darkwing_duck1
Vice Admiral
Seconded, thirded, voted, motion carries...mods, can we get the hook now?
This site ended the debate for me.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/
^^^But, again selective reading of sources. All the sources have internal contradictions on both sides. It remains a meaningless exercise because neither side can take into account all the contradictory information, and so much is left to our imaginations (I mean, aftermarket books aside, was the power output of any Imperial device ever discussed on screen?).This site ended the debate for me.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/
BIG space station fire big laser. Planet go BOOM.
Is a detailed discussion of the power output involved really necessary? It was obviously enough.
^^^But, again selective reading of sources. All the sources have internal contradictions on both sides. It remains a meaningless exercise because neither side can take into account all the contradictory information, and so much is left to our imaginations (I mean, aftermarket books aside, was the power output of any Imperial device ever discussed on screen?).
BIG space station fire big laser. Planet go BOOM.
Is a detailed discussion of the power output involved really necessary? It was obviously enough.
Launch single torpedo size missile with tri-lithium based "sunkiller" bomb warhead at sun, whole solar system go BOOM!
Darn it...I'm getting sucked in AGAIN...
As long as things can remain civil, I'd prefer not to lock this thread. We see countless age-old questions get repeated on this board, because after awhile there's not much new to talk about. I tend to view the whole idea as apples and oranges anyway, which is why I think the poll should have an option for the B5 universe to win.![]()
![]()
They also like to use contortions of logic to try to deny or explain away pro-Trek facts and figures. The most infamous example is Trek weapons ranges. Dialogue in the ep says the range is "X". The Warsies at SD.net say "that's not what the footage shows", they must've read their instruments wrong!" That's their excuse ANY time dialogue makes Trek look better. That Starfleet professionals can't read their own instruments correctly.
They also like to use contortions of logic to try to deny or explain away pro-Trek facts and figures. The most infamous example is Trek weapons ranges. Dialogue in the ep says the range is "X". The Warsies at SD.net say "that's not what the footage shows", they must've read their instruments wrong!" That's their excuse ANY time dialogue makes Trek look better. That Starfleet professionals can't read their own instruments correctly.
But aren't we talking about the same Starfleet professionals who routinely fly perfectly good starships through radioactive death clouds simply because they seem not to have mastered the simple concepts of "up" and "down" in space? Maybe they can't read their own instruments.
Are there any articles where Lucas states the tech books aren't canon?
They also like to use contortions of logic to try to deny or explain away pro-Trek facts and figures. The most infamous example is Trek weapons ranges. Dialogue in the ep says the range is "X". The Warsies at SD.net say "that's not what the footage shows", they must've read their instruments wrong!" That's their excuse ANY time dialogue makes Trek look better. That Starfleet professionals can't read their own instruments correctly.
But aren't we talking about the same Starfleet professionals who routinely fly perfectly good starships through radioactive death clouds simply because they seem not to have mastered the simple concepts of "up" and "down" in space? Maybe they can't read their own instruments.
In case it had eluded you, "radioactive death clouds" ALSO exist in more than two dimensions. When you are at point A and need to be at point B as fast as possible and point b is on the other side of the RDC, you take a risk.
So, which one are you over there?
*Edit* here's a thread that's a good example of SDnet at it's "finest", esp read some of Darth Wrong...er Wong's posts: http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=114007&start=0
But aren't we talking about the same Starfleet professionals who routinely fly perfectly good starships through radioactive death clouds simply because they seem not to have mastered the simple concepts of "up" and "down" in space? Maybe they can't read their own instruments.
In case it had eluded you, "radioactive death clouds" ALSO exist in more than two dimensions. When you are at point A and need to be at point B as fast as possible and point b is on the other side of the RDC, you take a risk.
So, which one are you over there?
*Edit* here's a thread that's a good example of SDnet at it's "finest", esp read some of Darth Wrong...er Wong's posts: http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=114007&start=0
Looks like we're not waiting for the SD.net folk to arrive before we start becoming uncivil.
That thread definitely has a pro-Star Wars slant but if you go to a site with Star Destroyer in its url what do you expect? As someone said earlier both sides are just as guilty of selective interpretation to further their side of the argument.
They also like to use contortions of logic to try to deny or explain away pro-Trek facts and figures. The most infamous example is Trek weapons ranges. Dialogue in the ep says the range is "X". The Warsies at SD.net say "that's not what the footage shows", they must've read their instruments wrong!" That's their excuse ANY time dialogue makes Trek look better. That Starfleet professionals can't read their own instruments correctly.
But aren't we talking about the same Starfleet professionals who routinely fly perfectly good starships through radioactive death clouds simply because they seem not to have mastered the simple concepts of "up" and "down" in space? Maybe they can't read their own instruments.
In case it had eluded you, "radioactive death clouds" ALSO exist in more than two dimensions.
When you are at point A and need to be at point B as fast as possible and point b is on the other side of the RDC, you take a risk.
So, which one are you over there?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.