Anyone read the review on ugo.com? An utter rave from a die-hard trekkie. Very promising
...see the thing for yourselves...
^uh, will dvds suffice, Sam?
oh, and six movies.
![]()
^ Actually, your comments were a little uncalled for. STC's response was to your, "Stop bitching and go see the damned thing yourself!"
Kinda hard when it isn't out yet!
Then you responded with some gibberish about DVDs and six movies.
Weird.
Sorry, this sounds just a little too much like "two wrongs do make a right" for my liking. (emphasis mine)The problem is that haters have been hating this movie without seeing it AND bashing those who are optimistic. The term hater is justified when they call people "traitors" and say "anyone who likes JJ Abram's movie is not a real Trek fan".
Sorry, this sounds just a little too much like "two wrongs do make a right" for my liking. (emphasis mine)The problem is that haters have been hating this movie without seeing it AND bashing those who are optimistic. The term hater is justified when they call people "traitors" and say "anyone who likes JJ Abram's movie is not a real Trek fan".
I'm pretty well-acquainted with world history, though I have chosen more and more to ignore the network nightly news. Is it not a reasonable expectation? Very well, then: I'll just be unreasonable.Sorry, this sounds just a little too much like "two wrongs do make a right" for my liking. (emphasis mine)The problem is that haters have been hating this movie without seeing it AND bashing those who are optimistic. The term hater is justified when they call people "traitors" and say "anyone who likes JJ Abram's movie is not a real Trek fan".
That's one way to look at it.
It's not reasonable, though, to expect that when people are insulted and ridiculed that even most of them will respond with understanding and kindness. To say "well, mature adults would" with a straight face pretty much requires ignoring the greater part of world history as well as the network nightly news.![]()
I'm pretty well-acquainted with world history, though I have chosen more and more to ignore the network nightly news. Is it not a reasonable expectation?
It's only OK when they do it, not when I (or others respond). Funny how it always works that way, huh?I'm pretty well-acquainted with world history, though I have chosen more and more to ignore the network nightly news. Is it not a reasonable expectation?
Hang around any ER on a Saturday night and just ask the folks in the waiting area "what happened?" You'll come away with at least one appalling story about Adults Behaving Badly, and probably several.![]()
I am unapologetic in my optimism, in fact, Star Trek's message of OPTIMISM is the reason I became a TOS fan so many years ago.
I'd prefer people quote the rest of my post, since it is the most important part:
I am unapologetic in my optimism, in fact, Star Trek's message of OPTIMISM is the reason I became a TOS fan so many years ago.
No, it isn't okay when they do it, either, and it's still not a valid excuse for responding in kind. Just don't do it. And that will be all for this side-topic in-thread; anything further can go to PM.It's only OK when they do it, not when I (or others respond). Funny how it always works that way, huh?I'm pretty well-acquainted with world history, though I have chosen more and more to ignore the network nightly news. Is it not a reasonable expectation?
Hang around any ER on a Saturday night and just ask the folks in the waiting area "what happened?" You'll come away with at least one appalling story about Adults Behaving Badly, and probably several.![]()
![]()
I was fine with that part.I'd prefer people quote the rest of my post, since it is the most important part:
I am unapologetic in my optimism, in fact, Star Trek's message of OPTIMISM is the reason I became a TOS fan so many years ago.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.