See, I could also live with having Janeway having paid for her time-travelry in "Endgame" by having Admiral Janeway's death karmicly balance it out, especially if we take for granted that those actions were part of a predestination paradox.
So again, it feels like Janeway's death wasn't portrayed well-enough to feel necessary and therefore did indeed feel gratuitous. And, again, I'm not likely at all to read it, not as a boycott of this, but because I'm simply picky which Trek books and stories I choose to read.
Imagine if it had been Picard, a far less controversial (and ergo, probably more universally beloved) figure. The uproar would have been even more deafening.
So again, it feels like Janeway's death wasn't portrayed well-enough to feel necessary and therefore did indeed feel gratuitous. And, again, I'm not likely at all to read it, not as a boycott of this, but because I'm simply picky which Trek books and stories I choose to read.
Imagine if it had been Picard, a far less controversial (and ergo, probably more universally beloved) figure. The uproar would have been even more deafening.