• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What's in your "head canon"?

Pfft. You don't think Three can do anything Two can't?

I'm riffing on Two's "you don't think there's anything you two can handle that I couldn't" bit from Five Doctors. But on a wider scale, I don't see any incarnation of the Doctor as stronger or weaker than another. The Master thinks like that "if the Doctor can be young and strong...." but even Missy admits in her retelling of the Doctor vs the Invisible Superstrong Android Assassins that it could be ANY version of the Doctor because they're all the same.

It’s the downside to making the Doctor more human in recent years. The ‘lonely god’ stuff is also annoying, but at least it made sense insofar as there were no other Time Lords.
The books always played into them as the oldest race, and particularly with the Doctor the idea that they were a bit like Tardis themselves. Their body something of a shell extruded into our dimension, a shadow of something more complex. Which again is a bit OTT, but is really just a way of explaining how different they are.
Boom tried for it with ‘I’m a complex space time event!’ but it didn’t entirely land because it’s been a while since we saw what that could mean. Moffat of course was big on it, with him having the Doctors grave on Trenzalore essentially containing a scar on space/time. (Which was in part lifted from the books anyway) And RTD had his ‘fixed points in time’ that he introduced, along with the idea that only a Time Lord could really mess with those. (Before having Time do its own thing, and put the Doctor back in his place.)

Fundamentally though, the Doctor is basically a demigod, almost in a classical sense — down from Olympus (Gallifrey) to interfere with the mortals. (It’s a constant thing in Who. Think of the ‘Game of Rassilon’ and compare it to films like ‘Clash of the Titans’)
It doesn’t matter that he currently looks like a five foot four tall shoe salesman, as you long as you believe that beneath it lies an old god.
Something Smith and Capaldi did very well.
Something I have so far yet to get from Gatwa.
But then, RTD is not the best for writing that, though he managed it more with Ecclestone than any other time he wrote the Doctor. Or maybe it is down to portrayal, and that’s why we mostly saw it in Tennant when he was being manic at the end of his first run.
 
I'm afraid everyone's been wrong all these years. This is the correct spelling for all the actors who have played the Doctor:
William Hartnelle
Patrick Troughtone
Jon Pertweee
Tom Bakere
Peter Davisone
Colin Bakere
Sylvester McCoye
Paul McGanne
Christopher Ecclestone
David Tennante
Matt Smithe
Peter Capaldie
Jodie Whittakere
Ncuti Gatwae
With Peter Cushinge as Doctor Who from the 1960s movies, Richard Hurndalle and David Bradleye playing recast versions of the First Doctor, Richard E Grante as the alternate Ninth Doctor from Scream of the Shalka, John Hurte as the War Doctor and Jo Martine as the Fugitive Doctor. And of course Rowan Atkinsone, Richard E Grante, Jim Broadbente, Hugh Grante, and Joanna Lumleye playing different Doctors in Curse of the Fatal Death.

:nyah: ;)
 
I'm afraid everyone's been wrong all these years. This is the correct spelling for all the actors who have played the Doctor:
William Hartnelle
Patrick Troughtone
Jon Pertweee
Tom Bakere
Peter Davisone
Colin Bakere
Sylvester McCoye
Paul McGanne
Christopher Ecclestone
David Tennante
Matt Smithe
Peter Capaldie
Jodie Whittakere
Ncuti Gatwae
With Peter Cushinge as Doctor Who from the 1960s movies, Richard Hurndalle and David Bradleye playing recast versions of the First Doctor, Richard E Grante as the alternate Ninth Doctor from Scream of the Shalka, John Hurte as the War Doctor and Jo Martine as the Fugitive Doctor. And of course Rowan Atkinsone, Richard E Grante, Jim Broadbente, Hugh Grante, and Joanna Lumleye playing different Doctors in Curse of the Fatal Death.

:nyah: ;)

Problem is, they *all* look better that way.
 
I think there's just some resistance to "forget everything you know" stories. When they change tbe rules on a whim. DC Comics, for example, likes to do that every few years with their constant reality-shattering crises.

Kind of like the thing about "bi-generation". I read about that, and I'm like, what the hell? Is this how ALL regeneration is supposed to work now? Or was it just that one time? And what happens to the 14th Doctor now? Does he just age and die like anyone else?
My understanding (which might be mistaken) is that bi-generation is the next two regenerations happening at once (and a very rare thing). So 14.5 (still-Tennant) and 15 (Gatwa) both come out at the same time, but 15 is nevertheless the incarnation after 14.5. So 14.5 goes on to move in with Donna’s family and live out the rest of his life, eventually disappearing in his next regeneration somewhere centuries down the line. Whereas 15 remembers all that, and goes on from there.
 
I'm not a huge fan of time travel stories especially if it's about moving back in time because is it even possible....
So, there was a time when I thought that maybe what happens in Doctor Who is actually someone on a holodeck having some fun. =)
 
I'm not a huge fan of time travel stories especially if it's about moving back in time because is it even possible....
So, there was a time when I thought that maybe what happens in Doctor Who is actually someone on a holodeck having some fun. =)
Well, being fiction, technically that’s pretty much what it is…
 
I’ve always assumed that over five hundred years pass for the Doctor between “The Deadly Assassin” and “The Face of Evil”.
I don't have my copy handy, but I think it was the 'Discontinuity Guide' that laid out a timeline regarding the Doctor's age and where in his travels he could age 100-500 years and the authors found the two spots where he could travel were between "The Deadly Assassin" and "The Face of Evil", and "The Armageddon Factor" and "Destiny of the Daleks". The authors also speculated that there were some unseen adventures between Season Twenty Two and The Trial of a Time Lord, where the Doctor traveled without Peri before picking up Mel.
 
Division altered the Doctor’s DNA once they were done using them for Division work.

They turned the Doctor into a Gallifreyan orphan and the Doctor eventually inherited a limited number of regenerations from Time Lord academy. Totally unaware that their former identity was responsible for the gift/ability.

I think it also fits with the theme of adoption and how some people who are adopted aren’t allowed access to “previous” parts of their identities or history.
 
Division altered the Doctor’s DNA once they were done using them for Division work.

They turned the Doctor into a Gallifreyan orphan and the Doctor eventually inherited a limited number of regenerations from Time Lord academy. Totally unaware that their former identity was responsible for the gift/ability.

I think it also fits with the theme of adoption and how some people who are adopted aren’t allowed access to “previous” parts of their identities or history.
I think that works perfectly.
 
Leon Colbert from "The Reign of Terror" is the War Chief from "The War Games" incognito and collecting humans to dump into his war zone...

Just like the Morbius Eight were, "The Fugitive Doctor" is The Doctor, prior to Hartnell. At the time of "Morbius", fans were questioning the Doctor's number count as well. Even more fun, she's not part of The Timeless Child storyline (any more than the Morbius Eight, Davison or McCoy or the others were) - TTC is just a rehashed origin story for the Doctor, one that didn't really need to be told and is a bit much, even by mid-80s standards. I wish Chibnall gave more time to Jo's Doctor than the contrived flapdoodle that TTC brought in as Jo's and Jodie's on-screen chemistry were marvelous, but at the same time, how he handled Jo not recognizing the future incarnation led to some great material as well.

Speaking of the Morbius Eight, the producer of "The Brain of Morbius" - Philip Hinchcliffe - has specified that those eight are the Doctor: https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/sci-f...ese eight,Hartnell incarnations of the Doctor. (No actors wanted their photos taken, oddly, so they had to get the writers and other staff to do it!) Add in the inference being that, in "The Deadly Assassin", the Doctor's lifespan was limited to 13 lives/12 regenerations, which now makes Tom Baker's the final one. Whatever was to happen regarding all of that must have been quietly dropped when Williams took over, with him and future showrunners adhering to Tom as being the 3rd regeneration, save for script editor Adams who'd have the Doctor (Tom) say a joke or two flippantly, as well as Romana going through more lives than (insert tame compariive allusion here)... even the 1996 TV movie fell in line. The modern era has a new hand, a new incarnation, a new set of (unspecified) lives, and more over its 19 year run so far.

Also, speaking of lore being quietly dropped and the show has done that plenty of times and usually worked because the new stories were superb and gave needed dramatic weight to the revised continuity: The Doctor being a product of experimentation is pretty gruesome - as well as explaining a backstory that takes away the fun of the mystery - but then add in the "some other dimension and came into ours" and the result is overkill that doesn't add anything, arguably removes the Doctor's mystery, and arguably doesn't need to be again, apart from - if anything - retconning it out as "Master made it up by tampering with the Matrix just enough". Given the Master's history of tampering with the Matrix, it's just as much a possibility. The show has dropped ideas after dropping them and will do so again. Oops, wait, let me get back into 20th century mode: "The show has mentioned ideas then never referred to them again". Just like the 1996 TV movie where the Doctor is now half-human and the eye of orion is now not a location in the galaxy but every tardis has one and regenerations can be ported by hooking them up into an optometrist's chair and-- ugh, the 1996 TVM's only saving Grace, apart from characters of Grace and Chang, was the character of the new Doctor. Gloss over the plot and there's still enjoyment to be had for the most part, thanks to the three of them.

Lastly, the TARDIS has a perception filter - which is why Ian and Barbara perceive his having only one heart. That broke down one day as well, just like the camouflage/chameleon circuit had, and the Doctor did steal the ship at a point when the ship was starting to suffer malfunctions, and learned to repair what was needed most later on. Never mind the retcon that, due to telepathic circuits (now being used more than as a communications device), imagine all the TARDISes (TARDii?) getting Time Lords to do who knows what... no thanks, the show still needs some rules and self-imposed credibility, which is why humor works. Unlike the lengths seasons 17 and 24 went to where, among everything else, the comedy didn't land...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top