Greetings:
I am searching for schematics about the UFS Vengeance (UFS hereunder explained).
Specifically the saucer section and body section/drive section.
If anyone could help me, I would be quite grateful.
As to USS vs UFS: I very much dislike the USS prefix, as this is "too American".
Do not get me wrong here, I have absolutely no issues with America(ns), it is just too Earthly a prefix for the United Federation of Panets!
What would the second S stand for?
Nothing logical, and, excuse me the next line, too human dominant because it being so very American.
NCC was good, UFS (United Federation StarShip) or UFPS (United Federation (of) Planets Starship) would be even better, more respecting to the other species.
But, this is a personal feeling and thought line.
Feel free to simply ignore this, or to comment it.
Up to you....
United StarShip - or United SpaceShip - were said during TOS. The "USS" being American is more perceived inference than fact. And, why not, do you know what "USSR" stands for? "USS" seems closer to that than "US".
UFP has numerous types of craft. USS = United SpaceShip (or StarShip). They probably have boats that are United Speed Boat, though that might confuse certain people with Universal Serial Bus... ditto for the public transit service, United Speedy Busing... but nobody's yet mentioned "United Shipping Aeroplane", though at least teleportation technology takes care of that... I think this is a tad silly, and "USS" was never an acronym given to pump up America or the Soviet Union or the Unimpressed Salamander Society.
And to compare another series, the number of Americans demanding the police box in "Doctor Who" be turned into the style of phone booth Bill & Ted and Superman used because they can't stand things that look British is a whopping 0. Or the portapotty used in numerous spoof cartoons...
If the canon title is "USS Vengeance", may as well stick with that even though the movies arguably retconned the franchise's entire history just to cash in on nostalgic catchphrases and tropes - we should be more offended that Kirk never banged a green woman in TOS or that Kelvinville took a bunch of random TOS images and cobbled up the most superficial, generic combination. And intellectually void, even TOS had Kirk explaining what love was to oppressed people for crying out loud.
Of course, we could make a new show where they have their own terminology but apply a Trek-like feel to make sure nobody feels remotely taken aback due to an imaginary term that was unable to monopolize its letters to prevent misunderstanding, nor created with any malintent.
They all have, of course, their problems.
There's no such thing as a perfect society.
However, the aliens are quite aware of our turbulent past, and USS or HMS are both warlike abbreviations (whetehr you like it or not) that in that era, we would preferably not refer to, inadvertently or not?
And UF(P)S would make so more sense. :P
NCC/UFP are not warlike in of themselves. Star Trek series have frequently stated they are diplomatic and exploratory and use combat for self-defense. Never mind the key word, "United", since Star Trek's premise suggests/pretends humanity in the future all somehow got together and unified (don't ask how, but just presume they sang folks songs and smoked illicit substances, since this show came about during the ill-fated hippie era that the rest of the world didn't toe the line on to begin with.) The show overtly states, way too often, it is not warlike (unlike Klingons and Romulans and the Dominion), so why attempt an apocryphal retcon? I don't disagree with HMS, but only real people in the UK are able to change their nomenclature. Whether you like it or not, the franchise itself still preemptively discounts the perceived inference and attempted retcon.