You put two fans in a room, and you'll be lucky if you only get three opinions.
...which is why any given timeliner might as well settle on specifics if they're so inclined. Doing otherwise might line up more closely with nonfictional historiography, but (IME) leads to a bunch of loose threads which keep a chronology from really coming together.You put two fans in a room, and you'll be lucky if you only get three opinions.
long, long time listener here (i've been browsing the lit section of this site for over ten years), but as i've been online more and more since the lockdown began, i thought hey, get an account and start posting.
thanks! it would appear i actually joined back in 2014. i just haven't gotten around to posting until now. better late than never, i guess.Welcome to the forum!
Oh, and it includes references to the 4-sex nature of Andorians that was established I believe in the DS9 novels (though I forget exactly when this is first brought up--I don't think it's something that ever came up on screen in Star Trek).
Data once mentioned in TNG that "Andorian marriages require groups of four people unless—," which is where the whole thing spun out from.
Oh, ok. I was wondering if there was some canon basis for the 4 sex Andorian unions.
I think at least one or two of IDW's comics have also used the novels 4 gender system for the Andorians. I know the Alien Spotlight: Andorians issue did, and I think I remember hearing about one or two others that did too.No, just one idea that stuck for the prose fiction. (I mean, the LUG RPG books invented their own take on the marriage ceremonies.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.