Seven looks ever so slightly shocked and very mildly disgusted by the Borg Cube, as though she can't believe that the resident unimatrix could be driving so recklessly.
But it is a nice cover, yes.
The mutiny plot was unbelievable, and, in my opinion, should have ended the careers of Leyton, T'Lana, and Miranda Kadohata with their immediate courtmartials. I know CLB tried to clean this up in the next novel, but the willingness of Starfleet to overlook things like this is one of my pet peeves about the show.
Why would Starfleet overlook three officers who did what Command told them to do? From where they were sitting, Picard was disobeying direct orders from his superiors, so he was in the wrong. Why would Starfleet be against them on this one?
We as readers have the benefit of seeing the characters' inner dialogue, but Kadohata and company surely did not.
I haven't read it since it first came out. I guess I didn't remember that Command ordered them to arrest Picard and the other officers (at least that's what I remember them doing). In that case, you're right -- they shouldn't be courtmartialed if they were following orders of someone who outranked Picard.
Doesn't do much to redeem the book in my mind, though.
Clearly I've blocked a lot of the details out of my mind! (Although not the whole eating Pluto bit, sadly.)Command ordered Picard to do something, and Picard blatantly refused. It should have been Worf's duty to relieve Picard of command, but he didn't. It would then have fallen to Kadohata as second officer to relieve Picard of command and continue on the course Starfleet wanted them on.
Picard's the hero so we as readers know that he's right and Starfleet is wrong, but from Kadohata's POV, Picard was disobeying orders for questionable reasons. IIRC, he didn't even really bother explaining why to her, and T'Lana at least had serious professional reservations about his ability to know what the Borg were up to.
I don't think they should have been court-martialed, but Picard surely should not have let them remain on his ship. Hell, I think Spock should have been punished worse. He hacked the Enterprise before the mutiny even occurred!
But I really didn't enjoy the book either.
Even the fact that the new Borg "absorb" stuff rather than assimilate people.
Even the fact that the new Borg "absorb" stuff rather than assimilate people.
Well, that was specifically presented as a new adaptation. Personally I thought the faster, sleeker, scarier, smarter Borg of BD were a great improvement, the best idea in the book.
I'm just glad that the book got rid of T'Lana. Sorry, but in the other TNG books that she was in she just did not do anything for me and I found that she really slowed the story down (and I don't think that she's appeared in any book since Before Dishonor. With her it almost felt like the editor's wanted to try to have a TOS/Enterprise setup with Picard having a Vulcan as part of his senior staff (which I'm not against), but I just found that the harder the authors tried to push her into the story, the more easily her character was popping out of place and was just not working.
The mutiny plot was okay, but it came at the cost of losing all of the groundwork that KRAD laid in Q & A for Leybenzon and Kadohata. These characters were unrecognizable in this volume and the damage done to their likability is largely irrevocable. A regrettable misstep, IMO.
No, it's Peter David writing a Star Trek book in the same style he has writen many before, which should have been well known to the editor.
Either you don't hire him to write a book in an ongoing multi-author series or you reign him in more. It's that simple.
If you're hellbend on condemning the book look at Clark, not David.
No, it's Peter David writing a Star Trek book in the same style he has writen many before, which should have been well known to the editor.
Either you don't hire him to write a book in an ongoing multi-author series or you reign him in more. It's that simple.
If you're hellbend on condemning the book look at Clark, not David.
I've read plenty of Peter David to find this book similair to what he has done in the past, but completely over the top. Like a comic book.
For all we know, Clark had no choice but to release it, since something had to be for that slot in the season, but wasn't happy with it herself.
I don't condem, nor am I hellbound. I just have an opinion, and that is that not Clark, but David wrote this. So in the end, the one responsible for this is the one who made it, not the one who authorized it.
No, it's Peter David writing a Star Trek book in the same style he has writen many before, which should have been well known to the editor.
Either you don't hire him to write a book in an ongoing multi-author series or you reign him in more. It's that simple.
If you're hellbend on condemning the book look at Clark, not David.
I've read plenty of Peter David to find this book similair to what he has done in the past, but completely over the top. Like a comic book.
For all we know, Clark had no choice but to release it, since something had to be for that slot in the season, but wasn't happy with it herself.
I don't condem, nor am I hellbound. I just have an opinion, and that is that not Clark, but David wrote this. So in the end, the one responsible for this is the one who made it, not the one who authorized it.
Editors are a lot more involved in the process than what you're presenting, though; it isn't just "hire an author, then choose to put out whatever they happen to write or not". They give notes, they guide the direction of the book, they tell the author when something's not working. At least, that's how things work in the best case, how they're supposed to work.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.