• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Violent natural phenomena--what countr(ies) have the worst?

Nerys Ghemor

Vice Admiral
Admiral
One thing I have always wondered about...I dunno if there's any way to quantify it, but what country or countries get screwed over the worst by Mother Nature, as far as being subject to the most violence from weather and seismic activity?

Personally, the US, Japan, and Indonesia come to mind--would these indeed be some of the worst cases? I mean, does every country have to put up with as much crap from nature as these three do?
 
Good question.

If you include animals that will poison or kill you then I'd in Australia too - everything there seems to what to kill you :)

There was an island, in the Caribbean I think, whose name I've unfortunately forgotten that was rendered completely uninhabitable a few years ago when the volcano it had grown up around erupted. The island was a British colony, and did have quite a large population. I think they were all able to evacuate though.

And there are towns in the U.S that have been completely destroyed by hurricanes.

I'm not sure how to rate the worst.
 
I think there needs to be some way to control for the size of the country. For example, one natural disaster per year in some place like Lichtenstein would be much more, based on percentage of the country affected, than one natural disaster per year in Canada.

Perhaps the relative severity of various natural disasters should be weighted as well. How does an earthquake compare to a flood, fire, hurricane, etc?
 
I think as far as gut-wrenching fear-inducement, not much could have beaten the tsunami off the coast of Thailand on Boxing Day, whatever year that was.
 
I think it's kind of hard to say. Pretty much every place on Earth has is own brand of ugliness and has the potential to be something really nasty.

And, if you live in a area where such events are commonplace, you tend to get used to them.

Actually, I think it would be interesting to see what everyone considers the "worst" natural disaster.

I seem to recall reading that, psychologically, people are less prone to be afraid of what they are used to--or rather, what is typical for the region they live in.

In other words, if you live on a fault, Earthquakes are no big deal, but you tend to fear hurricanes or tornadoes. If you live on a tropical island, hurricanes are no big deal, but you're afraid of earthquakes and volcanoes. So on and so forth.
 
I think it's kind of hard to say. Pretty much every place on Earth has is own brand of ugliness and has the potential to be something really nasty.

The United Kingdom doesn't have much by way of catastophic natural phenomena. Which is why the whole country grinds to a halt if there's a heavy snow fall, or flooding. :p
 
Good question.

If you include animals that will poison or kill you then I'd in Australia too - everything there seems to what to kill you :)

There was an island, in the Caribbean I think, whose name I've unfortunately forgotten that was rendered completely uninhabitable a few years ago when the volcano it had grown up around erupted. The island was a British colony, and did have quite a large population. I think they were all able to evacuate though.

And there are towns in the U.S that have been completely destroyed by hurricanes.

I'm not sure how to rate the worst.

I believe the island concerned was Montserrat. I think only part of the island was evacuated but that included the capital where most of the population lived.

Edited to add the following on Montserrat from Wikipedia

In July 1995, Montserrat's Soufnere Hills volcano, dormant throughout recorded history, rumbled to life and began an eruption which eventually buried the island's capital, Plymouth, in more than 12 metres (39 ft) of mud, destroyed its airport and docking facilities, and rendered the southern half of the island uninhabitable. Following the destruction of Plymouth, more than half of the population left the island due to the economic disruption and lack of housing. After a period of regular eruptive events during the late 1990s including one on June 25, 1997 in which 19 people lost their lives, the volcano's activity in recent years has been confined mostly to infrequent ventings of ash into the uninhabited areas in the south. However, this ash venting does occasionally extend into the populated areas of the northern and western parts of the island. As an example, on May 20, 2006, the lava dome that had been slowly building partially collapsed, resulting in an ashfall of about an 2.5 cm (1 inch) in Old Towne and parts of Olveston. There were no injuries or significant property damage. The southern part of the island is currently off limits to the population because of the volcano, and trespassers caught in the restricted area are subject to fines.
Long referred to as "The Emerald Isle of the Caribbean" for both its Irish heritage and its resemblance to coastal Ireland, most of Montserrat today remains lush and green. A new airport at Geralds in the north (renamed the John A Osborne International Airport in 2008),was opened officially by the Princess Royal Princess Anne in February 2005, received its first commercial flights on July 11, 2005 , and docking facilities are in place at Little Bay, where a new capital is being constructed out of reach of any further volcanic activity.
The people of Montserrat were granted full residency rights in the United Kingdom in 1998, and citizenship was granted in 2002
 
Thanks for that, Miss Chicken. I knew the name began with M but was blanking on the rest of it - I'm glad it wasn't the entire island that was destroyed. I remember all the news broadcasts while the eruption was occurring.
 
I remember the island's name by nicknaming it "Monster Rat". Once you have an image of a gigantic rat in front of a erupting volcano it is impossible to ever forget the name of the island.
 
I don't really know. I'm going to guess around India and to the east of India near the coast (Bangladesh, Myanmar, etc.). They all seem to get quite a bit of bad stuff. Especially the monsoons from the Bay.

In other words, if you live on a fault, Earthquakes are no big deal, but you tend to fear hurricanes or tornadoes. If you live on a tropical island, hurricanes are no big deal, but you're afraid of earthquakes and volcanoes. So on and so forth.

That must be why I fear everything but wildfires!
 
I'd have to say Iran and China. It seems like they both have an earthquake every year that registers like 6.5 on the Richter scale and kills hundreds of thousands of people. We get a 6.5 earthquake and our books fall off the shelf. They get a 6.5 and millions are dead and homeless. China's annual flooding kills a great deal of people too. Maybe they just have more to kill though.
 
I'd have to say Iran and China. It seems like they both have an earthquake every year that registers like 6.5 on the Richter scale and kills hundreds of thousands of people. We get a 6.5 earthquake and our books fall off the shelf. They get a 6.5 and millions are dead and homeless. China's annual flooding kills a great deal of people too. Maybe they just have more to kill though.

With the earthquakes--I would say part of that likely has to do with construction codes in those areas.

US and Japanese construction companies have to hold to very strict standards in earthquake-prone areas, which definitely helps with reducing casualties.
 
I think China "wins" in terms of number of deaths from natural disasters, but that has more to do with population density than sheer number of disasters (although it's pretty high up on the list in that respect as well).

Bangladesh probably has the most natural disasters, but that's just a guess on my part.

According to the Center for Research and Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) in Belgium in 2000, the Philippines is the country hit by the most disasters (the Philippines was hit by an average of 10 disasters a year since 1991), however, they also include man-made events like wars and terrorist attacks, so that kind of skews the results. Of course you can also argue that a lot of "natural" disasters are anything but and are at least partially influenced by man, so it's up to you whether or not to include it.

The Philippines is the most disaster prone country in the world. It is known for its Mount Pinatubo eruption, disastrous typhoons, floods, garbage and land slides in Metro Manila, and for the war in Mindanao. At the end of the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (1990-2000), the Philippines was still at the top of the list of countries hit by disasters, as recorded by the Center for Research and Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) in Belgium. These records show that the Philippines was hit by an average of 10 disasters a year since 1991 compared to 8 disasters a year from 1900 to 1991.
http://www.adpc.ait.ac.th/pdr-sea/cbdo-dr/chapter1.html
(link is dead, but I found the quote on Google)
Here's another link that discusses the results:
http://www.bulatlat.com/news/4-27/4-27-prone.html
 
Good lord! That's a really scary amount of natural disasters. Although, lord, I think the worst is man-made - garbage slides, that makes me shudder.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top