• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Exactly. How parochial does someone have to be, to take more than 1/10 of a second to absorb the fact that a woman's name is Michael and then move on without confusion or comment?

Heh, not everyone is American. Many of us come from a culture with a gendered language. Here, a woman called "Michel" would be confusing, as would a man called "Michelle". Same with translations, obviously.

No reason to start launching into conspiracy theories about the person's genitals, but still confusing.

(not considering the existence of non-American cultures seems parochial as well, by the way)
 
Heh, not everyone is American. Many of us come from a culture with a gendered language. Here, a woman called "Michel" would be confusing, as would a man called "Michelle". Same with translations, obviously.

No reason to start launching into conspiracy theories about the person's genitals, but still confusing.

(not considering the existence of non-American cultures seems parochial as well, by the way)

I'm not American and I have no problems accepting a female character with a traditionally masculine name.

Plus since you mentioned French...what of the old French (and German) custom to name a boy, for example Francois-Marie (Or Markus Maria in German)? Or French names that have traditionally been given to both men and women, like Claude or Camille?

From that basis it would be easy to extrapolate that in Burnham's time and culture, Michael has simply become a unisex name, even if you don't know that there are already women named Michael in America.
 
Not sure it this opinion qualifies as "controversial" for purposes of this thread, but I've yet to hear from anyone else who shares it, so here goes: I didn't particularly want Voyager to make it home by the end of the series; it seemed obvious and predictable. I wanted them to adapt a little more to their situation (perhaps consider becoming a generation ship? The dearth of pairings-off and the lack of children suggested that they were not at all considering that the journey might take a while), and embrace the journey more. I wouldn't have objected to the last scene being a shot of the ship traveling through Delta space, with the words "and the adventure continues" across the screen.
 
The crew of Voyager could have used a long session with T'Hain and the Vulcan Dictates of Poetics. A lot of things that the characters did (and failed to do) didn't make sense. A few off the top of my head...
Janeway was all across the board. One minute she's separating Tuvix by force and demanding that the Doctor use Evil Cardie medical knowledge to cure B'Elanna over her protests. The next, she's letting the Doctor experience memories that could kill him (and indirectly the rest of the crew).
Harry is home on Earth, engaged, and this close to early promotion. What does he do? Risks life and limb to return to eternal ensignhood on a stranded tin can 70 years from home.
You're really going to tell me that not one, NOT ONE member of the crew chose to stay on the relatively safe 37's planet, opting instead for a very long, very dangerous journey through the Delta Quadrant? This included pregnant Ensign Wildman, passed-over Lt. Carey, and the Maquis crew who weren't adjusting to Starfleet life that well.
And yes, there was no pairing off, even though they were proceeding on the assumption that their journey would take decades instead of years.
 
The bridge from "The Cage(TOS)" is better-looking and more advanced in appearance than the regular series bridge.
 
The bridge from "The Cage(TOS)" is better-looking and more advanced in appearance than the regular series bridge.
Hmm. I'd have to think about what I think of that one.

BUT

I can see visually going straight from the bridge in "The Cage" to the bridge in TMP with no problem at all. The aesthetic of "The Cage" with the silver-interiors and the blue/gold/tan uniforms makes it look a lot closer to TMP. It makes me think this is the color-scheme Gene Roddenberry really wanted to go with before NBC said, "add some color!" Granted, I prefer colorful TOS, but it's easy to connect the dots with his preferred intentions here.
 
And yes, there was no pairing off, even though they were proceeding on the assumption that their journey would take decades instead of years.
Especially with the Vulcans. It's only logical to figure that, even if it is super private, still requires consideration, instead of "Oops, Vorik went in to pon farr! Who knew?"
 
My latest controversial opinion is that I think season 3 of Discovery was the worst of the series thus far. I’ve noticed tons of praise for it online and even here, but, I thought the season was weak, poorly-written, and lacked focus. The show is just all over the place.
 
Yeah, the lighting choices in that film were...strange.
They had to darken it. That was the TV bridge, and it would have looked like shit on a theater screen. You would have seen the duct tape and all the other stuff you shouldn't see. It was lit dark to hide that.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top