• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TVH - Clothing question

Actually it's a very smart idea, that aliens would have different color sensitivity. After all, there are species right here on Earth whose range of color perception differs from ours (for instance, insects can see ultraviolet), and many aliens would've evolved under stars with different spectra than our own. It's just that it's a hard idea to reconcile with the color and lighting choices of the filmmakers who created the Klingon bridges in the movies.

That's why the Klingons evolved purple blood -- if it were red, they could hurt themselves badly and not know it.

;)
 
OTOH, there'd be little point in purchasing Earth attire from Vulcan unless the original Earth gear was damaged or lost or otherwise unsuitable. Which Chekov's original clothing may have been.

Oh, it was unsuitable alright.
 
There are a lot of things in the movie that don't seem to fit the three-month timeframe. They're wearing the same clothes, they haven't been extradited yet, Saavik hasn't talked to Kirk about David yet, and the Klingon ambassador waited this long to speak to the Federation Council about Genesis. But the only reference to a three-month exile is in Kirk's log-entry voiceover near the start of the film. It makes me wonder if that was an afterthought added late in the process, without its ramifications really being taken into consideration. It is in the revised shooting script, though, so it wouldn't have been something they added in postproduction.

I wonder though, 3 months by Earth or Vulcan reckoning?
 
There isn't much precedent to Kirk ever using local units, though.

And if Vulcan doesn't have a moon, the Vulcan month probably isn't easily observable (although that's not to say that an Earth month would somehow be obvious to the layman) and wouldn't affect Kirk's life much. Unless Vulcans organize their public holidays around it or something. Or unless Vulcan months manifest as seismic upheavals as Vulcan, the moon, passes close to the planet it circles...

A long exile is a dramatically supportable choice in that it gives Spock more time to recover from having his hard drive formatted. Also, it helps out with the usual serialized fiction problem of frequent and patterned occurrences of adventures: even though it still is a big coincidence that the Whale Probe Crisis strikes just as Kirk is in a position to do something about it, then at least it doesn't happen at the very moment Kirk gets over the Genesis Crisis.

The Genesis Crisis in ST2 and ST3 was a nice package where new twists and turns inevitably followed the initial trigger, the arrival of the Reliant at Ceti Alpha. But the timing of this arrival would be the "adventure of the week" random event that the writers would do well to separate from the next "adventure of the week" random event, the arrival of the Whale Probe, by a suitably long yet suitably random time interval...

Timo Saloniemi
 
And if Vulcan doesn't have a moon, the Vulcan month probably isn't easily observable (although that's not to say that an Earth month would somehow be obvious to the layman) and wouldn't affect Kirk's life much.
A month was originally a cycle of the moon (as it still is on the Hebrew calendar). If Vulcan doesn’t have a moon, the Vulcan calendar wouldn’t have months at all — unless they decided to divide their solar year arbitrarily into “months” after making contact with civilizations on other planets.

“Hey, that planet has a moon, and the inhabitants use its orbit to measure time. We don’t have a moon, but we could do the same thing because it‘s cool!”
 
I'm sure the concept of a "month" of sorts doesn't require a moon. Just as we invented a decimal system someone else might decide a year of days as an awkward size to deal with and might divide it into smaller units of X days.
 
An 8 month year would be logical, based around the 4 seasons, 2 months per season, dividing each one in half.
 
...Assuming that there are four seasons. The number of seasons isn't necessarily four, or even an even number; in monsoon regions, three is the norm, and the higher latitudes tend to have more than four distinct seasons as far as flora, fauna and weather are concerned.

We know for a fact that Vulcan has months: Spock specifies "the month of Tasmeen" in TAS "Yesteryear". What we don't know is the length and definition of a Vulcan month - whether it's shorter or longer than a Vulcan year.

Theoretically, Spock might also have been referring to Earth months for the lack of comparable Vulcan units, and essentially saying "February, the month when tasmeen is flowering on Vulcan highlands", or "August, the month when Tasmeen is celebrated on Vulcan", or "October, the month we get the awful tasmeens that can level entire towns".

Timo Saloniemi
 
That jibes rather well with "Amok Time" and the concept of the Federation government trembling at the thought of T'Pau casting an evil look at them. Vulcan is probably quite a bit more equal than others in the UFP internal hierarchy. When Starfleet deals with Vulcan, it doesn't place a call - it sends an "expedition", as referred to in "Court Martial"... And Vulcan might choose not to allow such an expedition to proceed, or to return. It probably wouldn't be difficult for the intellectual puppets of the Federation to yank on their wires and bring the puppeteer tumbling down.

Agreed. A federation implies a collection of autonomous states who have agreed, in principle, to a federal entity. However, legally and in practice one of the states might not always agree to a dictate from the federal government. Or, like you said, the federal government might not seek to enforce its dictates on a particular state for various reasons.

In this case, although the Federation Council sought Kirk and Co. (were they every actually indicted for a crime, or was it more akin to a grand jury or even just a hearing?), they were probably loath to have Vulcan's refusal made public if they specifically asked Vulcan to return our heroes.

Doug
 
Plus, it might have been a nice way to deflect the Klingon calls for extraditing the criminals. "We don't know where they are, not exactly, although there are some rumors about somebody having mentioned Vulcan in this connection. We have approached the local authorities, and are expecting a response any year now."

Timo Saloniemi
 
Well, Chekov's actually wearing a different outfit. They thought wearing leather in San Francisco would be less conspicuous than the pink outfit he had on is SFS.
I dunno. Somehow I feel no one would have blinked twice if Chekov wore a pink outfit in San Francisco.
Maybe Chekov wouldn't have minded wearing pink, but it's more likely that Walter Koenig preferred something a bit more... masculine. ;)

(besides, can't you just see the interrogation scene take a wildly divergent tack if the supposed "spy" were wearing a cute little pink outfit with a cute little collar?)

Most of the castaways on Gilligan's Island always wore the same outfit, with the exception of the Howells and Ginger.
This made perfect sense for the show, because after all, nobody was expecting to be gone longer than 3 hours. So why would anybody except eccentric millionaires and vain movie starlets pack anything more than they'd need for an average afternoon of shopping/sightseeing?

And this may have happened. But under our civil system, prisoners can have their clothing returned (or replaced with nicer) for trial proceedings. Something similar could have happened with Kirk and McCoy.
Except that they were still wearing the same uniforms after their trial, and after their sentencing to Rura Penthe, a hellhole prison planet that few prisoners are expected to survive. That's the whole point -- the patch Spock put on Kirk's jacket allowed the crew to track him down in prison and rescue him. So they went through arrest, trial, sentencing, and imprisonment without ever changing their clothes.
I think I have it solved. They have sonic showers in the 23rd century. So whenever our heroes felt a bit grubby or their clothes started smelling a bit ripe, they just stepped into a sonic shower, clothes and all... and BEEP! in a few seconds, they'd have been perfectly clean.

(very handy appliances; wish I had one of those!)
 
This made perfect sense for the show, because after all, nobody was expecting to be gone longer than 3 hours. So why would anybody except eccentric millionaires and vain movie starlets pack anything more than they'd need for an average afternoon of shopping/sightseeing?

Actually, Ginger started out limited to just the dress she was originally wearing and then another dress made from an SS Minnow blanket or tarp or something. But there was an episode or two where crates of clothing washed up on the island, so her wardrobe became more diverse.


I think I have it solved. They have sonic showers in the 23rd century. So whenever our heroes felt a bit grubby or their clothes started smelling a bit ripe, they just stepped into a sonic shower, clothes and all... and BEEP! in a few seconds, they'd have been perfectly clean.

Klingons aren't known for their love of bathing. Sure, if you're on Earth or a Starfleet vessel, you can hop into a sonic shower anytime you like, but if you're a prisoner of war in the bowels of the Klingon penal system? I wouldn't bet on it.

And we have canonical proof that sonic showering is done without clothes on -- see the end of Voyager: "Juggernaut." And that makes sense, because sonic showers aren't magic. If you did it with your clothes on, the surface of your clothes would be cleaned, but what about underneath?
 
I think the "rudder" line was just a semantical "callback"/term for a maneuver the thrusters do to make the ship move/turn not that the ship has an actual rudder somewhere.
Well, "right standard rudder" is a valid command today for vessels that don't have rudders at all, but rely on Azipods or other alternate steering methods. Anachronisms aren't really objectionable if used in the military context; most real world military terminology consists of ancient words that have lost their original meaning long ago, of needless jargon, or even of deliberate misnomers, after all.

A starship would need to have separate commands for the act of turning clockwise and for the act of sliding to starboard without turning. "Starboard thrusters" couldn't cover both, but it could plausibly refer to the slide without turning; "Right rudder" could the cover the turn. Of course, such commands would only be needed in close range, low relative speed maneuvering; in wide-ranging combat moves, course settings would be the way to go, with things like ship orientation left for the helmsperson to choose.

Why didn't Starfleet send out a ship to pick-up Kirk and co. and tow the BoP?
That jibes rather well with "Amok Time" and the concept of the Federation government trembling at the thought of T'Pau casting an evil look at them. Vulcan is probably quite a bit more equal than others in the UFP internal hierarchy. When Starfleet deals with Vulcan, it doesn't place a call - it sends an "expedition", as referred to in "Court Martial"... And Vulcan might choose not to allow such an expedition to proceed, or to return. It probably wouldn't be difficult for the intellectual puppets of the Federation to yank on their wires and bring the puppeteer tumbling down.

And we never saw the interior of a Klingon ship in TOS.
We did see one in TAS, though, and it was all greens and blues (with a bit of pink for variety, but no marked red elements). A pretty nice match for the interior used in ST3, to be sure - even if the ST3 design and colors were done mainly to get mileage out of maximally simplistic and cheap set elements.

Timo Saloniemi


With respect to the "rudder" line, I was just flipping through David Alexander's bio of GR. On page 542, he references a meeting with GR and N. Meyer about certain story points. "...Meyer had made a reference in the script to a very nineteenth century nautical thing, like, 'right standard rudder.' Gene was saying, 'Starships don't ahve rudders! We need to think of a more appropriate term.'"

Another point that I hadn't referenced before was the Nixon comment. Apparently, GR had an issue as well: "There were a few things that ultimately stayed in. Gene objected to the reference of Klingons (I assume he meant Vulcans) saying 'As the Americans would say, 'Only Nixon would go to China!' Gene thought that was the most ridculous thing he'd ever heard."
 
And we have canonical proof that sonic showering is done without clothes on -- see the end of Voyager: "Juggernaut." And that makes sense, because sonic showers aren't magic. If you did it with your clothes on, the surface of your clothes would be cleaned, but what about underneath?

In TNG's "The Naked Now" Riker seems somewhat surprised by the concept of someone "showering with their clothes on" after investigating the problems on the starfleet ship infected with the Psi MM intoxication/"virus." He finds this so remarkable and rare he actually seeks out through the computer where he has heard of this before and comes across the Enterprise's experience with the Psi MM condition.
 
This has always bugged me in TVH. When Saavik says:

SAAVIK: Sir. I have not had the opportunity to tell you about your son. David died most bravely. He saved Spock. He saved us all. I thought you should know.

When in the prior film we saw this exchange:

KIRK: What happened?
SAAVIK: He gave his life to save us.

:vulcan:
 
This has always bugged me in TVH. When Saavik says:

SAAVIK: Sir. I have not had the opportunity to tell you about your son. David died most bravely. He saved Spock. He saved us all. I thought you should know.

When in the prior film we saw this exchange:

KIRK: What happened?
SAAVIK: He gave his life to save us.

:vulcan:

Maybe Kirk and the crew were isolating themselves from her due to the fact of not wanting to damage her career any further? Hence that Jim never had that total explanation of how brave David truly was and Saavik finally had a chance to tell him.
As for the clothes it never bothered me one bit....Maybe Chekov had a change because he was the only one that wanted a new outfit??
Another example of no new outfits was:
SCOTTY: "Oh, I also changed the Klingon foodpacks! They were giving me a sour stomach."
KIRK: "Oh? Is that what that was?"
Maybe Jim was suggesting he had BO among with that?...:lol:
 
I never knew how to take Kirk's line ("Oh, is that what that was?").

It could mean, "Oh, is that what was giving you a sour stomach?"

Or, it could mean, "Oh, is your sour stomach what I've been smelling?"

I really didn't want to know the answer. :p
 
There's probably a deleted scene with the crew sitting around in their borrowed Vulcan gowns, when Kirk walks in and says "Gentlemen, put your pants back on and meet me at the Bounty!"
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top