• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

? USS ?

which do you prefer


  • Total voters
    34
Use of two terms starting with "Star" seems redundant and clumsy to me especially in the context of "USS".
So you’d prefer United Federation of Planets Starfleet Ship?

If they’re being formal, anything less than starship or spaceship might be a faux pas.
 
Starship does not refer to only Starfleet ships. Nor does Starfleet only refer to space/star-ships. There’s no redundancy in UFP Starfleet Starship.

In the 1964 pitch, the Yorktown's prefix was just 'S.S.'. The pitch didn't say what it stood for, but presumedly it was Spaceship or Starship.

It seems onscreen that USS is only used in reference to a Starfleet ship and SD reserved for civilian craft
 
Should have gone with "United Systems" instead of United Federation of Planets. The we could have had United Systems Starfleet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sci
Should have gone with "United Systems" instead of United Federation of Planets. The we could have had United Systems Starfleet.

United Star Federation. Then you could still call it "the Federation" colloquially, but the canon "United Star Ship" then makes a lot more sense.

Plus it has some nice resonance with the Romulan Star Empire.
 
shXxZmU.jpg
 
United Star Federation. Then you could still call it "the Federation" colloquially, but the canon "United Star Ship" then makes a lot more sense.

Plus it has some nice resonance with the Romulan Star Empire.

Life seldom makes sense. Why should Star Trek?
 
I think a novel briefly showed a universe where FSS was used.

The FSS Enterprise-E was one of several alternate versions of the Enterprise (with various prefixes (FSS, USV, US, ISS, ESS), plus a USS Sovereign, a USS Stargazer-A and an IKS Qu' (previously a USS/UES/ESS Enterprise).
 
The JJ-verse is noncanonical.
TF5QJ0q.gif


These are all of the registry number prefix types I've collected over the years. They are Legion, and some are a little... silly:
Code:
   NCC ------- Naval Construction Contract
   NCC-FXXXX - Naval Construction Contract/Freighter-Tender
   NCC-SXXXX - Naval Construction Contract/Support Vessel
   NCC-GXXXX - Naval Construction Contract/General Use
   NX -------- Naval Experiment
   NCO ------- Naval Construction Order (For Alternate-Federation Vessels)
   NDT ------- Naval Detached Transport
   NSP ------- Naval Science Program
   NSX ------- Naval SpecialOps Experiment
   SNC ------- Shi'ar Naval Contract
   Q --------- Intelligence "Q-Ship"
   C --------- Contract # (For pre-Federation Vessels)
   DT -------- Designated Tactical Vessel
   FCC ------- Fleet Command Crusier
   FF -------- Frigate Flagship/Fast Frigate
   FR -------- Freighter (For pre-Federation Vessels)
   L --------- Luxury/Civilian
   G --------- General Use
   SFDD ------ Starfleet Drydock
   TP -------- Travel Pod Registry
   NAR ------- Naval Auxiliary Resource/Research
   NAK ------- Naval Auxiliary Resource - Merchant Marine/Logistics
   NFT ------- Non-Federation Transport
   NGL ------- Non-Starfleet General-Purpose Liner

As for USS - yes, both United Space Ship and United Star Ship are canon, but recall that Merikus, (in "Bread and Circuses") specified a significant difference between spaceships and starships, with the latter (commanded by Kirk) being far more powerful than the former (commanded by him).

Due to the similarity of their names, the two really are interchangeable in this particular context.
 
Last edited:
TF5QJ0q.gif


These are all of the registry number prefix types I've collected over the years. They are Legion, and some are a little... silly:
Code:
   NCC ------- Naval Construction Contract
   NCC-FXXXX - Naval Construction Contract/Freighter-Tender
   NCC-SXXXX - Naval Construction Contract/Support Vessel
   NCC-GXXXX - Naval Construction Contract/General Use
   NX -------- Naval Experiment
   NCO ------- Naval Construction Order (For Alternate-Federation Vessels)
   NDT ------- Naval Detached Transport
   NSP ------- Naval Science Program
   NSX ------- Naval SpecialOps Experiment
   SNC ------- Shi'ar Naval Contract
   Q --------- Intelligence "Q-Ship"
   C --------- Contract # (For pre-Federation Vessels)
   DT -------- Designated Tactical Vessel
   FCC ------- Fleet Command Crusier
   FF -------- Frigate Flagship/Fast Frigate
   FR -------- Freighter (For pre-Federation Vessels)
   L --------- Luxury/Civilian
   G --------- General Use
   SFDD ------ Starfleet Drydock
   TP -------- Travel Pod Registry
   NAR ------- Naval Auxiliary Resource/Research
   NAK ------- Naval Auxiliary Resource - Merchant Marine/Logistics
   NFT ------- Non-Federation Transport
   NGL ------- Non-Starfleet General-Purpose Liner

As for USS - yes, both United Space Ship and United Star Ship are canon, but recall that Merikus, (in "Bread and Circuses") specified a significant difference between spaceships and starships, with the latter (commanded by Kirk) being far more powerful than the former (commanded by him).

Due to the similarity of their names, the two really are interchangeable in this particular context.

Yeah, a lot of them are similar to what I thought. Although I think I have NAR as 'Naval Auxiliary Reserve' potentially?
Didn't think of NSP 'Science Program', so yes, that seems fairly elegant.
There's a variety of freighter prefixes, plus BDT for the S.S Santa Maria, for example
And I've invented a whole new one, inspired by Starfleet Battles - which is NCP, for a patrol/perimetre ship, for a number of designs with awkward registry overlaps (like potentially, the Okinawa, Akula, Akyazi or Jester-classes, or the Orca-class corvette, and so forth)

The alternative being that some registries are just constantly reused, that is (such as NCC-100-300, 500-800, and 1000-1100, and so on)

Non Federation Transport is also pretty intuitive... but then why bother registering it, in the Federation, if so (hmmm)...?
 
Yeah, a lot of them are similar to what I thought. Although I think I have NAR as 'Naval Auxiliary Reserve' potentially?
Didn't think of NSP 'Science Program', so yes, that seems fairly elegant.
There's a variety of freighter prefixes, plus BDT for the S.S Santa Maria, for example
And I've invented a whole new one, inspired by Starfleet Battles - which is NCP, for a patrol/perimetre ship, for a number of designs with awkward registry overlaps (like potentially, the Okinawa, Akula, Akyazi or Jester-classes, or the Orca-class corvette, and so forth)

The alternative being that some registries are just constantly reused, that is (such as NCC-100-300, 500-800, and 1000-1100, and so on)

Non Federation Transport is also pretty intuitive... but then why bother registering it, in the Federation, if so (hmmm)...?
Cool! Thank you for that - there are a few new ones there that I can add to my collection! And, yes, Reserve does make sense there as well. There's nothing official about literally any of it, so it's as good a guess as any. :)

As for the non-Fed transport, I always likened it to a ship that is under Starfleet contract to transport cargo through Federation space, and therefore requiring a Federation registry for tracking purposes (in an often-failed attempt to tamp down on contraband smuggling), but from a non-aligned warp-capable world.

They would also potentially have contracts with the other major powers in the quadrant, requiring additional registration. Still subject to the laws of the space in which they operate.

Dukhat brought up "NCV" in another thread for the USS Relativity NCV-474439-G from the VOY episode of the same name. Trying to noodle out what the "V" stands for,,,
 
Last edited:
Dukhat brought up "NCV" in another thread for the USS Relativity NCV-474439-G from the VOY episode of the same name. Trying to noodle out what the "V" stands for,,,
Vessel? Vehicle?

Maybe in that time, the "NCC" designation for Federation starships was just briefly retired. Some things--like the use of primary colors for Starfleet uniforms--go out of fashion for awhile before being brought back.
 
Vessel? Vehicle?

Maybe in that time, the "NCC" designation for Federation starships was just briefly retired. Some things--like the use of primary colors for Starfleet uniforms--go out of fashion for awhile before being brought back.

I generally assume that the registry letters aren't specifically acronyms, but if you needed an acronym, maybe "Naval Cross-temporal Vessel"? Then it would only be for the timeships, and regular ships would still be NCC. By the timeframe of Discovery seasons 3 & 4, time travel is outlawed, so you wouldn't see those types of registries anymore.
 
Should have gone with "United Systems" instead of United Federation of Planets. The we could have had United Systems Starfleet.
"United Systems" sounds like a Silicon Valley tech company.

As for USS - yes, both United Space Ship and United Star Ship are canon, but recall that Merikus, (in "Bread and Circuses") specified a significant difference between spaceships and starships, with the latter (commanded by Kirk) being far more powerful than the former (commanded by him).
From the episode:
MERIK: He commands not just a spaceship, Proconsul, but a starship. A very special vessel and crew. I tried for such a command.

I think it's clear that a starship is a specific type of spaceship. After all, any vehicle that travels in space is a spaceship, right?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top