I definitely see your point. It's not that I'd prefer a nuclear WWIII be written out because it's a low point for humanity in the franchise--the notion that things get worse but they get better too is something I'm a fan of also. I'd just prefer that the future low point better reflect present-day concerns, and the kind of mutually assured destruction of WWIII isn't as ever present a threat as it was in the 60s and 80s.
Good point. That's one more dated idea that could use updating -- the assumption that a global nuclear conflict between East and West is still a likely threat.
I think it'll happen at some point (and indeed has happened to some degree already, though we're still well short of a full reboot). Of course, this hypothetical future iteration of Trek will no doubt be seen as being full of outdated ideas and tropes from whenever it was made eventually.![]()
Which is why it could then be reinvented yet again, just like Sherlock Holmes and Batman and so many other concepts have been periodically reinvented for new generations and new sensibilities.