• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What if "Adam and Eve" Existed, Were Space Pioneers?

Joshua Howard

Captain
Captain
This hit me while I was commuting the other day, and it really makes sense.

I am coming at this from a rather agnostic perspective, so please forgive me if I say anything here that might conflict with the more faith-based view of human origins. It isn't intended.

On one hand we have science suggesting that human-like creatures lived many, many years before any written recorded history. On the other hand, we have myth, legend, and faith teaching things that seem to have been passed down from a common point somewhere around 5-6K years ago. All of these traditional teachings suggest that the human race began not long before recorded history started appearing.

Now, what if there once were human-like (but non-human) creatures living on earth, which were extinct. At some point after that - rather long after - the planet was seeded with a civilized, human couple - Adam and Eve - who were placed here for the express purpose of founding a civilization. They would have arrived with knowledge of a system of social code, but without any formal code of law. They would have lived off of the land without any help from outside, and within a generation or two, all remembrance of the old, civilized way of life would have been lost.

Those of you who are familiar with the Genesis account will recall additional tidbits which fall in line with this theory; the concept of a protective zone - the "Garden of Eden" which kept Adam and Eve safe from whatever might be outside; the concept of God walking with them, and a tree of life. All of these could have been metaphorical of someone checking to see how the settlers were doing in the early days, a regenerative food source, etc.

If this theory holds any water, it could be revolutionary. It means that our history doesn't end a few thousand years ago with a million year blank. It means that we might actually have some ancestory beyond Earth. It means that when/if the day comes when we are visited openly by Aliens, those aliens may look like us and share our DNA.
 
<Smells a thinly disguised "intelligent design" topic, or 1/2 dozen over ripe "Twilight Zone" episode endings. Either way, it's bad.
 
At some point after that - rather long after - the planet was seeded with a civilized, human couple - Adam and Eve - who were placed here for the express purpose of founding a civilization. They would have arrived with knowledge of a system of social code, but without any formal code of law. They would have lived off of the land without any help from outside, and within a generation or two, all remembrance of the old, civilized way of life would have been lost.

Congratulations! You've just invented one of the most hackneyed sci-fi plots of all time! It was already a cliche when The Twilight Zone did it in 1963.



On one hand we have science suggesting that human-like creatures lived many, many years before any written recorded history. On the other hand, we have myth, legend, and faith teaching things that seem to have been passed down from a common point somewhere around 5-6K years ago. All of these traditional teachings suggest that the human race began not long before recorded history started appearing.

Hardly "all." Just the Western mythological tradition. Hindu and Jain mythology, for instance, teach that the universe has always existed and gone through many cycles thousands or millions of years long, with humans being part of all of them.


Now, what if there once were human-like (but non-human) creatures living on earth, which were extinct.

Genetic research has proven conclusively that humans are close genetic relatives of all other primates. Our genes are over 98% identical to that of a chimpanzee, 80% identical to that of a mouse. And if you count variations on the same genes, rather than just identical genes, the similarity of mice and men rises to 99%. We have at least some genes in common with every other life form on the planet. There is absolutely no question that we evolved from Earth's indigenous biosphere.



If this theory holds any water, it could be revolutionary. It means that our history doesn't end a few thousand years ago with a million year blank. It means that we might actually have some ancestory beyond Earth. It means that when/if the day comes when we are visited openly by Aliens, those aliens may look like us and share our DNA.

Mmm, nope. Our history actually stretches back a lot farther than that, thanks to countless archaeological sites as well as genetic studies tracing back the shared origins of distinct human populations. And keep in mind that the mythology of the Fertile Crescent represents only one of many human traditions. There are many, many creation myths around the world -- South Asian, East Asian, African, indigenous Australian, Polynesian, Native American -- that have nothing in common with Genesis (or the Babylonian Enuma Elish creation myth of which Genesis was a monotheistically redacted version).
 
Maybe aliens came and augmented the DNA of the most advanced primate on Earth at the time to refine it and help give it a boost, for some reason. Maybe to make it taste better, like we did with breeding cattle.

That's why there are no Neanderthals anymore, because they were artificially mutated into Cro-Magnons.

One day the Lizard people will return to Earth to harvest and eat us.

But first they'd have to befriend us and win our trust. They could disguise themselves as Humans and give themselves a friendly-sounding name, like the "Visitors".

Wait... OMG. :eek:
 
There are many, many creation myths around the world -- South Asian, East Asian, African, indigenous Australian, Polynesian, Native American -- that have nothing in common with Genesis (or the Babylonian Enuma Elish creation myth of which Genesis was a monotheistically redacted version).
I wouldn't call Genesis a redaction of Enuma Elish. They have a few things in common (the primordial sea is the one that I remember) pointing towards a common oral tradition, but "redaction" implies that someone sat down with the Enuma Elish and rewrote it for the purpose of injecting monotheism. The editors who assembled Genesis were working with texts that were already monotheistic or henotheistic.
 
At some point after that - rather long after - the planet was seeded with a civilized, human couple - Adam and Eve - who were placed here for the express purpose of founding a civilization. They would have arrived with knowledge of a system of social code, but without any formal code of law. They would have lived off of the land without any help from outside, and within a generation or two, all remembrance of the old, civilized way of life would have been lost.

Congratulations! You've just invented one of the most hackneyed sci-fi plots of all time! It was already a cliche when The Twilight Zone did it in 1963.


I think it was Iain Banks who once commented (paraphrase): "Every now and again some serious literary magazine decides to hold a science fiction short story competition, to prove they can do it better than 'those hacks'. And as the judges haven't actually read any science fiction since they were eight, they think that 'Two crashlanded survivors turn out to be called Adam and Eve' is breathtakingly original, and give it first prize."
 
The amount of inbreeding would probably be 10000x worse as it is in the Britain's Royal family.
 
I think it was Iain Banks who once commented (paraphrase): "Every now and again some serious literary magazine decides to hold a science fiction short story competition, to prove they can do it better than 'those hacks'. And as the judges haven't actually read any science fiction since they were eight, they think that 'Two crashlanded survivors turn out to be called Adam and Eve' is breathtakingly original, and give it first prize."

A while ago I was at a book fair with signings, and I was seated next to an author who'd never written science fiction and had no interest in it, and had written a book that he insisted wasn't science fiction, but was a real extrapolation into the future from where things were going today. He was so proud of his predictions of the environment and economy falling apart and corporations running everything and so forth as this wildly original, meaningful insight that I didn't have the heart to tell him he was just rehashing tropes that had been hackneyed in SF for decades already.
 
Yeah, my first sale to Amazing (Analog? Can't recall -- it was '87) was actually a poem that went:

The planet was Earth, he's Adam, she's Eve.
That's what the man wrote, or so I believe.
The visiting spacers, one Smith and one Jones
Are merely red herrings for us hapeless clones.
It's trite and it's hokey, it's schtick and it's pat.
Oh, when will these writers learn where it's at?

(something else I can't recall clearly)

I can see it now -- If I mix it all in,
Hugos and Nebulas and Campbells I'd win.
Then Ellison'd tell me (I could bank on that)
"It's trite and it's schtick, kid, learn where it's at."
 
I think it was Iain Banks who once commented (paraphrase): "Every now and again some serious literary magazine decides to hold a science fiction short story competition, to prove they can do it better than 'those hacks'. And as the judges haven't actually read any science fiction since they were eight, they think that 'Two crashlanded survivors turn out to be called Adam and Eve' is breathtakingly original, and give it first prize."

A while ago I was at a book fair with signings, and I was seated next to an author who'd never written science fiction and had no interest in it, and had written a book that he insisted wasn't science fiction, but was a real extrapolation into the future from where things were going today. He was so proud of his predictions of the environment and economy falling apart and corporations running everything and so forth as this wildly original, meaningful insight that I didn't have the heart to tell him he was just rehashing tropes that had been hackneyed in SF for decades already.

If you hadn't said 'He', I'd have wagered money you were sitting next to Jeanette Winterston (whose last book IS NOT SCIENCE FICTION! Got that? Even though it's set on a space ship, and Carl Sagan did it better as the last episode of Cosmos).
 
I always like the section in Ansible called 'As Others See Us', where, for example, famous authors talk about how their latest book isn't SF. The prime example is Margaret Attwood, talking about her novel Oryx and Craik: "This isn't really science fiction, because science fiction is 'talking squids in outer space'." Wha?
 
I always like the section in Ansible called 'As Others See Us', where, for example, famous authors talk about how their latest book isn't SF. The prime example is Margaret Attwood, talking about her novel Oryx and Craik: "This isn't really science fiction, because science fiction is 'talking squids in outer space'." Wha?

Okay, this is fun. Pity there only seem to be a half-dozen or so possible hits on the page. I especially like this one.

As Others See J.K. Rowling Readers. 'Probably best to come clean here and admit that I have not read the Harry Potter books. I bought them for my daughter and speed-read a paragraph or two, but I swiftly came to the conclusion that if I was ever going to get into this kind of thing, it would have happened as a teenager. And I'd have doubtless nabbed myself a nice Dungeons & Dragons-playing boyfriend into the bargain. I imagine he would have been called Clive and we would have been blissfully happy, attending Trekkie conventions together.' (Barbara Ellen, The Observer, 2 March) [PS]
 
All of us should read Ansible. It's great. Wins all those Hugos for a reason. :)

As Others Reposition Us. According to Publishers Lunch, a US deal is being lined up for bestselling French author Jean-Christophe Rufin's Globalia, reported as a speculative novel which 'steps into the future, not exactly as science fiction but as a projection of today's American-dominated world toward what he calls "totalitarian democracy".' No talking squids in outer space there.
 
I'm baffled that someone could know enough about DNA to know it can show a phylogenetic relationship, yet still think it's possible that protohumans were aliens.

Also, this is the plot of "Women of the Prehistoric Planet," which is just as Godawful as you'd expect.

As Others See Us. Alfonso Cuaron, director of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Whatsit, may next write and direct an sf film, Children of Men -- presumably based on the not very good P.D. James novel. With the usual disclaimer: 'It's not really science-fiction. It's the world 30 years from now, in which for 18 years no human child has been born, for unknown reasons. Civilizations are falling apart. England is the last remaining civilization as we know it, because it's an island that's insulated itself from Europe, which is in civil wars and complete pandemonium. So the story takes place in that context.

Teehee. I agree that Children of Men isn't science fiction.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top