• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Updated 2010 Schedule

Kopernikus

Commander
Red Shirt
Trekmovie posted the Updated Schedule for 2010:

http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/28/updated-2010-schedule-of-star-trek-books/

Star Trek Inception (January)
[TOS era]
by S.D. Perry & Britta Dennison

Star Trek New Frontier: Treason (February) [mass market reprint of 2009 TPB]
[New Frontier]
by Peter David

Star Trek: Seven Deadly Sins (February) [TPB]
[various eras]
Editor: Margaret Clark

Star Trek Online: The Needs of the Many
(March)[Star Trek Online era]
by Michael A. Martin

Star Trek: The Unspoken Truth (March)
[TOS movie era]
by Margaret Wander Bonanno

Star Trek The Children of Kings (April)
[TOS "The Cage" era]
by David Stern

Star Trek SCE: Out of the Cocoon (June) [TPB]
[Starfleet Corps of Engineers]
Editor: Keith R. A. DeCandido

Star Trek SCE: What’s Past (July) [TPB]
[Starfleet Corps of Engineers]
Editor: Keith R. A. DeCandido

Star Trek (August) [mass market reprint of 2009 HC & TPB]
[2009 Star Trek movie era]
by Alan Dean Foster

Star Trek The Next Generation: Nightshade (September) [reprint of 1992 paperback]
[TNG era]
by Laurell K. Hamilton

Star Trek: Typhon Pact #1: Seize the Fire (October)
[Titan]
by Michael A. Martin

Star Trek: Typhon Pact #2: Zero Sum Game (October)
[Aventine]
by David Mack

Star Trek: Myriad Universes: Shattered Light (November) [TPB]
[various eras]

Star Trek: Typhon Pact #3: The Rough Beasts of Empire (December)
[Deep Space Nine]
by Michael A. Martin



We already had heard about most of the changes, the only thing that leaves me puzzled is that reprint of "Nightshade". What's so special about this one, that it had to be reprinted after 18 years?


 
That is an incredibly random reprint. How bizarre - the only thing I can think of is tying it into Hamilton's Anita Blake stuff, but unless that's suddenly got a higher profile, I can't imagine why...
 
Not really liking the reprinting books...I will be picking up the trade paperback version of the Star Trek novelization though which I passed on buying because of it's size. I am getting Inception. Star Trek Online The Needs of the Many, and the Typhon Pact novels.
 
I agree that the reprint of Nightshade seems rather random and bizarre, or is something new by Hamilton scheduled for the same timeframe and S&S is trying to tie in to that? :vulcan:
 
Y'know, folks, you need to step outside of your Trekkie mindset every once in a while. Having the name Laurell K. Hamilton on the cover of a book will sell more copies for Pocket than the works of DeCandido, Mack, Ward and Dilmore combined. Depending on how they promote and market it, this could be a brilliant decision; with the right cover art and placement, they could end up compelling a not-insignificant number of Anita Blake fans to buy a book they otherwise would have walked right past at the local B&N or WalMart.
 
Y'know, folks, you need to step outside of your Trekkie mindset every once in a while. Having the name Laurell K. Hamilton on the cover of a book will sell more copies for Pocket than the works of DeCandido, Mack, Ward and Dilmore combined. Depending on how they promote and market it, this could be a brilliant decision; with the right cover art and placement, they could end up compelling a not-insignificant number of Anita Blake fans to buy a book they otherwise would have walked right past at the local B&N or WalMart.
Exactly. :)

I wonder if they might go for a non-Trek-ish cover, or even have Hamilton's name larger than Star Trek: The Next Generation. Wizards has done the same for her early Ravenloft novel.

I do think that Hamilton's legions of fans, expecting blood and graphic sex, are going to be disappointed in Nightshade, howsomever...

I'm also assuming a couple of misprints in what's above.

Zero Sum Game should probably be November, not October. And Rough Beasts of Empire shouldn't be Mike Martin's third novel of the year. :)
 
Hmm, looks like my expectations about The Needs of the Many were wrong. It is about filling in the intervening years between NEM and ST Online. It'll probably be based heavily on the "Path to 2409" stuff (or vice-versa?).
 
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that whoever decided to drop the nuTOS books wanted to clear the backlog of books that have been on the backburner for some time. We're getting two Corps of Engineers trades (leaving only one more trade to go, which will likely be next year) and the Myriad Universes anthology.

I'll be getting everything on that list except the NF and ST movie reprints. I don't think I have Nightshade in my collection so I'll be picking that up too.

To paraphrase Worf: "This is a good year to read."
 
^The MyrU anthology was already on the schedule, wasn't it? I don't see how its inclusion has anything to do with this change.

And if you mean to imply that the desire to clear up the backlog was a factor in the decision to drop the Abrams books, I'm certain that's not even remotely true. As has been stressed multiple times, there's no way that decision came from anyone at Pocket Books, and the people elsewhere who did make the decision would have no interest in Pocket's backlog. No, it's the other way around. When Pocket is faced with a gap in its schedule due to circumstances beyond its control, the backlog gives them something they can fall back on. Just like how comic-book companies keep fill-in issues ready in case the regular issue is delayed. You want to have things accumulating on the back burner so that you have a fallback position if something goes wrong with your main schedule. No publisher would choose to toss aside new product for the specific purpose of burning through the backup material. That's like deliberately tearing out your main parachute so that you can use the reserve chute instead. It makes no sense.
 
That is an incredibly random reprint. How bizarre - the only thing I can think of is tying it into Hamilton's Anita Blake stuff, but unless that's suddenly got a higher profile, I can't imagine why...

She's a solid market seller with her vampire stuff - if they have to reprint anything from the 90s, hers is probably the best choice because she's now the biggest name - in terms of original novels - of the writers from that era.

Oddly enough, I had just last week been posting on another forum about how she had written a Trek book (as part of a discussion of "which of these authors have you read" and I'd mentioned I'd read her but only her Trek book - to which a number of her current fans expressed surprise that she'd done one...)
 
^The MyrU anthology was already on the schedule, wasn't it? I don't see how its inclusion has anything to do with this change.

And if you mean to imply that the desire to clear up the backlog was a factor in the decision to drop the Abrams books, I'm certain that's not even remotely true. As has been stressed multiple times, there's no way that decision came from anyone at Pocket Books, and the people elsewhere who did make the decision would have no interest in Pocket's backlog. No, it's the other way around. When Pocket is faced with a gap in its schedule due to circumstances beyond its control, the backlog gives them something they can fall back on. Just like how comic-book companies keep fill-in issues ready in case the regular issue is delayed. You want to have things accumulating on the back burner so that you have a fallback position if something goes wrong with your main schedule. No publisher would choose to toss aside new product for the specific purpose of burning through the backup material. That's like deliberately tearing out your main parachute so that you can use the reserve chute instead. It makes no sense.
Christopher, we still don't know where the decision came from, only that it didn't come from Bad Robot. I'm looking at the list in front of me and there's still a gap for May. The ST:O book should be shunted to April and Stern's book to May, unless ST:O has to come out in March in which case Margaret's book can be pushed into April's slot to make a full schedule. And no, the MyrU anthology was not on the schedule, having been backburnered continually.

I don't see any commercial sense in pulling the nuTOS books and where is Slings and Arrows, the last of the CoE trades, or the Crucible HC which could also fill in May if everything stays where it is?

There may be a reason that everything, or nearly everything, on the backburner has been pushed onto the schedule, since there are now 4 nuTOS books which can be used for a rainy day. At the very worst, Pocket are setting the tie-in line for a big fall, though it remains to be seen whether the other tie-in lines are similarly affected by scheduling SNAFUs. I hope and pray I'm wrong, but IMHO something seems to be going on behind the scenes that we're not going to like.
 
Hmm, I'm probably going to be getting all of these except for the LKH, Trek '09 and Treason reprints. Although I'm probably never going to play the game, I am curious to read the STO book, since I like Michael A. Martin, and I'm curious to see more of the games' backstory. I'm actually kind of happy that there are months where I won't be getting stuff, since it gives me time to catch up on my older-Trek and non-Trek reading.
 
Christopher, we still don't know where the decision came from, only that it didn't come from Bad Robot.

No, we know it didn't come from Roberto Orci, and by implication his fellow writer-producers of the film. There's more to the Bad Robot corporation than just those individuals.

And there's no way this comes from Pocket. As you yourself acknowledge, there's no commercial sense to that decision. Pocket is hurt by this financially, so there's no way they would've made this choice unilaterally. Besides, Pocket/S&S advertised these books in their catalog just a week before the decision was made. Doesn't that in itself make it clear that the decision came from outside of Pocket?


And no, the MyrU anthology was not on the schedule, having been backburnered continually.

It was indeed on the schedule, although its position on the schedule was changed. It was initially announced for November '09, then bumped to summer '10. Now it's scheduled for November '10. So far from being unscheduled and put in now to fill the summer gap, it's actually been bumped out of the summer and delayed until the winter. That's not a consequence of the Abramsverse delays. It's presumably a consequence of the prior editorial upheavals at Pocket.


...and where is Slings and Arrows, the last of the CoE trades, or the Crucible HC which could also fill in May if everything stays where it is?

Like I said, having a backlog serves a purpose, as a safety net for future schedule hiccups. Pocket probably doesn't want to exhaust its entire backlog all at once. Also, an omnibus reprint of a set of e-books does require a certain amount of time and effort to tweak the format, give the authors the chance to make additional corrections, get it typeset, and so forth. Given the short notice here (another reason why it's absurd to think Pocket would've made this decision voluntarily), two CoE trades might be the most they can manage in the time available. Simple reprints are probably a bit easier.

Besides, as stated, Laurell K. Hamilton is a huge name, and Alan Dean Foster's novelization sold very well too. These books were expected to be big sellers (despite the cockamamie hypotheses of a certain poster), and the folks in charge at Pocket/S&S may have figured that e-book reprints alone wouldn't have done enough to compensate for their removal from the schedule. Plugging in reprints from two of the best-selling names available makes good business sense, at least given the options available.

(Caveat: I'm not privy to the decision-making process, just making educated guesses.)


There may be a reason that everything, or nearly everything, on the backburner has been pushed onto the schedule, since there are now 4 nuTOS books which can be used for a rainy day.

That doesn't make sense. The backburnered books are what Pocket has set aside for a rainy day. The rainy day is the shelving of the Abrams books. There's no conceivable reason, to go back to my previous metaphor, why Pocket would tear out their main parachute so they could turn it into a reserve chute and then use their reserve chute as their main chute. You're overcomplicating this to a totally unnecessary degree. Pocket wanted to publish these books, other players higher on the totem pole required them to shelve them, and they were forced to fill the gap with their backup material. It's as simple as that.
 
, we still don't know where the decision came from, only that it didn't come from Bad Robot.

We don't know that at all - Bad Robot has employees and staff, you know, as well as the screenwriters on board. Just cos the screenwriter says "wasn't me" that doesn't mean it couldn't be the executive vice-director of department whatever...
 
^You don't suppose it could've been the actual Bad Robot, do you...? :borg: I mean, what does it do when it's not rolling around in that wheatfield?
 
Oddly enough, I had just last week been posting on another forum about how she had written a Trek book (as part of a discussion of "which of these authors have you read" and I'd mentioned I'd read her but only her Trek book - to which a number of her current fans expressed surprise that she'd done one...)
It's not surprising her fans aren't aware she wrote a TNG novel. She's essentially disowned the book.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top