Neither does my local garage mechanic. What makes Billy Bowtie, physicist, anymore worth listening to on the history of Islam?
How am I allowed respond here? How can I re-phrase this? Without getting an infraction someone?
This Billy 'Bowtie' as you call him
I like him, I find this man's rational thought process good, maybe its the fact he has studied histoy that's why I like him. Maybe I like this man's method of analysis, he has teached and explained events to people before. Maybe why I like him its because he is schooled, he reads historical texts and has a number of Phds and scientific mind of math and physics. I find this man's mind, a mind of scientific skepticism and of critical thinking to be sound.
He doesn't seem to respond emotionally or irrationally like some other people who will go unnamed from now onward
I'd like to know that too. He seems just as biased as any RWNJ
Well there lies a difference between opinion and fact
for example I or someone could say a political statement, like - a number of people on the left love to censor people for the sake of 'political correctness'...that is just an opinion
However a man of rationallity and science might have different method, he might study rational scientific theory. A person like this he might study fuel oxidation combustion, he might do study and observation and some up with 'facts' and make statements such as 'if you put paper on fire it burns'. Saying if you put paper on fire it burns is not really an opinion or a bias, its a fact and if our politics are left leaning or right leaning it can not change this fact.
Read their books for yourself, you can download translations of quran or koran, bukhari, the hadis or hadith and sunnah. Read them, it might take a while but its worth it if your nation is pro-immigration or pro-refugee you should at least know what your nation will be getting into. Then judge for yourself is this man's logic sound, is this part of their culture and are the things he quotes from the koran true?
Last edited: