• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

USS Legacy

calamity_si

Commander
Red Shirt
Background info:

The Legacy project, which began in the early 2370's, arose from Starfleet's need to expand on the capabilities of the Galaxy class explorer. Whilst the project was put on hold in favour of warship production during the Dominion War, it was reinstated upon the war's end in 2375. Whilst the Galaxy class was at the height of it's production run, many considered the design to have several inherent weaknesses that could only be fully addressed with a new class of ship. The Legacy would aim to improve upon the apparently high attrition rate of the Galaxy class and other vessels on deep space missions.

It had been noticed that the Galaxy class had a comparatively fragile space frame for a vessel of it's size. In fact, once it's shields were negated, vessels of this class would often have a matter of minutes before their warp cores went critical. Two famous examples of such calamities were the fates of the USS Odyssey and the Enterprise-D. As such, the Legacy class focused on durability above all else. As the ship was primarily an explorer and not a warship (like the Sovereign class) it's weapons would be limited to type XI phasers and photon torpedoes. As ablative armour was too costly and complicated to cover the entire vessel with, a new technique in manufacturing hull plating was employed that incorporated layers of carbon-neutronium alloy. These were intended to increase the ship's survivability rate even in the event of total shield failure.

Durability was also a key element in the ships overall design geometry. The main components of saucer and secondary hull were brought closer together and the pylons connecting the warp nacelles were made thicker and actually intersected the nacelles themselves, providing the ship with it's unique 'winged' profile and a useful platform for extra phaser emplacements.
Whilst this feature slightly decreased the overall stability of the warp field (by partially covering the nacelle field grilles), it also offered an increased degree of protection from enemy fire.

Another notable design feature was the removal of the ship's ability to separate it's saucer from its engineering section. For the Galaxy class, this was envisaged as a means of maintaining the majority of non-combatants safe in the saucer section, while using the stardrive section to enter hostile situations. However, its utility was vastly outweighed by keeping the ship ‘whole,’ as demonstrated by the lack of separation in the majority of risky or dangerous situations encounted by the Galaxy classes. Essentially, instead of having two ships that could operate independently, the ship actually created a capable, but weakened stardrive section (that lacked redundancy, such as impulse drive or additional transporter rooms) while simultaneously providing a huge liability in the need to defend the saucer. Overall, the removal of this feature gave the Legacy a much sturdier design which meant that it's structural integrity field required half as much energy as its Galaxy class counterpart.

With these modifications, Starfleeet hopes to create a starship that would be able to endure long range missions without the need of regular maintainence from a starbase. In fact, one of the primary missions of the Legacy would be to reinstate exploration of the furthest reaches of the Gamma quadrant, beyond the borders of the Dominion.

attachment.php

attachment.php

attachment.php

attachment.php

attachment.php
 
Nice ship design.

What are those, 4k images? only about half the image could be displayed at a time on my 1080p monitor.

Lots of scrolling.
 
A single large shuttle deck, or are there smaller ones that I didn't see?

What did you see as her compliment, similar to the Galaxy's one thousand?
 
I'm not sure what the overall size, internal volume, and standard/maximum compliment of the Legacy is supposed to be, but if she's supposed to be a one-piece affair, presumably on a vessel with a crew of at least 500 to 1,000, I would expect more shuttle hangars. where the aft wings flatten out behind the secondary hull, there are ample places there to locate shuttle bays both on the topside and the underside of the wing.

If the forward hull can't separate from the stardrive hull, I fail to see why a relatively thin neck is necessary, even if it is so short. The two hulls could join directly and maybe blend together a little better, a la Voyager.

Also: I think the warp winglets need more substantial phasers.

Really neat design. Really like the 3D artwork.
 
I liked the description until Neutronium got thrown out there. The most recent description of Neutronium is of a substance that current(as of the late 2260s) technology cannot manipulate. There is no TNG era description of it. It is described as "the hardest substance known", and as such, is not something that can be easily incorporated into starship design. The density of Neutronium would be prohibitive as far as energy consumption to make it move, anyway.

As far as the DDM, I think it was a piece of stellar flotsam that was used unaltered, personally. That a white dwarf extruded such a large form was probably unprecedented to the DDM's makers.
 
I like the design! But I'd would have changed up the nacelle a bit so the "wing" isn't going right through the grill.
 
Thanks guys. I know what you mean about the engines being intersected by the struts. Believe me, I've played around with the arrangement loads of times. I've tried raising the nacelles, lowering them, moving them further forward or back. Believe me, this is the best overall arrangement, that allows the nacelles to be fully visable from all angles (for example, moving them further forward would obsure the bussard collectors from a dorsal point of view - not a technical calamity, loads of ships do have that, but I felt that it ruined the overall profile as seen from above).

The best I can do is address the issue of the struts intersecting through the glass area or warp nacelle grille, if you prefer. The newer 'Mk II' nacelle has the grille more moulded around the strut. If you look closely at the port side elevation of this Haynes style set of orthos I've done, you can see what I mean. I'm currently waiting for another render to finish that'll better illustrate this modification.

u_s_s__legacy_spec_sheet___haynes_manual_style__by_calamitysi-d9dsuyz.jpg
 
And, the large images make for nice big wallpapers....if you like. Or just zoom out on your screen? (ctrl + roll down on your mouse or the minus button)
 
This is a really cool design, though I'll admit I prefer the TNG TM's original round saucer design over the longer Intrepid style one. But it's a pretty small nitpick. :D
 
One thought occurred to me when I looked at those outer wingtips:

If that section of the vessel is habitable while in flight, it could offer significant opportunities for (1: outer docking ports, allowing Legacy to physically dock with other starships and space stations, and (2: special equipment and maybe even a laboratory could be located there, where dangerous experiments could be conducted inside the ship but isolated from the main hulls. (Ben Finney's ion pod comes to mind.)
 
I like everything but the struts intersecting the radiators like that--that is, if we accept the convention that each engine has two coils. Otherwise they would need to be in direct visual contact with each other--raised or lowered so the secondary hull isn't separating their views of each other.

As for image size, I love large images, too, but I'll be damned if I'm zooming my view in my browser for one thread. Sorry. How about posting smaller thumbnails (640-800px range) and linking those to the gigantic images? To be perfectly honest with you, most people find such large images on sites to be annoying.

Your thread, so it's up to you. Just a friendly note.
 
^ In Firefox at least, if you right-click > View Image, it will automatically scale the image to fit in the browser window, without having to zoom.

And I like the slight improvement to the nacelle! :techman:
 
I feel compelled to reiterate that, based on the description of it from "The Doomsday Machine", neutronium is prohibitively dense and heavy. To make it an effective part of any hull plating, it must be manipulated into sheets as thin as filo dough, a process ST has never stated is possible. Once again, Spock said it was the hardest substance known, and was extruded from the core of a white dwarf star. A piece of it the size of a sewing needle would weigh hundreds of pounds. Most of the power generated by the DDM was undoubtedly just for motive force, to be able to fly around and find more 'food'.
 
I feel compelled to reiterate that, based on the description of it from "The Doomsday Machine", neutronium is prohibitively dense and heavy. To make it an effective part of any hull plating, it must be manipulated into sheets as thin as filo dough, a process ST has never stated is possible. Once again, Spock said it was the hardest substance known, and was extruded from the core of a white dwarf star. A piece of it the size of a sewing needle would weigh hundreds of pounds. Most of the power generated by the DDM was undoubtedly just for motive force, to be able to fly around and find more 'food'.

Well, you certainly raise a very good point. However, as this vessel cannot, in any way, be considered as 'cannon', I believe that this affords me a certain degree of leeway in terms of what is and isn't technology feasible. In the strictest cannon terms, Slipstream technology was never actually perfected, yet in many of the latest novels set in the prime universe, it is fast becoming the standard from of FTL travel. By the same token, Star Trek Online offers Neutronium hull armour as an engineering slot. However, if you see my latest notes on the orthos, I have 'toned down' the level of Neutronium present in the hull. I instead of being placed in layers throughout the entire hull, I have limited it's placement to specific key areas that may be considered as vulnerable, such as the neck and deflector dish. This was done in direct response to your comment, as an acknowledgement that the alloy in question is particularly rare and difficult to work with. Another point is that if the whole ship was covered in Neutronium, it would actually make repairs more difficult as the alloy would have to be cut or removed first.
 
That makes much more sense to me. I appreciate the fact that you've taken my comments into consideration, and I thank you.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top