There are more moral nuances in the situation in Insurrection than either the writers realized or a one sentence reduction "Six hundred people selfishly monopolizing a resource" can describe.
Pure utilitarian arguments that the needs of billions outweigh the needs of six hundred could be extended to defend slavery or doctors experimenting on patients without their knowledge or consent. And situations where one group forcefully relocates another group to economize their resources have certain historical parallels which were obviously how the writers were trying to frame the moral argument.
Most of the time when a group invokes 'The needs of the many' as a moral defense, they just happen to be a member of said 'Many', and are intending to force their will on the 'Few'.
Pure utilitarian arguments that the needs of billions outweigh the needs of six hundred could be extended to defend slavery or doctors experimenting on patients without their knowledge or consent. And situations where one group forcefully relocates another group to economize their resources have certain historical parallels which were obviously how the writers were trying to frame the moral argument.
Most of the time when a group invokes 'The needs of the many' as a moral defense, they just happen to be a member of said 'Many', and are intending to force their will on the 'Few'.