• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

WB's Justice League 2017 movie pre-discussion thread

Jax said:
In my head I would of done The Batman after MoS and then a follow up movie after JL introducing Nightwing & Batgirl because I would of kill Batman at the end of JL 2 when Darkseid makes his move on Earth in person and is stopped by the League. Batgirl could of taken the mantle up of protecting Gotham herself and also lay the grounds for a Gotham City Sirens project.
Click to expand...

We are all very glad that you are not in charge.
 
It really annoys me WB didn't follow MoS with a standalone Batman movie to set up BvS as what would of been better to kick start the DCEU than a Superman/Batman trilogy story.
Click to expand...


When I first heard the news about "Batman v. Superman", I thought that WB should have followed up with a second Superman movie or a Batman solo movie. But when I saw the 2016 film, I quickly understood why Snyder had followed up with a Superman/Batman film.
 
I thought they were similar to their training costumes from the WW movie and not the ones they wear in battle?
 
Jax said:
Right back at ya pal ;)



If I may ask why do you think they followed up with the BvS movie?
Click to expand...

The movie's plot basically revolved around the fallout from the events of "Man of Steel" . . . especially the Black Zero Event. It was this event that really introduced Superman to the world. For Bruce Wayne, it was this event that led to his determination to kill Superman. For Lex Luthor, it was Superman's introduction that led to his determination to do the same.

Well, they aren't wrong about the Amazons being in more revealing outfits than in WW's own movie. You don't run into a fight with an exposed midriff unless you're invulnerable to bullets.
Click to expand...

Are the bikinis their battle uniforms, their training uniforms or merely costumes for a publicity photo?
 
Last edited:
Captaindemotion said:
The review embargo has been lifted. The Hollywood Reporter is scathing but while I'm dismissive of the "anti-DCEU" critics conspiracy theories, it's hard not to conclude that this critic was dying to sink the boot in
Click to expand...

Make a good film, get a good review. It's not Rocket Science.
 
StCoop said:
Make a good film, get a good review. It's not Rocket Science.
Click to expand...

I’ll certainly grant you that 2/2 stinking reviews so far doesn’t look good (I hadn’t seen the Telegraph review when I initially posted the THR one) but there can be all sorts of subjective factors that go into reviews. The late Philip French from the Observer was respected as one of the most knowledgeable film critics in Britain but he gave EVERY SINGLE Star Wars film a bad review. The nearest he got to praise was when reviewing the 1997 re-release of ESB was to say “well, I suppose it’s the best of them.”

Edit. Sadly the more genre-friendly Collider is only a little more positive than the other two reviews: http://collider.com/justice-league-...um=social&utm_campaign=collidersocial/#poster
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top