What Wesley did in journey's end is far beyond being a ass. He easily could have gotten people killed and even have restarted a major war.I rather thought Wesley was a complete and utter ass in "Journey's End".
What Wesley did in journey's end is far beyond being a ass. He easily could have gotten people killed and even have restarted a major war.I rather thought Wesley was a complete and utter ass in "Journey's End".
I get the impression the Enterprise was the first to try it out. Their mission was for ten years, so the crew needed their families around, ten years is a loooong time. However considering the enemy can blow your ship out of the sky and kill a whole family or turn you into zombies, seems like a dangerous idea to me. But then Starfleet ain't military its 'Wagon train' for the stars.Does anybody know whether or not the Enterprise was the only ship in the fleet that had children on board or was it supposed to me a more common thing? If it was then, jeez, the battle of Wolf 359 was certainly a less than cheery footnote in their history.
And I maintain that. What Wesley did in JE was criminal, not being a ass.Er...aren't you the one who just said Wesley was never a complete and utter ass?
Only if badder means lamer.
Wesley had a doting mother, who never ditched her child with a abusive uncle.
Wesley was a only child.
Wesley had a early lack of confidence.
Wesley becomes part of a ship's crew prior to joining the academy.
Wesley (while occasionally annoying) was never a complete and utter ass.
It was nonsense indeed. How ridiculous was it that the great big flagship of the mighty Starfleet had a kid, and a civilian one at that, at the steering wheel? And to think that in a ship with a crew of a 1000+, Picard couldn't find a qualified Starfleet Academy graduate to man the helm.And it is nonsense. There were trained professionals on the Enterprise, people who had been through Starfleet Academy, who could sit at the nav console. And Picard entrusts the piloting of his ship to an amateur? Wesley was obviously talented at what he did, and from an "Economy of Characters" standpoint the decision to put Wesley on the bridge makes production sense, but in itself was a nonsensical decision.
Next Generation was an often excellent show, but Wesley is symbolic of how it never really lived up to its promise.
It wasn't just "Journey's End" that left a bad taste in the audience's mouths. I remember one of the early episodes of season 1, the one where Wesley was a member of the landing party to a planet where the natives were half naked, wearing skimpy clothes. Wesley committed a capital offense by breaking a seemingly silly law.I rather thought Wesley was a complete and utter ass in "Journey's End".
And a bit of a gullible putz in "The First Duty".
Similarly, I think the biggest problem with "Acting Ensign Crusher" was that he was the only character with that designation that we ever saw before or since. If they had established that A/ENS was a regularly used rank and had a few others cameo occassionally (maybe even have Wes socialise with them in his off hours) I don't think it would have addressed all the complaints about the character I think it would've helped as would more characters like Tarses IMO
Funny, but I never had a problem with that line. I took it as a young kid with an idealized view of Starfleet trying to step up to a serious situation. Had the line come from another character, maybe it would have been sour with me, as well.On the other hand, his, "I'm with Starfleet, we don't lie," line was horrible.
.
After faux-Tom Paris got that cadet killed and they covered it up, isn't that pretty much what Picard says to Wesley when he knows he's lying? "The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth, whether it's scientific truth, or historical truth, or personal truth!"On the other hand, his, "I'm with Starfleet, we don't lie," line was horrible.
After faux-Tom Paris got that cadet killed and they covered it up...
I bet Picard/Stewart relished every moment of that scene. Oh, the drama. He was at his best, or most annoying (depending on your perspective), when he was on his moral high horse, lecturing to us all.After faux-Tom Paris got that cadet killed and they covered it up, isn't that pretty much what Picard says to Wesley when he knows he's lying? "The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth, whether it's scientific truth, or historical truth, or personal truth!"
If only they had written a Picard Speech for Wes there. Of course that would steal food off Stewart's table.
Now, I am going to get on my moral high horse. For the death of a fellow cadet and the subsequent cover up, Wesley should have been expelled from the Academy along with Locarno.As I understand it, the original plan was to use the character of Locarno from The First Duty as Voyager's pilot, but a combination of a thought that Locarno's actions were too "irredemable" and RW money issues (IIRC, they'd have to pay royalities to RDM and/or Neren Shankar - the writers of TFD - for every episode that Locarno appeared in, whereas using Paris sidesteps this (IIRC, T'Pol replaced T'Pau as an ENT regular for similar reasons?) meant that it made to use a newish character instead.
As he was.I might have taken it that way if he was a few years younger. As it was, he just came off as hopelessly naive.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.