Number6 said:
Regardless. This will be resolved fairly soon..
So, does this mean that Abrams won't be directing full time? When you are directing a movie of this magnitude, do you even have time for downtime? It kind of sounds like to me that the film may not be Abrams' number one priority right now, but that may just be me looking into it too much.J.J. Abrams ranks among the multihyphenates [writers who also direct and/or produce] caught in the crossfire of a writers strike hitting just as he’s set to start helming a feature, Par’s “Star Trek” franchise revival that’s set to begin lensing Wednesday. Abrams said he would honor his contractual obligation to work as a director on the pic but would render no writing services. And in his downtime, he plans to spend time on Melrose Avenue joining such chants as “Who’s got more money than they can count? Paramount.”
“If I didn’t stand with my fellow writers, I’d feel it in my gut,” Abrams said.
Kokomo said:
From Trekmovie.com
So, does this mean that Abrams won't be directing full time? When you are directing a movie of this magnitude, do you even have time for downtime? It kind of sounds like to me that the film may not be Abrams' number one priority right now, but that may just be me looking into it too much.J.J. Abrams ranks among the multihyphenates [writers who also direct and/or produce] caught in the crossfire of a writers strike hitting just as he’s set to start helming a feature, Par’s “Star Trek” franchise revival that’s set to begin lensing Wednesday. Abrams said he would honor his contractual obligation to work as a director on the pic but would render no writing services. And in his downtime, he plans to spend time on Melrose Avenue joining such chants as “Who’s got more money than they can count? Paramount.”
“If I didn’t stand with my fellow writers, I’d feel it in my gut,” Abrams said.
Works for me! :thumbsup:Noname Given said:
Star Trek XI pricipal photography production will not be affected; and Abrams will direct.
Jackson_Roykirk said:
Isn't it not uncommon to have minor re-writes of some scenes during the filming of a movie?
Would this be allowed under the union rules?
That is what I am worried about as wellBabaganoosh said:
Since Abrams obviously sympathizes with the strikers (and at times, he *is* one), can we trust him to still give all of his ability to directing the film? He wouldn't just sort of make a half-hearted effort and coast through it - out of spite, or because he doesn't want to be there...would he?![]()
Kokomo said:
That is what I am worried about as wellBabaganoosh said:
Since Abrams obviously sympathizes with the strikers (and at times, he *is* one), can we trust him to still give all of his ability to directing the film? He wouldn't just sort of make a half-hearted effort and coast through it - out of spite, or because he doesn't want to be there...would he?![]()
![]()
Number6 said:
Abrams signed a deal with Paramount under the condition that he gets to make a Star Trek film.
All indications is that he wants to make this film.
Randy1012 said:
He could slack off, but that wouldn't be very professional of him, plus it would be a betrayal of his artistic integrity
and a betrayal of all the other people who are working hard to make the best film that they can.
J.J. Abrams is not a writer on this film; he's a director. He should be professional enough to do the job he's been tasked with, no matter how he feels about the writers' situation. Anyone who lets their feelings about the writers' strike affect their work as an actor, or a director, or an editor, and so on, shouldn't have a place to come back to in Hollywood after the strike is over.Babaganoosh said:
That's the problem. He's got two artistic integrities to worry about - one as a writer, the other as a director. What happens when they are in direct conflict with each other? He has to pick which side he's going to be on. Strike or work? You can't do both. He is going to have to deal with the simmering anger (common to all strikers) 'infecting' his still existing job as a director. How's that gonna work?Randy1012 said:
He could slack off, but that wouldn't be very professional of him, plus it would be a betrayal of his artistic integrity
I really hope that you are right - I want this film to be awesome! I have been waiting waaaaaay too long for itRandy1012 said:
J.J. Abrams is not a writer on this film; he's a director. He should be professional enough to do the job he's been tasked with, no matter how he feels about the writers' situation. Anyone who lets their feelings about the writers' strike affect their work as an actor, or a director, or an editor, and so on, shouldn't have a place to come back to in Hollywood after the strike is over.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.