Was It Possible To Please Even More Trek Fans?

[Roger Wilco]

Not at all. If you'll look in TNZ, we have a spirited, equal and realistic debate between parties. We're being open minded, and willing to listen to one another. That is how one stays neutral in The Neutral Zone. It's a balance, but we manage. All are welcome.

I agree, TNZ is just the place to go for the hardcore-fans who resent Abrams' raping the canon, to have a civilised debate without being laughed at.

 

[Amaris]

Not at all. If you'll look in TNZ, we have a spirited, equal and realistic debate between parties. We're being open minded, and willing to listen to one another. That is how one stays neutral in The Neutral Zone. It's a balance, but we manage. All are welcome.

I agree, TNZ is just the place to go for the hardcore-fans who resent Abrams' raping the canon, to have a civilised debate without being laughed at.

I mean, it's only fair. Whether intentionally or not, they do get pushed around here. At least in TNZ we all look eye to eye. That's the way it should be.

J.

 

[EnsignRicky]

I wasn't at all a fan of Vulcan's destruction either. But for me what would have made it way better, is if they had just had the balls to do a straight up reboot, let Nimoy enjoy his retirement and give the new cast the opportunity to launch under their own steam. It also would have avoided all the canon violations and allowed a lot more people to just sit back and enjoy it for what it was.

no
That would have been better for you, but that would have lessened the impact for most everyone else.
If it wasn't Vulcan, it would've had no impact.
It would be like that planet in Star Wars, so inconsequential I can't even recall its name.

No you agree that it's better for me? whatever your point, please don't use me as an opportunity to slide in a backhanded Star Wars remark. Especially when even my grandmother could probably name the insignificant planet that appears to have slipped your mind.