If there's no human characters, why even bother to make it a "live action" movie? Why bother to construct sci-fi planet sets if you're just going to put CGI characters against them?
General audiences clearly love them, but I'm not sure many diehard TF fans do (at least beyond the first movie which was actually pretty cool and clearly had more of a Spielberg influence).
http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/27/8...noffs-sequels-universe-so-many-more-happening
If it was a re-boot with no Bay. Yes.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/27/8...noffs-sequels-universe-so-many-more-happening
If it was a re-boot with no Bay. Yes.
Because that one time Bay made a Transformers movie, it flopped. Sure would have been nice to get two or three sequels to it though. Shame we never did.![]()
but I'm not sure many diehard TF fans do (at least beyond the first movie which was actually pretty cool and clearly had more of a Spielberg influence).
On the red carpet for his latest film, Daddy's Home, the action star was asked by CinePop if he was ready to return to the world of robots and humans at war. Without playing coy, or mincing any words, Wahlberg unequivocally responded to the affirmative. While the film is looking to start production early next year, having Wahlberg locked down is probably a good move if Paramount is looking to secure future involvement from Michael Bay.
How about 'This stands an excellent chance of being the very worst big budget summer blockbuster movie EVER !'Say what you will about the story
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.