• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TrekUnited-Who did/didn't get there money back? Am I alone?

Re: TrekUnited-Who did/didn't get there money back? Am I al

TU stopped campaigning when it became absolutely clear their campaign had no chance of succeeding. They fed their followers some stuff about "being in negotiations" with Paramount and so forth, but absolutely no evidence whatsoever was presented to back up those claims.
 
Re: TrekUnited-Who did/didn't get there money back? Am I al

Much as I like Tom/FleetLord, my belief in Al Vinci died when someone on ST.com did a remarkable amount of research and revealed exactly zero evidence that he ever existed.

Were we doomed from day one? Yeah. Were our "ambassadors" obnoxious, loud, and, by and large, completely belligerent to exactly the people to whom we needed to be the most appealing? In short, was the Sinister Six exactly right about just about everything?

Yes, to all of the above.

That being said... the atmosphere at TU in those early months was utterly, totally exhilirating. I have to imagine it was a feeling akin to what Obamamaniacs feel when Barack speaks--there was something about the enterprise that resonated very deeply with me and a lot of other people, and I was excited. HRH, you have your history wrong: Paramount didn't make a clear statement about accepting money from the fans until weeks after TU started up. (I suspect they were waiting for the whole thing to self-destruct and so didn't want to legitimize it by acknowledging its existence until they had to.) For some time there, absent definitive Paramount comment and general reports of support from the actors, it felt like there was a chance, perhaps a one-in-a-million chance but a chance all the same, that we would somehow raise that money and that the studio would accept it, or our proposed House Resolution in support of Enterprise would get enough supporters to reach the floor (our only supporter in that project was, unfortunately, one Rep. Larry Craig), or something else would happen completely unexpectedly that would get the show renewed. That chance was probably never there at all, but that doesn't change the feeling we had at TU in those days, which was that we were fans and that, together, we could do anything.

As for the rest, Al Vinci only appeared in the final two weeks of the Fund the Future campaign and wouldn't be thoroughly debunked until after that campaign ended. Once that campaign was over, TU itself was effectively over. The Freston campaign and my marvelous "Waiting Journals" in which I did indeed describe Tim Brazeal in godlike terms and we as his mere sheep fighting our way out of the "Valley of Unknowledge" both came well after that, when the Sinister Six and its BBS counterparts had already definitively won the fights outside of TU. Good times. In short, while TU quickly fell in importance and reputability after the announcement of the end of the campaign, up until that point it was merely crazy, not outright ludicrous.

As probably the star member of the SS, I would of course expect you to disagree, HRH, but I'll continue to hold the opinion that, for the short time that it lasted, TU was something special.

I haven't heard that, Frontier, but I've long since stopped trying to figure out what was true on the TU Executive Staff. In retrospect, though, it wasn't Brazeal and the Execs that made TU special: it was the rank-and-file who took the idea and believed in it enough to give it life.
 
Re: TrekUnited-Who did/didn't get there money back? Am I al

Much as I like Tom/FleetLord, my belief in Al Vinci died when someone on ST.com did a remarkable amount of research and revealed exactly zero evidence that he ever existed.

Were we doomed from day one? Yeah. Were our "ambassadors" obnoxious, loud, and, by and large, completely belligerent to exactly the people to whom we needed to be the most appealing? In short, was the Sinister Six exactly right about just about everything?

Yes, to all of the above.

We were right indeed. I'm glad you finally see it that way. Your "ambassadors" were a disaster. Poor old "Vulcan3324" had the misfortune of being the official "liason" to StarTrek.COM.

That's a dangerous liason for sure.

That being said... the atmosphere at TU in those early months was utterly, totally exhilirating. I have to imagine it was a feeling akin to what Obamamaniacs feel when Barack speaks--there was something about the enterprise that resonated very deeply with me and a lot of other people, and I was excited.

It was a mass delusion though. That was the problem.

HRH, you have your history wrong: Paramount didn't make a clear statement about accepting money from the fans until weeks after TU started up. (I suspect they were waiting for the whole thing to self-destruct and so didn't want to legitimize it by acknowledging its existence until they had to.)

Paramount told Brazeal that no money would be accepted in March of 2005. Instead of announcing this fact to the TU faithful, Brazeal buried it in a web-chat. It seems odd that TU, a group who were more than happy to make "major announcements" at the drop of a hat, for some reason kept this pretty important information buried on a thread with a low-key remark by the TU owner.

For some time there, absent definitive Paramount comment and general reports of support from the actors, it felt like there was a chance, perhaps a one-in-a-million chance but a chance all the same, that we would somehow raise that money and that the studio would accept it, or our proposed House Resolution in support of Enterprise would get enough supporters to reach the floor (our only supporter in that project was, unfortunately, one Rep. Larry Craig), or something else would happen completely unexpectedly that would get the show renewed.

Larry Craig was a Senator, was he not?

I was under the impression it was Mark Foley who actually supported ENT and TU publically.

That chance was probably never there at all, but that doesn't change the feeling we had at TU in those days, which was that we were fans and that, together, we could do anything.

That's where the isolation became a problem.

As for the rest, Al Vinci only appeared in the final two weeks of the Fund the Future campaign and wouldn't be thoroughly debunked until after that campaign ended. Once that campaign was over, TU itself was effectively over. The Freston campaign and my marvelous "Waiting Journals" in which I did indeed describe Tim Brazeal in godlike terms and we as his mere sheep fighting our way out of the "Valley of Unknowledge" both came well after that, when the Sinister Six and its BBS counterparts had already definitively won the fights outside of TU.

When "Al Vinci" came along, there was hysteria on TU. Thread after thread passed based on this alleged person. I would say most of the active membership of TU were taken in by it.

Good times. In short, while TU quickly fell in importance and reputability after the announcement of the end of the campaign, up until that point it was merely crazy, not outright ludicrous.

I don't think TU was ever more than a simple message board with members who had delusions of their own importance. The clearest sign of that came when your leaders began dishing out "titles" for themselves and their cronies. The most absurd being your PR woman, who's posts were hilarious pieces of unintentional comedy.

As probably the star member of the SS, I would of course expect you to disagree, HRH, but I'll continue to hold the opinion that, for the short time that it lasted, TU was something special.

The S6 had no "star" members. No leaders, no organisation, no "Media Staff".

We were just Star Trek fans with opinions. That's all.
 
Re: TrekUnited-Who did/didn't get there money back? Am I al

HRHTheKING said:
We were right indeed. I'm glad you finally see it that way. Your "ambassadors" were a disaster. Poor old "Vulcan3324" had the misfortune of being the official "liason" to StarTrek.COM.

In fact, for a short time there, IIRC, there were -several- liaisons to StarTrek.com (it was labelled a "problem site") because of serious organizational problems, and then Tim's wife showed up and announced her opposition to any such position at all, then proceeded to make all sorts of inflammatory commentary that did no help to anyone.

Sigh. Yeah. In the words of the TF2 Heavy, "So! Much! Blood!"

It was a mass delusion though. That was the problem.

True. I suppose I'm saying that there can be some value in a mass delusion. Good things did come out of TU: I made some friends there, some of whom I still run into at random in other venues today. A few of us went on into fan productions of various sorts. And the volume of fanfic coming from people once attached to TU is truly enormous. We all shared a hope. It proved to be a false hope, and that was hard on everyone, but it still brought a lot of people together.

Paramount told Brazeal that no money would be accepted in March of 2005. Instead of announcing this fact to the TU faithful, Brazeal buried it in a web-chat. It seems odd that TU, a group who were more than happy to make "major announcements" at the drop of a hat, for some reason kept this pretty important information buried on a thread with a low-key remark by the TU owner.

Really? I don't remember this allegation--later shown to be true--showing up until Michael Hinman's articles of early April 2005, a couple of weeks before the announcement that we were done. You may be right; goodness knows the Exec Staff was secretive enough.

Larry Craig was a Senator, was he not?

I was under the impression it was Mark Foley who actually supported ENT and TU publically.

You're exactly correct. I got my sex-offending Congresspersons confused.

That chance was probably never there at all, but that doesn't change the feeling we had at TU in those days, which was that we were fans and that, together, we could do anything.

That's where the isolation became a problem.

Yep. Right alongside that feeling of empowerment was the companion feeling of fanaticism. We were not a healthy organization.

When "Al Vinci" came along, there was hysteria on TU. Thread after thread passed based on this alleged person. I would say most of the active membership of TU were taken in by it.

Oh, I was, too. At the time, there seemed like no good reason not to believe in Vinci--Tim was so vague with the details that it took several weeks for anyone to discover beyond any reasonable doubt that Al Vinci was a fiction. And by the time those two weeks were past, the campaign was over.

Speaking of frauds perpetrated by TU: I never mentioned this because Tim Brazeal personally wrote to me to ask me not to, but I did some WHOIS tracing while I was on my "Waiting Prophet" streak, and I discovered that the domain MannyCoto.com (which no longer exists) was actually owned by Trek United. Tim claimed that Coto didn't want to reveal his close links with TU yet, but, given how suspicious I have been of TU, it seems to me very likely that the Manny Coto user who frequently visited TU was in fact a pure fabrication.

There. Got that into the public after a few years.

I don't think TU was ever more than a simple message board with members who had delusions of their own importance. The clearest sign of that came when your leaders began dishing out "titles" for themselves and their cronies. The most absurd being your PR woman, who's posts were hilarious pieces of unintentional comedy.

Hey, you're talking to the Trek United Midwest Regional Activities Coordinator! :P

As I said above, it was, to some degree (and that degree is probably in the 99-100% range), a delusion that we would ever get Enterprise back. So I agree. But it is a fact that, though who knows whether we can trust the TU money counter, we have testimony from dozens of Trekkies who gave thousands of dollars in the faint hopes of saving their show. That's not a delusion; it's an affirmation of how much we love our show. To be around people who shared such passion for Star Trek for eight weeks or so was a gift and an experience I will never regret--despite everything.

The S6 had no "star" members. No leaders, no organisation, no "Media Staff".

We were just Star Trek fans with opinions. That's all.

When I think of the SS, the first name that comes into my head is HRHTheKing. You were strident, deeply sarcastic, and everywhere at once, so, in my mind, you were the most important member. That's all I meant by what I said.

(The second name that always pops into my head was that friend of yours... what's his name? Had the same sense of sarcasm, and now I can't think of his name.)
 
Re: TrekUnited-Who did/didn't get there money back? Am I al

In fact, for a short time there, IIRC, there were -several- liaisons to StarTrek.com (it was labelled a "problem site") because of serious organizational problems, and then Tim's wife showed up and announced her opposition to any such position at all, then proceeded to make all sorts of inflammatory commentary that did no help to anyone.

Sigh. Yeah. In the words of the TF2 Heavy, "So! Much! Blood!"

The blind worship of the Brazeals is probably the thing that disappointed me most about your group. I honestly didn't think Star Trek fans could be so sheep-like.

True. I suppose I'm saying that there can be some value in a mass delusion. Good things did come out of TU: I made some friends there, some of whom I still run into at random in other venues today. A few of us went on into fan productions of various sorts. And the volume of fanfic coming from people once attached to TU is truly enormous. We all shared a hope. It proved to be a false hope, and that was hard on everyone, but it still brought a lot of people together.

Pretty much from the start I said that TU would be put to better use as a simple message board with friends posting harmlessly. It was the "campaigning" elements of your group that worked against them.

As I said above, it was, to some degree (and that degree is probably in the 99-100% range), a delusion that we would ever get Enterprise back. So I agree. But it is a fact that, though who knows whether we can trust the TU money counter, we have testimony from dozens of Trekkies who gave thousands of dollars in the faint hopes of saving their show. That's not a delusion; it's an affirmation of how much we love our show. To be around people who shared such passion for Star Trek for eight weeks or so was a gift and an experience I will never regret--despite everything.

What your group should have done is simply write polite letters to Paramount (ONE per person). That would have sufficed. It probably wouldn't have brought back ENT because your side simply didn't have the numbers required to make an impact, but it would have prevented your group from moving from one futile "plan" to another. It also would have allowed your side to make your point that SOME Star Trek fans at least loved the show.
 
Re: TrekUnited-Who did/didn't get there money back? Am I al

iwantmytwodollars.jpg

I want my two dollars!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top