Time travel

[Butters]

In my opinion, these paradoxes invalidate this hypothesis as a credible model of time travel.

This is the point on which we disagree. It is only this model which precludes the existence of a paradox, and as a paradox cannot exist it seems to me the only credible model.

And about mass-energy: two waves of opposite amplitude will cancel each other - this means, their energies will delete each other. What happened to that energy?

An interesting question. Its a long time since I read anything about wave interference, but I am confident that the laws of thermodynamics are obeyed.

 

[think]

null sets: in i-space that create the tridoxical effects that realistic relativistic motion into non-motion both and neither but between the real *past time* relative *future times* and probabilistically now as that doesn't/does = exist forever unreally being the wrong/right fluid in the thought that time is unimportant where things are not new nor old nor few untold like bending the fine surface of the sun's chrona(sp) into tones on the chiming doors of light might make any difference where things get thought of and or over motions become moving figures in spoken bliss like literal encorsped froth found everywhere we are.

 

[Butters]

null sets: in i-space that create the tridoxical effects that realistic relativistic motion into non-motion both and neither but between the real *past time* relative *future times* and probabilistically now as that doesn't/does = exist forever unreally being the wrong/right fluid in the thought that time is unimportant where things are not new nor old nor few untold like bending the fine surface of the sun's chrona(sp) into tones on the chiming doors of light might make any difference where things get thought of and or over motions become moving figures in spoken bliss like literal encorsped froth found everywhere we are.

Come again?

 

[ProtoAvatar]

In my opinion, these paradoxes invalidate this hypothesis as a credible model of time travel.

This is the point on which we disagree. It is only this model which precludes the existence of a paradox, and as a paradox cannot exist it seems to me the only credible model.



An interesting question. Its a long time since I read anything about wave interference, but I am confident that the laws of thermodynamics are obeyed.

You haven't read my last post attentively. I treated three different hypothesis about time travel.

You support the "one unchangeable timeline" theory - which requires the universe to break its laws.

The hypothesis invalidated by paradoxes is the "one changeable timeline" one. In your previous posts - except for the one I quoted - you made clear you strongly oppose it.

The third theory - many parallel timelines - doesn't need the causality violations that plague the first two. That's why I prefer it.

 

[TrekGuide.com]

In an earlier thread, I broke down time travel into Five Categories of Time Paradoxes.