• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Toronto Sun Sunshine Girls have gotten trampy....

Over the last two weeks or so, they've been using the photoshoots from the 2010 SUN calendar. Looks like they're getting back to the usual stuff now.
 
They tried to block the Sunshine girls at work on the Canoe.ca site. but the troops serving overseas won out because it was a reminder of what they were fighting for at home,
So now the can veiw these beauties while in Kandahar or where ever.
[Hell a cowork had a female cpl go OOlala over the one he had as wall paper. made his day.}
 
Gimme trampy and skimpy. Chicks here in Southeastern Michigan dressed either like bag ladies, or they were raised by nuns. And most over 40 chicks here look more like over 60.
 
I hate to be judgmental but "pretty" is the last word that popped into my head when clicking the OP's link and seeing what exactly a Toronto Sun Sunshine Girl was (Jasmine on Thursday--Asian with red hair, in the event it changes while this thread still gets responses).

Some of the other ones are quite attractive though...trampy or not.
 
I hate to be judgmental but "pretty" is the last word that popped into my head when clicking the OP's link and seeing what exactly a Toronto Sun Sunshine Girl was (Jasmine on Thursday--Asian with red hair, in the event it changes while this thread still gets responses).

Some of the other ones are quite attractive though...trampy or not.

Yeah, I have absolutely nothing against women at all. I just am not a fan of the photoshop style "come hither" stuff as shown in the OPs link.

J.
 
Yeah, Jasmine did absolutely zero for me. The Moonlight Ladies were much more interesting, much more "come hither" than Jasmine with her "flop it out now, big boy" pout.
 
These models suffer greatly from a lack of adequate styling. The hair is mussy (not in a good way), the outfits ill-fitting and unflattering to their bodies. I suspect the models do their own hair, make-up and styling, and what might look ok on the street -- quickly falls apart in an (uninspired) studio setting.

The lighting is also mundane and a bit messy. I keep seeing specular highlights on their temples and cheeks, acccentuating all the wrong features. Yeouch.

The elements all combine to make this style the same as semi-professional escort photography, and as someone who deals with semi-professional escort photography day in and day out and knows this is absolute hackwork commissioned for dubious-at-best purposes, that is NOT complimentary to either this newspaper or their models. I wonder how many of these young women realize what they've been made to look like?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top