Never seen this thread, which is why I've said nothing. Speaking as a college sophomore, this should be a good one for me to review while I stall on writing this paper on St. Augustine. *opens link*
Let's see... Production values not bad. Cinematography not bad. Acting not quite hideous.
The Starfleet officer is... absolutely irritating. He's not funny, because this parody fails to actually parody anything. A good parody will have some relationship to the work that is parodied. You know when people say, "It's funny because it's true?" That is the key component of all parody. This doesn't have any of it. The Starfleet officer bears literally no resemblance to anything we've ever encountered in the Star Trek universe (except superficially--the uniform and the sunglasses/VISOR), and so the character falls horribly, horribly flat. Besides the failed attempts at parody that run throughout, there is not a single attempt at humor in the film except for a somewhat clever pun on the phrase "man's meat in my face," which, personally, I considered the highlight of the entire project. As a whole, the film is nothing but arbitrary characters encountering arbitrary events, spewing arbitrary dialogue, and reaching an arbitrary conclusion. No sufficiently arbitrary work can be funny--it is antithetical to the very idea of humor.
So, basically, it's passable in all respects except that the script sucks hardcore. I'm sorry to be so harsh, but you genuinely seem to desire honest feedback, and my feelings on this are overwhelmingly negative. Take it however you like.