Yeah, but that's the boring real world answer and hardly satisfying. As fans we can give a rat's patoot about it and come up with semi-plausible explanations.Or perhaps Nick Meyer just didn't give a rat's patoot about getting the technical details of the Star Trek universe correct...![]()
That would make sense, but in TOS we don't really see an executive officer. Spock is 2IC, yes - but do we ever see him doing actual XO duties? He's described as the science officer more than the executive officer. And whilst there is certainly a tradition of the 2IC and the XO being the same person that dates back to the late 17th Century Royal Navy, where the First Lieutenant's duties included what we'd now call the Executive Officer's duties, which is to say managing the crew in the same way the Chief Engineer manages the engineering department and the Surgeon manages sickbay.
I'm not sure what we're talking about as "XO duties". In the USN sense it's managing the day-to-day functioning and routine of the whole ship, which means coordinating across all departments, which means the XO has to be above all department heads. Riker was shown doing "crew evaluations" and such a few times, but his everyday duties are almost as unknown as Spock's. Because no show is going to spend time showing an individual going about their daily work, it's too un-dramatic.
Also, other people have provided plenty of examples of Spock doing just as much as Riker did, so clearly this is a memory failure on my part.But they are two different jobs - and as someone who likes to see daylight between Star Fleet and a 20th Century navy, as someone who prefers to think of Star Fleet as more para-military than pure military, the notion that the 2IC of a TOS-era cruiser might not be the XO really appeals to me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.