That supports that gender was important in Beverly's reaction.
Really it doesn't support anything other than that writers interpretation of the episode.
That supports that gender was important in Beverly's reaction.
...then it is informative of the characters' feelings and motivations.
Crusher doesn't express a difficulty in continuing her relationship with Odan because he is now female, but simply because it is a human failing to not being able to keep up with change. She may very well be willing to continue her relationship with Odan under different circumstances but it's not that that circumstance is that Odan is now female, just the uncertainty of changes down the road she may have to adapt to.
I totally agree. I already dislike the Klingon Augment virus thing, so recycling it to explain another visual discontinuity.....the next step would be the Section 31's participation.The novels explained Odan was from a Trill colony or something that caught the Klingon mutation virus.
That's terrible. Sometimes no explanation is the best course of action.
The Trills are pretty sinisters in this episode. It really looks like slavery: all for the symbiont mind, absolutely no care for the mind of the host. When Picard recognizes Riker's words, it seems to cause by the rejection an not a real symbiosis. Hello, I'm Kareel and I'm ready to cease to exist. Odan didn't even say the name of his Michael Boltonish host.We could also raise *several* ethical questions on Crusher's part considering she apparently had a romantic encounter with Will's body while hosting Odan. Is that a form of rape on Riker's body? I mean, he didn't know Odan and Crusher had a sexual relationship and likely didn't consent to any sexual activities being performed on his body. It seems sort of unethical for Crusher to not only sleep with Riker's body but to also sleep with someone who is now her patient.
I wonder how much Riker remembers of his time with Odan controlling his body and how awkward things were between him and Crusher for a while after this episode?
Yeah, I think pansexual is a more accurate designation for the Trill than bisexual.I guess it's more of "Pansexual" idea, that people should love the person and not really care about the gender of the body.
Odan doesn't sound like the symbiont was a part of him, but totally him. In DS9, each merging is a different incarnation. Each Dax incarnation had a different job, it's not "Yeah, I'm Odan the diplomat, the body's dying, so I need the sacrifice of another young adult to pursue my career."ODAN: This body is just a host. I am that parasite. That is what must survive. It has always been this way. The Trill are a joined species. A host and a symbiont, and in this fashion we have survived for millennia.
[...]
ODAN: The host body is dying. You must contact the Trill quickly. Tell them I need another host. They will send a replacement. I know this is difficult to accept, but I beg you, Doctor Beverly, help me. This mission must be completed.
[...]
CRUSHER: Odan's host body died of the injuries just over an hour ago. But the symbiont being, Odan, is still alive. Odan is the one who negotiated the last treaty, but the man everyone thought was his father was just another host body.
^I think you're on the right track, good post.
I just wonder, if these "trills" personality is only based on the slug part, what are the humanoids for? Does it kill them? Riker didn't die, but it was temporary. Do they enter a coma like state with the slug taking over? Would Riker remember any of this? It's just too creepy.
If the humanoid part adds to the personality, then part of the personality that was Odan died and Bev would be dealing with a different person. I don't see how she could have continued with that kind of situation. If it didn't add it's personality, then it was like wearing a humanoid suit and could just throw them away as needed. I can see why that would put someone off. That's a plot for a horror movie right there. Like a brain slug or a mad scientist swapping brains, I don't think Beverly, or any human, should have to put up with that.
Ok. This is all fairly standard, cheesy romance dialogue, no problem, not really creepy or anything at all. With one exception: what kind of man, alien or otherwise, would say to his brand new girlfriend - one we know from dialogue in the episode that he only met a couple of weeks ago - the following line: "Promise me we'll be together tonight"? This is odd, because it makes him sound like a desperate, needy teenager. It doesn't sound like the typical kind of thing a man would say to his girlfriend at all...unless he has serious issues, that is. Why is Odan so insecure?CRUSHER: Odan, I have to go.
ODAN: Promise me we'll be together tonight.
CRUSHER: I promise.
(he kisses the inside of her wrist)
ODAN: Then you may go, Doctor Beverly.
CRUSHER: It's just Beverly.
ODAN: Not just Beverly. It's Beverly's smile, it's her kindness, her beauty within and without. So much more than just Beverly.
Now, Odan's last two lines are exactly what I was talking about in my earlier post, where I said they came across as if he was asking Picard's permission to marry Crusher/take her away, or something like that. Just why is Odan this needy and desperate, to the point that he actually goes and asks Picard how 'committed Crusher is to remaining with Starfleet'? That's why it sounds sexist, and backward to me (just my opinion). Why would being in a relationship with Odan mean that Crusher would have to leave Starfleet?ODAN: Well, I do like to go into a situation as well-informed as possible, and I must say that your staff has been quite helpful in briefing me on the problems down here. Particularly Doctor Crusher.
PICARD: My staff is quite capable. I'm glad they've been useful.
ODAN: Your Doctor Beverly is an extraordinary person, both as a scientist and as a woman.
PICARD: Yes, I'm sure that's true. Well, shall we make our way to the shuttlebay?
ODAN: Captain, you know her better than I. Do you have any idea how committed she is to remaining with Starfleet?
PICARD: I wouldn't presume to speak for her.
ODAN: Oh no, of course not. I just thought, well, you've known her so much long than I.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.