Trek Portrayals Of Futuristic War Is Unrealistic

Discussion in 'General Trek Discussion' started by polyharmonic, Aug 17, 2017.

  1. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    It seemed like Data should have been the one flying the ship.
     
  2. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Confederation of Earth
    Realistic war would be boring as hell for the viewers. That's all she wrote.
     
  3. velour

    velour Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2014
    Location:
    USA
    Maybe the experience of the M5 fiasco ("The Ultimate Computer") soured Starfleet's attitude about AI.
     
    Mr. Laser Beam likes this.
  4. PrestigeWorldwide

    PrestigeWorldwide Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2017
    Sisko in Sacrifice of Angels finds he has no choice but to try to punch through the Dominion lines. It's space, it's three-dimension and your ship has a cloaking device. Have you tried just going around the enemy fleet? If the goal was to get just one ship to DS9 to stop them from detonating the minefield, at least the Defiant could have done that. Or, for that matter, the freaking Klingons.
     
  5. JirinPanthosa

    JirinPanthosa Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Location:
    JirinPanthosa
    I am SHOCKED, SHOCKED there is unrealism in Star Trek!
     
  6. Kor

    Kor Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Location:
    My mansion on Qo'noS
    Of course space warfare wouldn't be done the way in which it's depicted in Trek (and other sci-fi).

    The whole idea of manned exploration of deep space is daft and outmoded in the first place. http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2009/11/the_myth_of_the_starship.html

    But pure technical realism isn't the point of Star Trek. The point is to have an entertaining experience that hopefully makes you think a little about humanity along the way. The point is also to make a bunch of money for the producers and the network, and turning Trek into a documentary on futurism just wouldn't have the same broad appeal as the light space opera approach.

    Kor
     
  7. Maurice

    Maurice Snagglepussed Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Real Gone
    If each drone could only assimilate 1 person per day, and each new drone could likewise assimilate 1 person per day, you're at 20 billion assimilations in 3 weeks. The math is easy. :)
     
    CorporalCaptain and Tim Thomason like this.
  8. ralfy

    ralfy Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    It's a notable point that applies to many shows, i.e., using drones and androids, if not just robots, for dangerous tasks.
     
  9. CorporalCaptain

    CorporalCaptain Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Location:
    astral plane
    In real life, an adversary like the Borg could overwhelm the Earth with exponential-growth assimilation in a short time. An initial beachhead of ten thousand drones would be overkill. But, post "Q Who," when Q wasn't around to save them, the overriding factor being not to create a no-win scenario for the heroes, the writers had to gimp the Borg in some way.

    ninja'd by @Maurice. (Such is the fate of a browser tab left open overnight.)
     
  10. Tesophius

    Tesophius Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Location:
    NEW YORK CITY
    I fully agree, that's why I hate wars in StarTrek.
     
  11. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Confederation of Earth
    Can't say I blame them.