• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Tricorders & Communicators

Thanks for that clarification, Rick. I figured that "separation of functions" mentality was what prevented the tricorder from ever being used as a communicator on-screen. In any case, it's good to know you designed them with multitasking in mind!

Oh, and that little bit about Danar using the unconscious crewman's finger to activate the combadge has always been one of my favorite subtle nods to the more advanced security features of the combadges. Glad that one slipped through.

Actually, truth be told, that one was suggested by Robert Woodhead of Animeigo, when he came to the studio for a visit. We poked it up to the producers in a tech memo.

Rick
www.spacemodelsystems.com
 
There are a couple of ways to look at the features of communicators.

One, is that Starfleet wanted its personnel "in the field" to have a simple, easy-to-use audio communications device that would be extremely easy to maintain or even build "in the field" ("Patterns of Force"). One thing we must remember: these sophisticated multifunction toys we call "smart phones" are radio frequency devices that rely on human civilization's telecommunications infrastructure to "place a call". Try using even the slickest smartphone where there is no cell phone service. Communicators are subspace radios, meant to exchange signals between a ship and planet/base, even when the ship is at warp or still out in deep space ("Mudd's Women", "11001001", "Silicon Avatar"), which means their biggest asset must be POWER.

There's no reason a tricorder shouldn't be able to function as a communications device, but you don't want an important scan to be interrupted by an incoming call, do you? :lol:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top