mode. So, to assume otherwise, we'd have to posit something that we have no evidence of.But V'ger wasn't necessarily destroying everything in its path. It was simply making digital images of its journey for "data storage". Perhaps the three Klingon ships, then Epsilon Nine, then Ilia, were the only times the actual specimens were removed from original existence. Removed because they were perceived as hostile.
I assume the larger, more distant things we saw in the Spock Walk, like whole planets and cosmic phenomena, were long-range imaging. But the things it encountered directly were digitized.
Yeah, I agree with @Charles Phipps. It had eaten everything Spock saw on the spacewalk. We'd only ever seen the digitizer operate in that one mode. Why assume there was another mode?I'm fairly sure V'Ger wiped out everything it encountered but space is pretty big even in Star Trek. It could travel through much of it with only a few enocunters.
That was the Backup Earth.
The story from an insider is that the turbolift funhouse came directly from Kurtzman himself despite protests from the art department who had already come up with their own internal layout for Disco which did not leave room for such a contraption.The only "explanation" is that Discovery's VFX team consistently ignores what the script and common sense say and does their own bizarre thing
It was a cool visual and sadly it makes no sense, sort of like Cetacean Ops.
Why in the world would Cetacean Ops not make sense? Dolphins and whales are now considered by most scientists to have intelligence comparable to humans. Surely the idea of Starfleet including the nonhuman sapient species that actually exist in real life is no less plausible than the idea of Starfleet including imaginary humanoid aliens.
Yeah, I agree with @Charles Phipps. It had eaten everything Spock saw on the spacewalk. We'd only ever seen the digitizer operate in that one mode. Why assume there was another mode?
Yeah, that's a good point. But Spock said the Epsilon IX space station was stored there "with every detail," no reference to any graininess. Spock theorized that he was in a gigantic imaging system, and, lo and behold, images were projected. I'm not sure what, if anything, can be concluded from the manner of projection, especially when the dialog asserts no lack of detail.Conversely, the only things we know it digitized received special emphasis in the presentation. Epsilon IX wasn't floating around with all the planets and moons and things, it was a grainy image inside the big mouth thing. Ilia was a massive statue.
Who knows, Cetacean Ops could take up a whole deck...
More in the Blackfish sense that a ship not specifically designed to allow them freedom of movement would be a hellish existence rather than Starfleet wouldn't have aquatic members. There's a reason that poor dolphin in Johnny Mnemonic is a drug addict. He's all cooped up in an aquarium.
Now I wonder what happened to the residents of Cetacean Ops when the Enterprise-D's saucer crashed in Generations.
And how many dolphins were lost in the Battle of Wolf 359, the Battle of Sector 001, and the various engagements of the Dominion War.
The Enterprise-D was so absurdly huge that it would've had plenty of room for them.
Although, prior to Lower Decks, the only time Cetacean Ops was actually referenced onscreen was in Yesterday's Enterprise, where the Enterprise is depicted as a warshipThe TNG Technical Manual says the cetaceans on the E-D were a "consultation crew" of researchers in theoretical navigation. The E-D was meant as a science ship first and foremost, and the Cerritos is a "second contact" ship meant for routine duties rather than combat. So there may not have been any cetacean crew on the combat vessels in the war, or on the frontline ships called in to battle the Borg.
Although, prior to Lower Decks, the only time Cetacean Ops was actually referenced onscreen was in Yesterday's Enterprise, where the Enterprise is depicted as a warship
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.