• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Yeah, I adore George Takei. I really do. He came to my city about ten years ago to make a very productive personal appearance after a local politician made a very tasteless remark about Syrian refugees and how refugees from other cultures and from wars are trouble. He's one of my favorite TOS actors.

But damn, he needs to stop throwing gasoline on the fire and keeping the feud with Shatner going. William Shatner's no saint but some of this is George's own fault for being so whiny about on-set actor decisions and favoritism that happened DECADES ago and didn't really adversely affect Takei's career. He's done just fine. Shatner can be an egomaniac and was selfish at times, but a lot of other actors can also be attention hogs and place their own egos ahead of burying hatchets.
It gets the clicks and likes.
 
No, other way around. Fontana wrote the original Farpoint mystery and then, when it expanded to a two-hour show, Roddenberry wrote the Q parts. Fontana didn't like the Q parts, not because she disliked John deLancie or even the character of Q, but because she felt it didn't mesh with her original Farpoint story. She talks about this in her interview during Shatner's "Chaos on the Bridge" documentary.
Yup, I've got the second draft script of Farpoint in my collection, which pre-dates the addition of Q. Placed at the back of the script are new pages for the first couple acts that have Q, which are a match for rough draft script pages from Roddenberry's word processor before it was sent to the typist for distribution.
 
I grew up with STAR TREK, the original series. TNG came out when I was in high school I've loved all of it. Until 2009. I thought the J.J. Abrams movies were okay, certainly not bad. ST Beyond even felt more like a Trek story than the previous two. Now.... Section 31 is the first ever version of Trek that I will refer to as Trash. It's that bad to me.
 
Yup, I've got the second draft script of Farpoint in my collection, which pre-dates the addition of Q. Placed at the back of the script are new pages for the first couple acts that have Q, which are a match for rough draft script pages from Roddenberry's word processor before it was sent to the typist for distribution.
I would love to see that. Do you know if there is a digitized copy available online anywhere?
 
I grew up with STAR TREK, the original series. TNG came out when I was in high school I've loved all of it. Until 2009. I thought the J.J. Abrams movies were okay, certainly not bad. ST Beyond even felt more like a Trek story than the previous two. Now.... Section 31 is the first ever version of Trek that I will refer to as Trash. It's that bad to me.
kc9prmw.gif
 
But damn, he needs to stop throwing gasoline on the fire and keeping the feud with Shatner going.
Honestly, calling it a "feud" at this point is pretty generous. I hardly ever* see Shatner respond in kind to Takei's constant attacks, because let's face it, he's got a lot more going on and doesn't need to keep bringing up old stuff like that to get people to pay attention to him. If Takei ever finds himself near a microphone, chances are he's saying something derogatory about Shatner at some point.

*I say "hardly ever" because I did once personally witness Shatner make a joke at Takei's expense, and even then it was pretty mild. At a Q&A before a screening of TWOK, Shatner was asked which other part he'd like to play on Star Trek besides Kirk. Shatner immediately responded, "Sulu, so I wouldn't have to put up with George Takei!" :lol:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top