Actually, that 's how I've tried to explain the classic series to some people. "Forget it's a low budget TV show, think of it as a televised stage play instead."
It's theater. There. Problem solved.The problem with The Web Planet is that no sane script editor should ever have commissioned it, because the technology to make it just didn't fucking exist... And if it had, it would have cost ten times the season's budget to do right...
So would it also be okay if the actors were to always project their lines loudly like in theatre?
So would it also be okay if the actors were to always project their lines loudly like in theatre?
Haven't you noticed? They pretty much do.
So would it also be okay if the actors were to always project their lines loudly like in theatre?
Haven't you noticed? They pretty much do.
Even TOS DW managed not to commit that particular blunder.![]()
Haven't you noticed? They pretty much do.
Even TOS DW managed not to commit that particular blunder.![]()
Except where Stephen Thorne, the bloke who plays the Pirate Captain, and (by definition) Brian Blessed are concerned
It's theater. There. Problem solved.The problem with The Web Planet is that no sane script editor should ever have commissioned it, because the technology to make it just didn't fucking exist... And if it had, it would have cost ten times the season's budget to do right...
So would it also be okay if the actors were to always project their lines loudly like in theatre?
And your comparison falls flat. Theatre only does unrealistic scenery and props when it's part of the pre-existing creative conceit of a given production's genre to not be realistic -- for instance, Epic Theatre, examples of which most famously involve the plays of Epic Theatre's creator, Bertolt Brecht (Mother Courage and Her Children, The Caucasian Chalk Circle, etc). Original Series Doctor Who, by contrast, tends to set its episodes up as being part of the Realism/Naturalism genre -- realistic, detailed sets that re-create the appearances of real sets, characters that dress in a manner similar to real people, etc. -- and then to break that conceit by using special and visual effects that utterly violate the creative conceits of Realism/Naturalism, thereby fatally undermining the verisimilitude of the program.
Sorry, but you don't get to apply the creative conceits of one medium or one genre and apply them inconsistently, or to another medium or genre.
Genesis of the Daleks.
I AM a new fan, and "Genesis" was the second Classic show i ever watched (after "The Five Doctors"), and of what i've seen so far (essentially the whole Davros-stuff) it's one of the best.
And yet I just did.Sorry, but you don't get to apply the creative conceits of one medium or one genre and apply them inconsistently, or to another medium or genre.
That was the episode that turned me onto Doctor Who when I saw it at Penulticon in 1979. The problem was not with Genesis but with bringing Davros back to life and using him again.Genesis of the Daleks.
I AM a new fan, and "Genesis" was the second Classic show i ever watched (after "The Five Doctors"), and of what i've seen so far (essentially the whole Davros-stuff) it's one of the best.
Except it turned the Daleks into mindless robots for all subsequent stories (with the exception of maybe Remembrance), hence my dislike for it.
The OP was for 'new' fans, so I would prefer they got used to the classic Dalek treatment before launching into the Davros years.
It's theater. There. Problem solved.
So would it also be okay if the actors were to always project their lines loudly like in theatre?
And your comparison falls flat. Theatre only does unrealistic scenery and props when it's part of the pre-existing creative conceit of a given production's genre to not be realistic -- for instance, Epic Theatre, examples of which most famously involve the plays of Epic Theatre's creator, Bertolt Brecht (Mother Courage and Her Children, The Caucasian Chalk Circle, etc). Original Series Doctor Who, by contrast, tends to set its episodes up as being part of the Realism/Naturalism genre -- realistic, detailed sets that re-create the appearances of real sets, characters that dress in a manner similar to real people, etc. -- and then to break that conceit by using special and visual effects that utterly violate the creative conceits of Realism/Naturalism, thereby fatally undermining the verisimilitude of the program.
Sorry, but you don't get to apply the creative conceits of one medium or one genre and apply them inconsistently, or to another medium or genre.
Only you would come along and take what is clearly an off-hand, joking remark and make it into an issue where you get to lecture us all once again. I can't understand why people crucify Bone for having an intelligent, informed and accurate opinion when yours are amongst the most holier-than-thou, self-righteous, "look at me, I'm so fucking smart" pieces of crap I've ever seen on any forum. Sci, you have the most over-inflated sense of self-importance and self-worth I've ever come across online.
Personally, I liked the Twin Dilemma, but that's just me. I'm a huge Sixth Doctor Fan, so I know I'm in the minority, LOL.
Oh... that reminds me. Avoid Happiness Patrol until you've made it through the best of the show. I was on a roll watching the Seventh Doctor's eps in order until I got to that episode and I just... ugh, lost all interest. I really *must* make myself go back and watch it sometime.
I do highly recommend avoiding Dimensions in Time like the plague. *shudders*
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.