Orci's statement can only be considered if it is not in conflict with what the movie itself establishes. But let's return to that.No. As Orci's statement makes clear, Marcus intended the torpedoes to work, and he was in control of them by the time they were given to Kirk. He would know whether or not they were capable of performing their intended purpose.
Not really - as the warheads are still there. The lives would end when the torpedoes detonate; it would be irrelevant whether the torpedoes would move from A to B before detonation.this question becomes utterly nonsensical in the event that Kirk thinks the torpedoes don't actually have fuel.
Now that's interesting! (And a damn shame Chrissie refuses to do a transcript of ST:ID on her excellent page...) But one would suppose about 95% of the fuel would have to be gone anyway, as the cryotubes are later shown and are quite bulky - i.e. no way to fit fuel around the legs of the icemen, inside their body cavities etc. They must take up basically all the space provided by the original fuel tank, unless TARDIS tech is involved, or unless 95% of the original tank design was dedicated to something else besides fuel already.But the actual dialogue is "This fuel container's been removed from the torpedo and retrofitted to hide this cryotube."
It doesn't appear realistic that the torps could reach the Klingon planet, then.
I mean, Kirk was going to fire the weapons from their supposed greatest standoff range, right? Why go an inch closer to the Klingons? But the specs are wrong now, with most of the fuel gone. Or if the specs now match Khan's modifications, then all pretense of "long range" must be gone, yet Kirk never indicates he finds "long range" a misnomer for the specs.
Timo Saloniemi