Heh.

You mean, except for the Catholic Church that makes it a focus of pilgrimages and devotion?But the shroud has never been bought or sold by anyone. It has been protected by believers in it's authenticity in the face of danger and even death. No one has ever tried to profit from it's existence.
Not really. Some sources mention "a cloth", but there is no way to link it specifically to the Shroud of Turin.
You mean, like Jesus with short curly hair? Or Jesus clean-shaven? Or Jesus with blond hair? Early church iconography is all over the place.
Well, if you have heard it, it must be true.
Doubts cast by Catholic Church researchers. Shocker!
So the usual jump from "we don't know" to "it must be God!". Not really surprising. I don't know who chipped the bumper of my car yesterday. It must have been God! Damn it, can't He drive straight anymore?
And what about the fact that the image in the verso is a few inches longer than the recto. Like the TARDIS is bigger on the inside, Jesus was longer in the backside?
Maybe you should. I for one could use a good laugh.
Not to mention the time and attention that the media dedicates to it. They used to keep it in the open all the time, but then they realized that they could rise the profits (both in money and in attention) by carefully controlled "shows".The Shroud of Turin is one of those things that makes money. LOTS of money.
Let's also not forget the amount of money in tourist income that will be made by this showing.
To all of that...all I can say...is just...one...big...![]()
After reading your responses and then noting your location, I am not the least bit shocked of your attitude and position. Oklahoma is, after all, the Buckle of the Bible Belt, where people are downright convinced that the Bible is the source for the Constitution of the United States. The the State Legislature just passed a law allowing the Bible to be taught as an elective, as the supporters of the bill firmly believe the 10 Commandments are the basis of all US law.
Basically, people here gravitate to Sarah Palin and her "all that science malarkey stuff" comments.
What if they find unicorns on the Ark?Everyone would be angry he didn't save the unicorns.
What if they find unicorns on the Ark?
Let's say a documentary crew along with a well respected scientist were given persmission to climb Mt Ararat and seek Noah's Ark. They eventually locate it and video and photograph their find.
The ship is huge and many stalls and cages are found within it. It is located high up on the mountain and along with it are found human artifacts such as tools and pots that date the same age as the wood of the Ark. The measurements of it are exactly as the Bible describes.
Would this discovery cause many to doubt their religion and brace Christianity? Would its discovery be seen as one of the most important dsicoveries in human history?
After reading your responses and then noting your location, I am not the least bit shocked of your attitude and position. Oklahoma is, after all, the Buckle of the Bible Belt, where people are downright convinced that the Bible is the source for the Constitution of the United States. The the State Legislature just passed a law allowing the Bible to be taught as an elective, as the supporters of the bill firmly believe the 10 Commandments are the basis of all US law.
Basically, people here gravitate to Sarah Palin and her "all that science malarkey stuff" comments.
. Not even close when it comes to me, buddy.
I'm guessing at least one fanatical group will try to destroy it.
After reading your responses and then noting your location, I am not the least bit shocked of your attitude and position. Oklahoma is, after all, the Buckle of the Bible Belt, where people are downright convinced that the Bible is the source for the Constitution of the United States. The the State Legislature just passed a law allowing the Bible to be taught as an elective, as the supporters of the bill firmly believe the 10 Commandments are the basis of all US law.
Basically, people here gravitate to Sarah Palin and her "all that science malarkey stuff" comments.
. Not even close when it comes to me, buddy.
Then why are you so upset that people here cast doubt on the Noah myth? Are you not aware the the Christian Bible is *not* the oldest written historical record, and that many of its premises are actually borrowed from other historical myths?
Ryan's Signature said:Sign the Manhattan Declaration: http://www.manhattandeclaration.org
. Not even close when it comes to me, buddy.
Then why are you so upset that people here cast doubt on the Noah myth? Are you not aware the the Christian Bible is *not* the oldest written historical record, and that many of its premises are actually borrowed from other historical myths?
Not only that, but Ryan's own signature links to the very type of Christianity that you mentioned earlier.
Ryan's Signature said:Sign the Manhattan Declaration: http://www.manhattandeclaration.org
Would this discovery cause many to doubt their religion and brace Christianity? Would its discovery be seen as one of the most important dsicoveries in human history?
Not to a great degree, as the Ark and Noah feature in Judaism and Islam.
The existence of Jesus Christ is not a matter of debate.
Sure it is. There's little to no historical evidence he even existed.
Forget Noah's Ark! What if someone found THIS one?
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.