So way back when it was announced that Trek XI actually wouldn't be released on Christmas, there was - unsurprisingly - a lot of dismay. I was among those who decried an additional 5 months of waiting for the new movie.
But now that the movie is almost here, my question is: do you think pushing the movie back was a good idea? It seems to me that a lot more buzz is building up than they could have gotten going if they'd gone for the original Christmas release date (no Superbowl ad, for example...). Frankly this is one of the biggest marketing campaigns I've seen for a film, ever... and though they of course would have ramped things up sooner with the earlier release, I still think they have gotten a ton more buzz because they've given more time for it to build up.
Also, what it would have to compete against is worth considering. For reference, a few of the movies in theaters on Christmas or released earlier in December: Benjamin Button, Marley and Me, The Spirit, Revolutionary Road, Valkyrie, Bedtime Stories, Yes Man, Despereaux, Seven Pounds, The Day the Earth Stood Still. There weren't any massive releases for a couple of weeks after Christmas, unless you count Paul Blart: Mall Cop.
None of these were absolute flat-out blockbusters on Christmas, but I think collectively they could have represented a fair bunch of films to go against. Star Trek would definitely have won, but I'm not sure by how much.
On May 8, the only real major movies that will have been out for a week will be X-Men Origins and (if it somehow turns out to be big) Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, along with some animated movie called Battle for Terra. I don't recognize any of the other movies set to release May 8 - Adoration, Next Day Air, and Little Ashes.
If X-Men doesn't turn out to be a monster in its second week, I think Trek has a good shot of being totally dominant for a while; May 15 only sees Angels and Demons as a really big release. May 22 poses more challenges - Terminator Salvation and Night At the Museum 2.
So, taking everything into consideration, do you think the move back was a good or a bad idea?
But now that the movie is almost here, my question is: do you think pushing the movie back was a good idea? It seems to me that a lot more buzz is building up than they could have gotten going if they'd gone for the original Christmas release date (no Superbowl ad, for example...). Frankly this is one of the biggest marketing campaigns I've seen for a film, ever... and though they of course would have ramped things up sooner with the earlier release, I still think they have gotten a ton more buzz because they've given more time for it to build up.
Also, what it would have to compete against is worth considering. For reference, a few of the movies in theaters on Christmas or released earlier in December: Benjamin Button, Marley and Me, The Spirit, Revolutionary Road, Valkyrie, Bedtime Stories, Yes Man, Despereaux, Seven Pounds, The Day the Earth Stood Still. There weren't any massive releases for a couple of weeks after Christmas, unless you count Paul Blart: Mall Cop.
None of these were absolute flat-out blockbusters on Christmas, but I think collectively they could have represented a fair bunch of films to go against. Star Trek would definitely have won, but I'm not sure by how much.
On May 8, the only real major movies that will have been out for a week will be X-Men Origins and (if it somehow turns out to be big) Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, along with some animated movie called Battle for Terra. I don't recognize any of the other movies set to release May 8 - Adoration, Next Day Air, and Little Ashes.
If X-Men doesn't turn out to be a monster in its second week, I think Trek has a good shot of being totally dominant for a while; May 15 only sees Angels and Demons as a really big release. May 22 poses more challenges - Terminator Salvation and Night At the Museum 2.
So, taking everything into consideration, do you think the move back was a good or a bad idea?
Last edited: