I think with Trek our motto should be "Stop Making Sense." Or . . . stop trying to make it make sense?
More "we're telling a story for humans so it is not going to make perfect sense." Some elements are always going to be dramatic conceit, just like Star Wars having monobiome worlds.I think with Trek our motto should be "Stop Making Sense." Or . . . stop trying to make it make sense?
I think with Trek our motto should be "Stop Making Sense." Or . . . stop trying to make it make sense?
Looks like Girlfriend is Better is my ear worm for the day.
Could be worse.
![]()
But then anything goes, and you could end up with things like beings who evolve in an area completely devoid of light, yet have eyes…
That Roddenberry was a tyrant that nearly killed the franchise until he was fired from it after the second season of TNG.
He and Hurley were fired at the end of Season 02. They said that his health was why he left, that wasn’t true.Tyrant is harsh. That he felt proprietary regarding the concept is natural I think. Then you have to consider that movie-wise, from TWOK onwards he’d essentially been fenced out of his own creation.
I think he saw TNG as a way of reestablishing his own vision for Star Trek and those first few seasons (for better or worse) are about as close as we ever got to a ‘pure’ distillation of his concept.
I think he was slowly degrading mentally as he approached the end of his life. I guess he had a strict idea about what Star Trek should be but I wouldn’t go as far as calling him a tyrant.
Also I don’t believe he was fired from TNG? Not sure where you got that one from?
You could immediately tell when Roddenberry wasn’t around in TNG because the weird obsession he had with Wil Wheaton/Wesley was over.
I always found Roddenberry and Hurely’s obsession with Wheaton to even cross the line as far as being appropriate.
You can’t see? If I were Wil Wheaton, I would have felt very, very uncomfortable with them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.