Maybe I'm being harsh and nit-picky, but I really dislike how this ep casts Captain Tracey as a villain. This guy is supposed to be one of the most experienced captains in Starfleet. Whatever that means, he comes across more like a Klingon than a member of the Federation star service.
Perhaps not surprising, the Exeter is yet another Federation starship (joining the Excalibur, the Constellation, and the Valiant; to be joined the following year by the Defiant) that falls victim to some catastrophe where either the ship is lost or the crew winds up dead.
Perhaps not surprising, the Exeter is yet another Federation starship (joining the Excalibur, the Constellation, and the Valiant; to be joined the following year by the Defiant) that falls victim to some catastrophe where either the ship is lost or the crew winds up dead.
The Valiant? Are you talking about the S.S.Valiant that was lost a few hundred years before? I wouldn't really count that. Maybe you were referring to the Intrepid which you left off the list? The one with all those smart Vulcans that were eaten by the space amoeba?
No, I'm speaking of the U.S.S. Valiant, mentioned as having been lost 50 years before in "A Taste of Armageddon".
Which jibes well with the idea that starship captains are untouchable psychopaths all. Kirk, Tracey and Decker certainly fit the profile, with the same autocratic attitude to life, the universe and everything: how could rules touch them when they don't even acknowledge their existence, not when it really matters?(Keep in mind that in "Court Martial", it was put forth that Starfleet is such an exceptional organization that no starship captain has ever been successfully prosecuted.)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.