My concern was always that they would lose all the momentum they picked up from the mainstream audiences who won't come back for the new one because they've moved on to other things.
I nominate Many Coto and the Reeves-Stevenses. They know Trek. They love Trek, And they would give Trek the primacy and respect it deserves as a property.
One hands over reins, not reigns.
Oh please. Star Trek (2009) was a love-letter to Trek and the fans.
JJ Abrams and his writing team have lavished the kind of care and attention that the Trek property hasn't seen since the days of Nicholas Meyer and Harve Bennett.
The difference is, Abrams has managed to turn Trek into a tentpole feature.
So no, Abrams isn't going to lose the Trek property, he'll leave it on his own terms.
So, with 27 responses so far there's unanimous disagreement with the OP.
Impressive.
So, with 27 responses so far there's unanimous disagreement with the OP.
Impressive.
Impressive maybe in the sense that it showcases the strength of the Cult of JJ and how fashionable it is to hate everything that came before his "interpretation" of Trek.
So, with 27 responses so far there's unanimous disagreement with the OP.
Impressive.
Impressive maybe in the sense that it showcases the strength of the Cult of JJ.
There was four years between INS and NEM. Obviously the length of time between films has absolutely NOTHING to do with quality.
That's an impressive load of crap.
Under no circumstances does liking Abrams' Star Trek mean hating what came before.
(emphasis mine)Oh please. Star Trek (2009) was a love-letter to Trek and the fans.
More like "Bend over and grab your ankles..."
JJ Abrams and his writing team have lavished the kind of care and attention that the Trek property hasn't seen since the days of Nicholas Meyer and Harve Bennett.
By turning it into Paramount's version of Star Wars. Trek 09 was enjoyable as a generally noisy, shallow action flick full of run and jump and "pew pew pew". At best it's Trek-lite.
The difference is, Abrams has managed to turn Trek into a tentpole feature.
By sexing it up, dumbing it down, and throwing in a ton of fake lens flares.
So no, Abrams isn't going to lose the Trek property, he'll leave it on his own terms.
You're probably right, but it's a shame. Trek could be much more than what it has been turned into. And produced on a faster schedule.
Ian, how old are you? Or, perhaps more to the point: in what year did you first start watching Star Trek? Which movie or series?So, with 27 responses so far there's unanimous disagreement with the OP.
Impressive.
Impressive maybe in the sense that it showcases the strength of the Cult of JJ and how fashionable it is to hate everything that came before his "interpretation" of Trek.
I'm a fan of classic Trek and current Trek. I think the majority here are too. Go figure.So, with 27 responses so far there's unanimous disagreement with the OP.
Impressive.
Impressive maybe in the sense that it showcases the strength of the Cult of JJ and how fashionable it is to hate everything that came before his "interpretation" of Trek.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.