• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TNG Rewatch: 5x17 - "The Outcast"

Trekker4747

Boldly going...
Premium Member
Outcast.jpg


The Enterprise is set to aid an alien race that's lost a manned shuttle into a once theoretical space phenomenon, a pocket of "null space." The race, the J'nnai, are an androgynous race having evolved past common gender roles.

Over the course of the mission Riker works closely with one of their specialists, Soren, who asks Riker many questions about being part of a species with two sexes, Riker naturally has his own questions about a race with one sex. As they continue to work together Soren reveals that she's part of a minority of J'naii who identify with common gender roles, in this case female.

On her planet identifying with a gender is considered deviant behavior and if discovered she'll be given treatments to "reprogram" her back into an androgynous way of thinking.

After Riker and Soren save the lost shuttle crew they kiss while on a walk on her planet. But a series of other incidents, as well as Soren's curiosity on gender roles, gets her discovered by her superiors and is put on trial. Riker tries to make an impassioned speech on her behalf, even offering asylum on the ship, but he's turned down.

Soren makes an impassioned speech in order to try and convince the justices to not force people like her into undergoing these treatments but she's found guilty anyway and sent off to be treated. Riker tries to save her before the treatments are set to take place but is too late, the reprogrammed Soren now realizes how "sick" she was all of this time and apologizes to Riker for misleading him. Riker, sad, returns to the Enterprise which sets off for its next mission.

Okay, obviously this was Trek's first stab (or one of the first stabs) to tackle the "gay issue" that was beginning to become more and more on the surface during the the time this episode was produced and still continues to be an issue up to present day.

And, honestly, I think the episode mostly handles the issue okay. It puts enough of a sci-fi twist on it to make it a unique situation while at the same time maintaining the premise of the message it wants to go for. Society taking those who are "deviant" by not being acting in a manner that's not expected and outcasting them from society and in extreme cases taking measures to force them into the status quo.

In the episode Soren speaks of how she's had to hide her leanings for her entire life, in particular scared watching a classmate reprogrammed after identifying as male.

As scary as it sounds, the idea of "reprogramming" someone to fit into the status quo isn't too out of line considering "faith healing" and other forms and attempts of curing or correcting homosexuality is practiced today. Granting that the medical community says it's not only impossible but likely doing more harm than any good making the processes not widely excepted it's still something that exists.

As far as society (in particular American society) may have come in the 20+ years since this episode was made the constant battles continuing on in the "red states" for same-sex marriages shows there's still a long way for our own society to go. And there's still plenty of people out there who see homosexuality as a deviant behavior that needs "correcting," a choice on the person "afflicted" with it or that it's anything other than a human being who simply has different tastes and desires.

Considering the time the episode came from it's actually pretty remarkable and good in how it handles the issue in a unique way.

It's also worth noting that the androgynous "woman" Riker connects with is hardly.... Well, she's hardly Riker's "type" at least when we compare her to all of the other women Riker has sexual encounters with over the course of the series. On a physical level, at least. (This is not to insult the actress playing Soren, but the makeup, costuming, and other aspects were all intentionally designed to make her as androgynous looking as possible.) This actually reveals something about Riker that's good to see in that he's more attracted to the person beneath and not the physicality of the person. Riker truly cared for Soren, so much so he effectively asks for Troi's permission to pursue a relationship, and wanted to save her so badly he potentially jeopardized his career in order to save her.

I'd always heard they originally wanted to use a male actor to play Soren, which Jonathon Frakes was all for, but the show's creators decided to play it safe and used a female.

We get some interesting insight as Soren asks various members of the crew about gender roles where it seems our 20th/21st century manners are still very much in play. (Largely women be more concerned and obvious in their physical appearance to attract men.) There's also discussion during a poker game over gender roles where we learn Worf is bothered by the androgynous races and perhaps still harbors some preferences to traditional gender roles. (Criticizing Troi's choice for wild cards in their poker game, that they make it a woman's game.)

Overall, I think this is an episode that probably gets overlooked when it comes to the "message episodes." And while it's certainly trying to play things fairly safe and isn't too greatly subtle about it's message it still manages to play things pretty good, again considering the time the episode was made.

Not too bad of an episode really. But next week? We're in for a treat!
 
I'd always heard they originally wanted to use a male actor to play Soren, which Jonathon Frakes was all for, but the show's creators decided to play it safe and used a female.

I'd read an article or interview where Frakes mentions that. It's too bad the producers weren't willing to be as risky as the actor. It would have given the episode a lot more impact had they gone for an androgynous looking male actor. It could have been great stunt casting with someone like David Bowie, for example.
 
Edgy. [I mean that kind of negatively].

Really, I can't see Riker falling for a male (and I didn't think Soren was his type at all either). Unless that part of the story would be different, then maybe. But otherwise, no.

This episode suffers because it's so alienating and bizarre. A society that forces its citizens to be androgynous ultimately prevails, which I'm afraid might invite a misreading. Then there's the matter that the treatment she undergoes actually works, which should probably not be the case.

It would have been clearer had it involved hints of homosexuality in a society that is oppressively conformist or conservative in a way that people could identify and understand (considering it was 1992).

I'm glad they went back to a hard sci-fi premise for the next show. A little bit of these 5th season message shows goes a long, long, long way.
 
This episode was just there. I hear all this talk about it being controversial and stuff and if it was written well, I could understand where people were coming from. The problem was the way it was written was somewhat boring, so instead of the episode having a lasting impact, it's kind of forgettable.
 
Edgy. [I mean that kind of negatively].

Really, I can't see Riker falling for a male (and I didn't think Soren was his type at all either). Unless that part of the story would be different, then maybe. But otherwise, no.

This episode suffers because it's so alienating and bizarre. A society that forces its citizens to be androgynous ultimately prevails, which I'm afraid might invite a misreading. Then there's the matter that the treatment she undergoes actually works, which should probably not be the case.

It would have been clearer had it involved hints of homosexuality in a society that is oppressively conformist or conservative in a way that people could identify and understand (considering it was 1992).

I'm glad they went back to a hard sci-fi premise for the next show. A little bit of these 5th season message shows goes a long, long, long way.

Well, the society wasn't "forcing" their citizens to be androgynous it was just they had come that far in their evolution but some people still displayed remnants of gendered behavior, and showing that kind of behavior of a previous iteration of their species was seen as an "illness" that needed to be corrected.
 
I'm fairly certain that by this time, naturally, television had presented gay characters and issues in a much more direct way than what we see here in, "The Outcast." And yet, strangely enough, STAR TREK, the magnet for Special Interest had yet to address homosexuality, in any of its formats. So, it's now up to my beloved Next Generation to take this on. I understand where "they" were coming from, using the Riker character to approach this subject, what with his bravado, machismo and womanising - it would make the episode seem mroe "surprising," at least and "impactful" at most. And I sincerely admire Jonathan Frakes as a performer - as an artist - that he wanted to be the first to make this kind of a "statement" in STAR TREK for the series, for the franchise, for the fans and even for himself. By rights, however, this episode should've belonged to Data.

Of all of the characters, his was the one who could make whatever statement(s) the show wanted to make on the subject and have it resonate with Truth of Character. All of this stuff with Riker in "The Outcast" is pretty much out of character for him, and he's just treated as a sort of a vehicle for a story that ends up being told in a very watered-down manner. The Truth of Data's character, however is that he's curious about the totality of The Human Equation. To experience every aspect about it and to understand what it's all about. And to be on the outside, just enough, to make all kinds of commentary about it that simply wouldn't fly, elsewhere. As it was, "they" went the way they did with this episode and it wasn't much of a statement of any kind, really, other than that they only wanted to make a show of addressing it. If they never brought it up, I wouldn't have ever noticed, really. They seemed to want to, without actually discussing it, though, in what was an apparent attempt at self-preservation. They didn't want to offend anybody. They didn't want to lose ratings, or put off advertisers. Artistically, Entertainment-wise, however you want to look at it, that's pretty weak stuff ...
 
I am all for the message of tolerance and acceptance. That's one thing I really love about this series but honestly this wasn't one of the best episodes. However, Rikers face when Soren inquired about his sexual organs made it all worth it :alienblush:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top