• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What could a future earth space ship look like.

^It isn't - Wikipedia has that built-in search function which makes it easy to find any of their relatively easily read articles. It's a pretty good site when it comes to the kind of things discussed on non-expert fora -like this one :)
 
Lasers are what have be used now, you never know. Plus I said I could add more engines, what ever floats yout boat.

Sorry I don't consider Wiki(which can be changed by anybody) to be a valid source for scientific information.
Wikipedia is an excellent starting place for information. As long as you follow it up with footnotes/references.
P.S.S I said you could take out the solar part if you want. ^ thats article's title is Solar Sails. Try to find something not a blog site.

You only show your ignorance of the subject with that statement. I recommend you read the article to at least get the basics of the subject.
 
Someone said we might have something that looks like the NX-01 (no FTL drive) in about 150-200 years. I say it makes no sense, because again--the ship wouldn't be propelled in the same manner.
I was the person who said that, and only in the sense of a vehicle with a forward command section and aft engine pods. Never said anything about it looking exactly like the NX-class, because the command section could be anything from a sphere, to something angular, to something bullet-shaped, IMO.
 
^lol, that's even worse! now what is your sail using for a medium? Space based lasers are your only choice now, and they obviously won't be available in unexplored star systems.

I'm a bit dubious myself whether or not laser propulsion in the proposed sense would even work. The literature on it implies that practical limitations can be overcome by the fact that a ground-based power station can be immense, but I personally doubt you can ever design one big enough to make it workable.

It could kinda work as a launch system, though, using a laser beam to superheat the air behind a vehicle or even using laser power beaming to support some kind of thermo-electric booster system.
 
^lol, that's even worse! now what is your sail using for a medium? Space based lasers are your only choice now, and they obviously won't be available in unexplored star systems.

I'm a bit dubious myself whether or not laser propulsion in the proposed sense would even work. The literature on it implies that practical limitations can be overcome by the fact that a ground-based power station can be immense, but I personally doubt you can ever design one big enough to make it workable.

It could kinda work as a launch system, though, using a laser beam to superheat the air behind a vehicle or even using laser power beaming to support some kind of thermo-electric booster system.

Have a read of Buzz Aldrin's Encounter with Tiber, where the sections about the alien space expeditions includes hefty detail on the use of lasers to boost solar sail spacecraft... both at launch, and destination deceleration.
 
^ That's actually just what I had in mind. I think either Aldrin or one of his advisors is taking a piss on this one, or maybe just throwing it out there because its fanciful. Didn't seem all that well thought out to me.
 
All this "but we can't imagine what we'll discover in the future, so anything is possible" stuff sounds vaguely familiar to me.

Can we rig up a sail to work with magnets?
 
^ Well, depending on the specs they are potentially faster than ion engines. Admittedly, that isn't saying much, but if you're sending an unmanned space craft you can afford to be patient.

Not really, because you've got men waiting behind on Earth, waiting for the results of the mission.

Men are impatient.
 
Intra-solar system transits won't be that slow, I'm predicting. Since there are plenty of big heavy objects to slingshot round and since a bit of forethought will choose the optimum time to make a journey, times can be cut drastically without using a shedload of fuel.
 
This might be a slightly mad idea/question, but would it be possible/feasible to use a catapult type station to 'throw' ships and probes to impart extra delta-v to the craft without adding mass to said craft? Obviously this is a somewhat one way set up, unless you happen to have an equivalent station at the destination planet (so setting up a 'relay' system on each planet in the system could be possible) and the craft would have to have the necessary delta-v to decelerate at it's target destination.

Essentially the station's throwing apparatus would be like a trebuchet, with the payload craft on the long arm and the other arm would be some kind of thrust module to spin the whole set up, or a counterweight, if the set up has the whole apparatus as only a section of a station and the station itself spins the apparatus with large scale motors. Once the desired amount of spin is achieved, the craft is released in the correct direction.

I imagine the problems with this kind of set up would include:
-Keeping the station stable to get an accurate 'throw'.
-Structural stresses upon the station and quite likely the craft as well.
-Accuracy of 'throwing' the craft.
 
This might be a slightly mad idea/question, but would it be possible/feasible to use a catapult type station to 'throw' ships and probes /.../

Didn't NASA once play with this thought?
I remember watching an animation on TV where this kind of system was installed in orbit around Earth and the moon.
 
You only show your ignorance of the subject with that statement. I recommend you read the article to at least get the basics of the subject.

My ignorance, really name calling. Like I said Wiki is not a valid source of information, while some of it maybe true, the fact that anyone can go in there and write their own bias is why its not a valid source, links and references included. It was banned and blocked by many schools in my state for those reasons. Now will I go to a scientific website, yes and I plan too.
However, its my design, one of many and I will not change it. I am truly sorry that you have lost all imagination, hopefully, one day you realize why I said this.
 
^So now your saying even the links and references from wikipedia are no good!?!?! So, this is fake:
http://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Solsail.htm
and this:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/smallsats/nanosaild.html
this one too:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/26jun_nanosaild/

and all the rest:
External links

30px-Commons-logo.svg.png
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Solar sails

????

Dude, wikipedia is a fine source of information, just don't use it as your only source of information.

I haven't lost imagination, I just temper it with knowledge.
 
Yeah, that whole "Wikipedia is no valid source because it can be changed by everyone" is getting tiresome already. Wikipedia is a fine source. There is a version control, you can look up all the changes made to the article, and it references the actual sources of information. Scientific articles that matter are mostly written by scientists anyway and don't contain bullshit. And you can always double check.
 
Heres a pratical ship, that is from a movie yes, but the one I drew up is similar enough. It from the Red Planet.
 
Last edited:
Using a trebuchet design would be a bit "Rube Goldbergian". Just build a giant mass driver in space.

I suggest the trebuchet design as an alternative to mass drivers, since I'm under the impression that mass drivers suffer from massive heat build up, even when used in atmospheres, so I could imagine that such a heat build up in void vacuum could be highly dangerous. I suppose however that if the launches where rare, or if the cooling technique is improved, mass drivers again come up ahead.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top