My only complain is Kirk dying by complete accident.
Was it a mistake to kill Kirk in Star Trek Generations? This article seems to think so, saying it was a move made without foresight that harmed the franchise long term:
I'm fine with it. Kirk died to save millions of people who would never know what he did. That's pretty damn heroic.
However, considering all the possibilities of time travel they could've done with the Nexus, Picard could've picked a better situation to jump into and wouldn't have even needed Kirk.
Yeah, like soon enough to warn his brother and nephew not to do whatever got them burned to a crisp...
Then he could have Soran arrested and put into the brig for a couple of days... and this is it!
I tend to think he could only exit into the real world in a place the nexus has been in its travels, at the time it was there, and this was the only time we know of that it was at a planet.
GUINAN: But as I said, time has no meaning here. So if you leave you can go anywhere, any time.
GUINAN: But as I said, time has no meaning here. So if you leave you can go anywhere, any time.
Kirk's death should've been him sitting in the Captain's chair fulfilling his dream of commanding a vessel again.
Honestly, that just sounds regressive, cliched, and boring. One of the things I liked about the beginning of this film is that he looks like he’s itching to sit in the captain’s chair on the Enterprise B. But when he finally sits in it he realizes it’s not his place, and that the real captain should be there. It’s a nice bit a growth from what he did in TMP where he shoved Decker aside from the chair. He’s no longer the obsessive captain that felt he needed command. That’s not to say his actual death worked, but I think the filmmakers could have done a lot better than just having consoles explode in Shatner’s face.
I think you are on to something there. While I am not 100% certain how I want Kirk to die (maybe I don't) I do think that the idea of just exploding on the bridge misses a lot of his growth, from TUC onward.Honestly, that just sounds regressive, cliched, and boring. One of the things I liked about the beginning of this film is that he looks like he’s itching to sit in the captain’s chair on the Enterprise B. But when he finally sits in it he realizes it’s not his place, and that the real captain should be there. It’s a nice bit a growth from what he did in TMP where he shoved Decker aside from the chair. He’s no longer the obsessive captain that felt he needed command. That’s not to say his actual death worked, but I think the filmmakers could have done a lot better than just having consoles explode in Shatner’s face.
Well, it was his metaphorical first day on the job, or so it appeared, and hardly ideal captaining circumstances. His leisurely cruise first became a major media event and then a rescue crisis.
I think you are on to something there. While I am not 100% certain how I want Kirk to die (maybe I don't) I do think that the idea of just exploding on the bridge misses a lot of his growth, from TUC onward.
I mentioned that Kor had a better exit, and realize that what makes it impactful is that we don’t see his actual death happen. It’s left to our imaginations how he was able to accomplish his mission and sacrifice himself, and that makes it more powerful.
I dunno if that would work for a MOVIE, it definitely needed to feel grand in a sense. A more mythical type of death you hear told in stories.
Fair enough.
Perhaps a “Yesterday’s Enterprise” story really would have been the best if it weren’t taken. Just seeing the Enterprise-A enter the vortex and we can only imagine how Kirk and the crew went out in a battle.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.