In the end it's what's on the page that counts. Yes outstanding visual effects and sound effects are nice and can add to the overall ambiance; but in the end if the script sucks, money isn't going to make what's on the page better (unless you just abandoned something and do a different script, but again it's what's on the page that counts.)Good evening.
If you could take a single episode of Star Trek: The Original Series and reshoot it with an unlimited budget (for actors, special effects, scoring, et cetera), which would it be and why?
Audrey or Katherine?
In the end it's what's on the page that counts. Yes outstanding visual effects and sound effects are nice and can add to the overall ambiance; but in the end if the script sucks, money isn't going to make what's on the page better (unless you just abandoned something and do a different script, but again it's what's on the page that counts.)
And for me better effects wouldn't make a given episode any better or worse. Even as far as TOSR goes; the only versions of TOS episodes I had were the 1966-69 Originals, I'd still want to watch them and would enjoy as much as I have since I first saw them.
But that's me.
Better sets, better writers, better directors, actors we'd never dream possible, expanding a single episode to two (or more?)...the sky's the limit.
Candidly TOS had some damn good writers, actors and directors. We wouldn’t be here still talking about TOS if it hadn’t had them.
Hmm, very interesting question.If you could take a single episode of Star Trek: The Original Series and reshoot it with an unlimited budget (for actors, special effects, scoring, et cetera), which would it be and why?
This is the best inadvertent review of the Director's Edition of TMP I've ever read.Vfx are nice.
Story is the meat.
Don't just fix the seasoning if the steak is cooked poorly.
Are we talking about unlimited budget back in the late 60s or with today's technology?
That's not a bad choice. In that 'Space Hippie' episode is the potential for a 'cult of personality' episode that could really be thought-provoking and relevant for today.If it's a remake made today I would pick The Way to Eden, remaking a popular episode is always difficult, they're already good and there's a big chance people will dislike the changes I make, so why not pick a bad episode? Much easier to improve on.
The "shoestring budget" thing is another trope now widely accepted as true among Trek fans, but the fact is that Star Trek had one of the highest per-episode production budgets of any show on the air at that time. Yes, there was a significant budget reduction for episodes produced during the third season, but even so it remained one of the more costly shows then airing.I had a somewhat similar question. In the 'harsh realities' thread, someone remarked that the 'poor costumes', 'poor makeup' and 'dangerous aliens looking too silly' were because of a lack of money. I certainly believe that, but it made me wonder as to how convincing they could they have made those aliens (and their costumes/makeup) back in the day, with the finest that unlimited 1966 money could have bought them?
I would only like to see more money put into the planet surface scenes. So that would mean more location shooting. "City on the Edge of Forever" would benefit from more realistic "New York City" scenes than the "already used a few times" Mayberry backlot. Or see more or Argelius or that little planet where we met Rojan and the Kelvans
Why did I suddenly envision a Filmation sequence: Rojan and the Kevan's musical acts in between scenes in TAS...?
What about “The Empath?” Lots of possibilities here. Bring out more of the surreal elements but move beyond the minimalism.
The "shoestring budget" thing is another trope now widely accepted as true among Trek fans, but the fact is that Star Trek had one of the highest per-episode production budgets of any show on the air at that time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.