• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TMP... what's the difference?

^^ I may have my running time off, but I'm definitely thinking of the DE which is what I have in my video library.
 
It has been so long since I have seen the theatrical version that the DE is the only version I am familiar with.

I remember Sulu clumsily showing Ilia the navigation console and that scene has been cut. But other than that I haven't seen the theatrical version in about 15 years. I own the DE and watch it at least 3 times a year. It is one of my favorite Trek films.
 
^^ GR's novelization of TMP is one of those rare instances where if it supports what onscreen then I accept the printed work as is.

I personally find it difficult to reconcile the "new humans" and the Starfleet brain implants of the novelization with any onscreen version of Trek.
 
^^ GR's novelization of TMP is one of those rare instances where if it supports what onscreen then I accept the printed work as is.

I personally find it difficult to reconcile the "new humans" and the Starfleet brain implants of the novelization with any onscreen version of Trek.
Still, I'll credit GR for thinking ahead because a lot of stuff in TMP wouldn't make readers of SF novels bat an eye today. GR embraced the genuine SF aspects of his creation.
 
It doesn't excuse how lackluster and derivative TMP really was, and that was under his complete artistic control.
 
All stories are essentially derivative. It all comes down to execution. Candidly I suspect you'd have a hard time making a film like TMP today, particularly within a property like Star Trek, even with dramatic missteps corrected. It's not exciting enough for many in today's audience.

But if it were done and done right, or if it were similar but as non Trek SF, then I could see many SF fans being pleased.
 
I saw TMP on opening night and many times after that. I loved its epic scope but it was a deeply flawed film. Any fan would know the story was rehashed and the characters didn't seem quite there.
 
I also saw it on opening night. And although there were disappointments I didn't find them as glaring. And for me the DE was a significant improvement even while acknowledging the film still needs some more dramatic character oompf.
 
I really liked a lot of the DE. I miss some of the original Sound FX (and yes I do realise that was a "rough" mix) and there were some lines of dialog I wish they hadn't cut, but it looked great and recaptured the sense of wonder of the original film.
That said I never thought of this as a great film. It bummed me out then and it bums me out today.
 
Any fan would know the story was rehashed and the characters didn't seem quite there.

I went to see TMP with only random episodes of TAS (in b/w) and about five episodes of TOS under my belt. So I was a fan but, to me, it was a giant reunion movie - and I even read the novelization waiting to get the chance to go and see the movie. And absolutely loved it. I'd never seen "The Changeling", so I had no idea it was derivative of an old plot.
 
Plots get reused all the time. Sci-fi does it, cop and lawyer shows do it, medical dramas do it. superhero movies do it. And we all know that. The distinction is always in the execution and trying to add some fresh wrinkles to the story.
 
Plots get reused all the time. Sci-fi does it, cop and lawyer shows do it, medical dramas do it. superhero movies do it. And we all know that. The distinction is always in the execution and trying to add some fresh wrinkles to the story.

Which TMP really didn't do for me as a fan.

Loved the film, but I don't think it's earned the stature the GR apologists always elevate it to.
 
^^ That may be harsh. I love the film, too, but I can acknowledge its missteps.

People can often project their own feelings onto someone else's work that can colour their view of it.

I don't know all the ins-and-outs of the making of TMP (I know there was a book once, but I never got to see it), but it seems few could see the forest for the tress so to speak. They struggled to come up with a story and they were under pressure to get it done. At some point someone should have stood up and said, "Hold it! It's not bad, but it really needs something more. We need more character drama and tension." Robert Wise should certainly have picked up on it. I think Wise should also have allowed for a little more colour: either make the sets muted and the uniforms more colourful or make the sets more colourful with muted costumes. That said I still love the look of the film and I think it has aged better than any of the other films. There are some anachronisms, sure, but overall I still think it looks more credibly futuristic than any of the others.

Paramount wanted a December opening when what should have happened was them relenting to allowing a another few weeks to get the thing right.
 
Loved the film, but I don't think it's earned the stature the GR apologists always elevate it to.

I'm certainly not a "GR apologist" as I really had no concept of who he was at the time, and Chapel and Rand's different hairstyles in the movie made me very confused as to which actress was which. But, to a 21-year old just stepping out into the world at large, ST:TMP spoke to me, immersed me, in an entertainment experience I've never been able to duplicate since. The concepts, the costumes, the music, the sets, the message... Sure, I can see some faults, but that movie is still my all-time favourite movie - of any genre - so if that's "elevating" a film, so be it.

For all the general fan acceptance of ST II, it still didn't hold a candle to TMP, in sooo many ways.

I don't know all the ins-and-outs of the making of TMP (I know there was a book once, but I never got to see it).

Susan Sackett's "Making of...", which I loved, plus her monthly movie updates in "Starlog" magazine. I got then-current-issue #30 and had to work my way through second hand back issues.

I'd also recommend the hilarious "Chekov's Enterprise", Walter Koenig's pithy diary on the making of the movie.
 
^^ Apparently there are second hand copies of Sackett's The Making Of Star Trek: The Motion Picture floating around so I'll make a point of picking one up.
 
I love the movie too. I think it suffers some because it is one of the movies that many people struggle to enjoy after multiple viewings - limited action being cited as its biggest flaw. I think it impresses far more when viewed on the big screen but even then, since special effects have moved on on the last 30 years, it would be less impressive to a modern audience that has seen it all before.

As a prelude to the Phase II TV show, I think it would have served us extremely well (and would have done so even with fewer special effects). I love the ship, I love how the Federation looks and feels, and I like the crew, especially the aliens on the Rec Deck.

As a 2001-inspired epic movie it can still impress but less so after multiple viewings.

I lost count of how many times I watched it when Spike used to show it constantly. I kind of liked how it sort of took you along on the journey.

I think I prefer the theatrical version because I liked how it didn't sound like all the other versions. The new changes make it more consistent but I think things like the male computer voice helped the colder nature of TMP.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top